Author Topic: Nine wolves found dead during gun deer season (Read 13988 times)

myronman3 · « **Reply #150 on:** January 17, 2010, 04:08:09 PM »

shoot, if you think things are slow up here, dee is coming here and busting our chops, so things must be REALLY slow in texas. either that, or he has the local coyote population in check for the winter. lol.

Dee · « **Reply #151 on:** January 17, 2010, 04:20:54 PM »

myronman, I ain't killed a coyote in two weeks. I killed a squirrel this mornin, but it wasn't a genuine hunted squirrel. It was in my pecan trees out back, and ole Huff was barkin treed when I got home from church. He had worked so hard at keepin him treed while I was at church that he was wore out, so I just gave the squirrel to him. It'll keep him dedicated.

I ain't bustin ya'll chops, I'm hair-assin ya. I ain't got no life either. That's why we're all here.

Cheesehead · « **Reply #152 on:** January 17, 2010, 04:21:20 PM »

Quote from: Drilling Man on January 17, 2010, 04:05:01 PM

Quote from: Dee on January 17, 2010, 04:00:45 PM
I guess so but, dead wolves?

That's better than live ones!

DM

YES

Cheese

myronman3 · « **Reply #153 on:** January 17, 2010, 04:33:58 PM »

well i am glad huff's efforts were rewarded. ya shoulda taken a picture of huff with said squirrel. i bet he was awful proud of himself. i get a kick out of the jack russells and if i were to get another dog, i would consider them. they sound like tough little $#*!$.

regarding the other stuff... it is all in fun, i know. i have got more than one chuckle off of your jabs on this thread. good stuff.

Dee · « **Reply #154 on:** January 17, 2010, 06:20:03 PM »

Yea Huffs a squirrel huntin machine but not very sociable. I have a new Rat Terrier since our other "house dog" died and he's my everyday runnin buddy. In fact his name is "Buddy". I'm hopin he will be a good squirrel dog with a better attitude. Huff just don't like anyone except me, my wife and my mother. But he's a hell'va outside watch dog, and copperhead killer. He's not allowed in the house, and really doesn't want in. Besides he a klepto. You leave it laying and he will steal it when you ain't lookin.

mogwai · « **Reply #155 on:** January 23, 2010, 04:26:22 PM »

Quote from: SHOOTALL on January 17, 2010, 10:33:01 AM

Would someone explain how ethics as defined in the dictionary applies to hunting ? Please list the definition as it applies not what you think it says .

Definitons aside, ethics can be explained as "How will you behave when nobody is watching?"

Sportsmanship is a big part of how we defend and explain hunting. Sportsmanship is related to personal ethics. We tell the non hunting public that we have some rules. We abide by fair chase. We support renewable use of natural resources. We use what we kill.

I don't think this applies. I know

myronman3 · « **Reply #156 on:** January 23, 2010, 04:52:55 PM »

says YOU. I says, the ethical thing to do is shoot them on site.

mogwai · « **Reply #157 on:** January 23, 2010, 04:59:07 PM »

Quote from: myronman3 on January 23, 2010, 04:52:55 PM

says YOU. I says, the ethical thing to do is shoot them on site.

Sure. Federal law says endangered species. Ethical hunters want to fight that in court. You just wanna shot them ****** wolves. (last edited by 379 Peterbilt)

billy_56081 · « **Reply #158 on:** January 23, 2010, 05:02:54 PM »

ETHICS? Sounds like we have a petard member here. Ehtics are a subjective thing and there is no way to say what is ethical and what is not. Now I can tell right from wrong but ethics is a made up liberal thing.

Cheesehead · « **Reply #159 on:** January 23, 2010, 05:05:06 PM »

Quote from: billy_56081 link=topic=192967.msg 1099006402#msg 1099006402 date=1264305774

ETHICS? Sounds like we have a petard member here. Ethics are a subjective thing and there is no way to say what is ethical and what is not. Now I can tell right from wrong but ethics is a made up liberal thing.

