Author Topic: The Great Remington Debate  (Read 29641 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline One Eye

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #150 on: November 30, 2009, 03:36:45 PM »
Love their shotguns.  Their rifles don't really do anything for me, and their reputation for "out of the box" accuracy was not defended in those that I have owned.

I realize this is heresy on this board, but it is fact, not emotion.  Buy what you like and don't worry about what others think or like.
Dan
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." ~ Thomas Jefferson

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #151 on: November 30, 2009, 03:40:35 PM »
I'd say you just have terrible luck.  That's fact not emotion.  The Remington Model 700 is the most accurate production rifle in the world.  Also fact!
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline maddogg

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 120
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #152 on: December 01, 2009, 02:58:28 PM »
I bought a remington 597 .17 HMR for $360. Now remington recalled them because they are unsafe to shoot.I guess they had lots of problems with them discharging out of battery.They will send me a $250 voucher toward another remington product. Why should I take a $110 loss for their screw-up?
I bought my last remington!!
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his
level and beat you with experience.

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #153 on: December 01, 2009, 03:07:15 PM »
Why should they give you anything?
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline Squib

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1592
  • Gender: Male
  • G- S- T- and I ain't got time to bleed!
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #154 on: December 01, 2009, 08:29:36 PM »
every company screws up eventually... firing out of battery is a big deal though

remington owns marlin, marlin bought and consolidated NEF/H&R, some BIG company owns remington (plus others I believe)
so with all that to manage under one roof- I can see how some stuff could go wrong.  thankfully it's not all in the same factory or I'd be a lot more worried.

Offline TLARbb

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 276
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #155 on: December 02, 2009, 01:36:34 AM »
I bought a remington 597 .17 HMR for $360. Now remington recalled them because they are unsafe to shoot.I guess they had lots of problems with them discharging out of battery.They will send me a $250 voucher toward another remington product. Why should I take a $110 loss for their screw-up?
I bought my last remington!!

I guess I can understand why you feel that way, but if you don't want the voucher send it to me.  I can use it.

EJ

Offline Squib

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1592
  • Gender: Male
  • G- S- T- and I ain't got time to bleed!
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #156 on: December 02, 2009, 02:36:37 AM »
he's still gonna lose money though...

maybe congress should do a "buy-back" so all the angry gun owners don't go off and start shooting up.. whatever the evil guns tell them to shoot at (it's the guns, not satan or spirits or mental issues).  why not?  everyone else that makes bad products can get the government to cover the losses lately. 

Offline maddogg

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 120
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #157 on: December 02, 2009, 03:52:48 PM »
Why should they give you anything?

Swampman, you feel companys should be allowed to sell defective products to their customers. Remington knew there was a problem with this gun from the beginning.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his
level and beat you with experience.

Offline Squib

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1592
  • Gender: Male
  • G- S- T- and I ain't got time to bleed!
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #158 on: December 02, 2009, 08:29:48 PM »
if the managewent was truly unaware then the quality control must be terrible.  I bet the recall is just about liability- just watch the news, someone will lose an eye today and remington will lose only lawyers fees because the gun wasn't shipped back last week.... mofos

Offline JimFromTN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #159 on: December 04, 2009, 05:06:36 AM »
The 870 is the greatest pump shotgun ever made.  Lots of aftermarket parts and as far as I know, the easiest maintained pump shotgun.  The 700 is the most customizable bolt action rifle ever made.  You won't find more aftermarket parts for any other bolt action rifle made.  Go to David Tubb's and Darrell Holland's websites and see what rifle they stock the most variety of parts for.

As for out of the box accuracy, they may or may not be the best.  The only way to tell which rifle is the best out of the box is to find the best load for each rifle and then compare and they only real way to do that is to reload for consistency.  Although, there are people that will do that, the average hunter will not.  The average hunter buys whatever is on the shelf that they can afford and sights in thier rifle with that one load and then bases thier decision about that rifles accuracy on that one load.

Offline charles p

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2374
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #160 on: December 04, 2009, 08:05:37 AM »
Before Kenny Jarrett made his own, he used Remington receivers for all his projects.  You couldn't get him to use any other.

Offline Squib

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1592
  • Gender: Male
  • G- S- T- and I ain't got time to bleed!
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #161 on: December 04, 2009, 05:45:26 PM »
tennessee jim, good point


I was that way before I started loading, but then again I had a used rifle/scope combo M700 that would put overlapping holes in targets at 100yds if I used a vice... I wish I still had that gun (synthetic 300 win mag wasn't fun to shoot, way worse than my 870 on recoil though I should have just grown genitally and dealt with the pain)

don't blame the gun unless multiple people have verified that the gun won't group- blame the shooter (any brand, any ammo, any weather)

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #162 on: December 04, 2009, 06:05:37 PM »
Why should they give you anything?

Swampman, you feel companys should be allowed to sell defective products to their customers. Remington knew there was a problem with this gun from the beginning.

As did Ruger......they didn't refund any money on their .22 Mag semi-auto which did the same thing.
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline JPShelton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 460
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #163 on: December 09, 2009, 01:31:33 AM »
The poster right before told of three Remingtons, one good so he brought two that have made them decide that Remington is not worth the risk ever again.


Brithunter is one of my favourite posters on this forum and comes across the sort of fellow I'd enjoy spending time in the field with, so I hope that he doesn't take offense by my response the above quote, in which he appears to reference a prior contribution of mine to this thread.

In my prior post, I tried to articulate that my personal lack of desire to purchase another Remington firearm is due in large measure to the fact that "Big Green" does not have anything in their current product lineup that I can't live without.  I pointed out that if they still manufactured the 332 O/U shotgun, I would consider being a Remington customer.

