I'm thinking about getting a bear hunting rifle. This last season I was up in Ontario and I was hunting with my 30-30. It's not that I don't believe in the 30-30, but I wouldn't mind trying something a little bigger diameter with heavier bullets. I'll admit that it's more for me just to feel better about having a bigger bullet.
I've got a Puma 44 mag, and some 320gr grizzly ammo but it's stainless steel and I'm still not too confident with it's accuracy. I've been kicking around picking up a 1895 45/70 and putting a peep sight on it. I'm going to see what happens with "after holidays" sales. I've always kind of wanted a 1895 45/70 so that's another plus.
For hunting baited black bear at those short ranges would it even matter though? With a 30-30, 44 mag, or a 45-70 at a "stones throw" distance is there really much difference in what they can do?
Not be taken as a insult, but you would be better off using the 30/30 Winchester.
45/70 isn't what I would call a good bear caliber - unless you are only going to shoot a couple of yards.
Anything more than 100 yards with the 45/70 is iffy at best. Peep sights went out with Out doors toilets.
44 Magnum isn't all that bad, but I would go with a Rifle chambered with the 44 instead of the pistol.
To be truthful, ALL I would use is my .300 Winchester Magnum.
1 angry, wounded bear - coming up the tree after me is all the more I would be able to take.
There is always a first time and not much room for a second time.
PLUS - Baiting is more like shooting fish in a barrel. Not my kind of hunting!