Billy,

We need to add troll to his resume.

mogwai · « **Reply #160 on:** January 23, 2010, 05:14:57 PM »

Quote from: billy_56081 on January 23, 2010, 05:02:54 PM

ETHICS? Sounds like we have a petard member here. Ehtics are a subjective thing and there is no way to say what is ethical and what is not. Now I can tell right from wrong but ethics is a made up liberal thing.

Yes Billy, Ethics is a made up liberal thing. It is what liberal folks (and most of the rest of us) use to decide what is wrong and what is right. How do you come down on this question?
Endangered species should be protected by law.

myronman3 · « **Reply #161 on:** January 24, 2010, 12:23:47 AM »

the wolf is far from endangered. in canada, you can buy tags for them. they are everywhere. in fact, in wisconsin, they are everywhere. and last year for a brief period, they were de-listed until some liberal judge somewhere threw out legal control measures because of his personal emotions, not scientific evidence. just another case of a liberal scumbag sticking his nose where it doesnt belong. it is o.k. though, as people here have had enough and are just shooting the damn things when the opportunity arises.

the system is rigged, and people that hide behind the "ethics" arguement have got their heads in the sand. i'll be damned if i sit back and let one put-nut's emotions destroy everything conservationists have accomplished in the last 130 years.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #162 on:** January 24, 2010, 03:42:39 AM »

I come down on the side of gut shooting the wolves and having run off before they die. Now I wouldn't do that myself as that would be illegal. But if I were on a jury where someone had shot a wolf I would vote not guilty.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #163 on:** January 25, 2010, 03:53:28 AM »

mogwai ,Seems your definition does not match printed definitions . Like i said it does not apply . Morals may fit .

Graybeard · « **Reply #164 on:** January 25, 2010, 04:22:29 AM »

mogwai is trying hard to get himself banned from this site. I'm inclined to accomodate him.

I just figured out why mogwai is giving you guys such a hard time on this issue. He apparently works for the Wisconsin DNR.

myronman3 · « **Reply #165 on:** January 25, 2010, 08:28:36 AM »

http://chronotype.com/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=18940&SectionID=12&SubSectionID=108&S=1

Oldshooter · « **Reply #166 on:** January 25, 2010, 10:04:44 AM »

Quote

Because Ruid confirmed that Landon's chocolate Lab was attacked by a wolf, the dog owner's veterinarian bill will be paid for through the state's Bureau of Endangered Resources.

Which means the taxpayers!

Buckskin · « **Reply #167 on:** January 27, 2010, 04:08:37 AM »

I remember reading way back in this post about how Minnesota has way more wolves and that you don't hear hunters complaining about it. Well guess again...

http://www.startribune.com/sports/outdoors/82752032.html?elr=KArksi8cyaiUo8cyaiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUr

They estimate 15-19 adult sized deer per wolf. Now how many adult sized deer do you think they take down in may/june/July??? I'm guessing those little fawns are a hell of a lot easier to catch than the adults, especially when the snow is gone.

jcn59 · « **Reply #168 on:** January 30, 2010, 08:19:42 PM »

Interesting that Wisconsin will let you kill a wolf if you can convince the DNR that it attacked you, but if it attacks your dog, you can't hurt the poor wolf.

I think that if a wolf hurts your dog and you DON'T try to stop it, then you are an a$$ whole, and you should stick to goldfish for pets.

"Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out." Good enough for Patton (?) and good enough for me, imho.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #169 on:** February 01, 2010, 02:42:37 AM »

It was the Arch Bishop that said it first really .
And it would seem if you were with your dog the wolf would be attacking you and your dog only tried to help you .
One must choose their words carefully and also offer no extra facts .

myronman3 · « **Reply #170 on:** February 01, 2010, 03:36:43 AM »

Quote

I just figured out why mogwai is giving you guys such a hard time on this issue. He apparently works for the Wisconsin DNR.