I don't "hate on Remington."  I have no reason to. In fact, I have every reason in the world to be as rabid a fan of their line as Swampman is.  Every adult male in my family on both my father and mother's sides owns at least one Remington firearm and for the majority, ALL of the rifles and shotguns they own are Remingtons.  I also trusted my life to the venerable 870 during my tenure in law enforcement and I don't think that trust was misplaced.  Also, full disclosure prompts me to add that the most accurate firearm I've ever shot is my father's XP 100 in 7mm Bench Rest Remington.  It literally groups into one ragged hole.  Shot after shot after shot.  The only thing done to it was the addition of a scope.  Otherwise, it is as supplied by Remington.

I am not a huge fan of the Model 700.  That isn't because my one an only personally owned example was a 2.5 MOA shooter and an inconsistant one at that.  The truth of the matter is that I am the kind of hunter who is more inclined to brag about how CLOSE he got to the game rather than how far off it was when he killed it.  The hunting field is a test of hunting skill in my world and in that same world, shooting skill is tested on the target range.  I could have kept on hunting with that Mountain Rifle of mine from purchase to present and its 2.5 MOA groups wouldn't have kept me from downing my share of game.  That level of "precision" is more than adequate for the way I hunt the game intended to be hunted with that rifle.

I can appreciate the engineering and design of the Model 700.  It has earned the reputation that it has.  It just isn't my cup of tea because in my hands, a Model 700 just feels so wrong.  For me, its an ergonomic thing.

Tastes change.  I thought my CZ 550 in .30-'06 was the cat's whiskers until I tried the Savage Model 10 Sierra that I currently shoot.  The Savage simply fits me better than the CZ did.  It is also significantly lighter.  It is also slightly more accurate but not enough to make a difference on a deer stalk.

I have had one excellent personal ownership experience with a Remington product (my 870, which I wouldn't want to part with) and one dissapointing one (the .280 M-700 Mountain Rifle I owned 20 years ago).  I bought my Father an 11-87 back in 1987 and that has proven to be an excellent gun.  If I didn't have an 870 that essentially does everything an 11-87 will do, I might consider buying one or, more likely, an 1100 Sporting or 1100 G3.

My wife bought her 870.  I wasn't involved with the purchase and wasn't there when the deal was consumated.  So I can't say that I bought it.  I didn't.   

It was a complete POS however, and so it is true that Remington can and at least occasionally does produce rubbish.  Their customer service left something to be desired, too.  While "She Who Must Be Obeyed" has vowed to the moon and stars to never, ever spend another dime on a Remington product, I have taken no such vow.

If I can offer an analogy, the British auto industry built plenty of rubbish in its day.  A lot of it is on this side of the pond, quitely rusting away. That doesn't stop me from lusting after a Land Rover Defender 90 when I see one.

So, for the record, I am not a rabid Remington fanatic, but I don't hate on them, either. I was serious when I suggested that if Remington made 332 O/U shotguns still, I'd be highly inclined to buy one.  I wouldn't if I thought it would be a POS.

Now, if you want to talk Ruger, bash away.  I'll be happy to join in.  And if Brithunter should ever make it to Tahlequah, Oklahoma and wish to engage in a little Ruger bashing, there's a cool little pub here near the University where I'd be more than happy to supply him with pints of Guiness or Bass in an effort to establish a loquatious mood.

-JP

Offline JBlk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #164 on: December 09, 2009, 02:13:09 AM »
If I could only own one weapon it would be a Remington.This company still makes a weapon from quality materials and vends them at a reasonable price.The reliability is far above the accepted standard, and the weapon will last your lifetime and your Sons and Grandsons.Most of the problems created in the manfacture of of our firearms are not caused by the designer but rather by nuisance lawsuits filed by people who aspire to profit from a large corporation.Some businesses solve this problem by simply closing their doors.I am glad that Remington has not been one of those to fall along the way side.

Offline JimFromTN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #165 on: December 09, 2009, 07:48:44 AM »
Great, stroke Brithunter's ego.  Thats all we need.

Offline sniperVLS

  • Remington & Sig Sauer addict!
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
  • Gender: Male
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #166 on: December 10, 2009, 01:07:20 AM »
 ::)

Offline Brithunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
Re: The Great Remington Debate
« Reply #167 on: December 10, 2009, 11:41:28 AM »
Great, stroke Brithunter's ego.  Thats all we need.

Thank you I needed a grin  ;D feeling a little under the weather due to upsetting an old whiplash injury  :'(.

Quote
And if Brithunter should ever make it to Tahlequah, Oklahoma and wish to engage in a little Ruger bashing, there's a cool little pub here near the University where I'd be more than happy to supply him with pints of Guiness or Bass in an effort to establish a loquatious mood.

Cheers for the offer "JPShelton" but even should I make it to your watering hole thanks for the offer but I'll pass on the Beer  :D as I don't drink any beer.I am sure we could something else for me to drink tough  ;) As for the Rugers I am not very familar with the Ruger Bolt Actions although I nearly brought one of their Express rifles some years ago but the price was just too much for my budget. I did used to have a nice No1B in 300 Win Mag but I traded it off in a deal to get a collectable DWM Mauser M93 a few years ago.

I must report the I did have some success with some Remington Express 80 Grain .243 ammunition. It shot very well though the Parker-Hale Model 1000 I was trying out. The box had 12 rounds left in I after a test of another rifle which it didn't suit but after shooting the last 12 in this P-H rifle I can say in rifles that like it it's accurate  ;). My local Gunshop didn't have any in Remington 25-06 when I wanted to try some in the newly acquired rifle so we will have to wait until then get some more in before we can test it out.