oh really? another incompetent boob from madison that cant count? the thing i love about the imbeciles at the dnr that are wolf advocates is the simple fact that their wages are paid for by sportsmen and women. and after what the dnr and the wolves have done to the deer herd in wisconsin, people are not buying licenses anymore. i used to buy a conservation patrons license as far back as i can remember. not last year. not this year, and not until there is massive change in the dnr as is. dont think i am the only one. this year license sales were bleak and after the year people that did buy a license had, expect huge decreases in license sales (i.e. funding for you folks at the dnr).

the problem is you damn fools have forgotten where your bread is buttered at. how much does peta contribute to your funding? how much does a wolf pay for a license to slaughter in wisconsin? and, here is the million dollar question...... what do you think you are going to do after your job at the dnr is gone? you are too arrogant to make it in the real work force. you have no job skills that we need, and even if you had something going for you competition is pretty hard right now. in short, you are SCREWED once your job is eliminated; and believe me, it is coming. already facing budget problems, the service centers are working reduced hours. and, after this coming year of bleak license sales, expect to see plenty of worthless EX-dnr employees in the UNEMPLOYMENT line.

i love it when a person's own actions come around and smite them.

Cheesehead · « **Reply #171 on:** February 01, 2010, 01:54:08 PM »

Quote from: myronman3 on February 01, 2010, 03:36:43 AM

Quote
I just figured out why mogwai is giving you guys such a hard time on this issue. He apparently works for the Wisconsin DNR.

oh really? another incompetent boob from madison that cant count? the thing i love about the imbeciles at the dnr that are wolf advocates is the simple fact that their wages are paid for by sportsmen and women. and after what the dnr and the wolves have done to the deer herd in wisconsin, people are not buying licenses anymore. i used to buy a conservation patrons license as far back as i can remember. not last year. not this year, and not until there is massive change in the dnr as is. dont think i am the only one. this year license sales were bleak and after the year people that did buy a license had, expect huge decreases in license sales (i.e. funding for you folks at the dnr).

the problem is you damn fools have forgotten where your bread is buttered at. how much does peta contribute to your funding? how much does a wolf pay for a license to slaughter in wisconsin? and, here is the million dollar question...... what do you think you are going to do after your job at the dnr is gone? you are too arrogant to make it in the real work force. you have no job skills that we need, and even if you had something going for you competition is pretty hard right now. in short, you are SCREWED once your job is eliminated; and believe me, it is coming. already facing budget problems, the service centers are working reduced hours. and, after this coming year of bleak license sales, expect to see plenty of worthless EX-dnr employees in the UNEMPLOYMENT line. i love it when a person's own actions come around and smite them.

+1

myronman3 · « **Reply #172 on:** February 02, 2010, 02:09:20 AM »

mogwai is aweful quiet on this....maybe he already got the ax from the dnr???

Cheesehead · « **Reply #173 on:** February 02, 2010, 01:20:14 PM »

What a poor representative of the DNR, with the obscenities and personal attacks.

Cheese

myronman3 · « **Reply #174 on:** February 02, 2010, 03:39:31 PM »

whaddya suppose the odds are that he is the same representative that gave that presentation are?

woodchukhntr · « **Reply #175 on:** February 03, 2010, 05:44:55 AM »

How do I go about getting this topic to stop showing up in new replies to my posts? I am getting tired of seeing it!

myronman3 · « **Reply #176 on:** February 03, 2010, 07:21:38 AM »

Buckskin · « **Reply #177 on:** February 03, 2010, 08:49:58 AM »

Quote from: woodchukhntr on February 03, 2010, 05:44:55 AM

How do I go about getting this topic to stop showing up in new replies to my posts? I am getting tired of seeing it!

Stop checking "new replies to your posts"!

jcn59 · « **Reply #178 on:** February 03, 2010, 07:33:15 PM »

Shootall~~~~

I tried.

Oldshooter · « **Reply #179 on:** February 03, 2010, 10:29:54 PM »

This is Hilarious! People are posting here and coming back to complain that they are still coming here! These wolves still aint been buried! nor this thread it seems!

IF you dont wanna see what you dont wanna see click on the mark as read button and it will go away!