« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: HUnt Sidearm  (Read 2130 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Survivor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 124
  • Gender: Male
HUnt Sidearm
« on: December 21, 2007, 07:15:23 AM »
How do you feel about this list.  I'm paying these special consideration as a hunting partner.  Any experiences or thoughts?  I'll have time to shoot them at a range soon and decide for myself if 38 oz is too light for the 44mag.  I don't really want a ported barrel either.  TWo of these offer that I think.  Thanks

1. Taurus model 44, http://www.taurususa.com/products/product-details.cfm?id=278&category=Revolver

2. S&W model 686, http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10001&catalogId=11101&langId=-1&productId=12762&tabselected=tech&isFirearm=Y&parent_category_rn=15705

3. Ruger Redhawk, http://ruger.com/Firearms/FAProdSpecsView?model=5014
Logged

Offline dougk

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1937
  • Driftwood TEXAS
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2007, 09:02:13 AM »
Given the issues with Taurus and having had a Ruger Redhawk,  I would go with the S&W.
Logged

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27024
  • Gender: Male
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2007, 09:42:40 AM »
I don't understand the question.  :o ???

You list your first option as a Taurus M44 which is a .44 Magnum but your link is to the M66 .357 Magnum. Your second item listed is also a .357 magnum the S&W M686. Only your last listed item is a .44 magnum yet that is what you seem to be talking about buying. I'm confused.  ??? Which of course is nothing new.  ;D

Do you want a .357 Magnum or a .44 Magnum?

If a .357 then the S&W 686 is an excellent choice but is kinda heavy for a .357 to my thinking. I prefer the S&W M66 as it is the size I feel a .357 Magnum should be. If you are wanting a .44 magnum then you need to be looking at the M29 or M629 in the S&W line or perhaps even the very light 329 but with max loads recoil is gonna be a handful.

I'd avoid the Taurus guns completely unless you go with the very heavy Raging Bull which seems to be good guns in spite of Taurus' quality problems with their other guns.

I'll avoid discussing the Ruger as I'm just not very fond of them. In general to me they feel more like boat anchors than handguns.
Logged


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline Survivor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 124
  • Gender: Male
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2007, 01:23:10 PM »
Sorry about the bogus links.  meant to post linx to 44's.  I'll pay your suggestions some good thought.
Logged

Offline Old Griz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2030
  • Gender: Male
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2007, 08:53:37 PM »
Like the Boss, I'd avoid the Taurus due to poor quality control and customer service.
As for a hunting .44 mag, a S&W N-frame is a great choice in a double action gun. The Ruger Redhawk is also a great choice. Mine was very accurate, but really heavy. I traded it for a single action Bisley in .44 mag. (I have three now.) Before you make up your mind, go and handle a Bisley and see how you like it. SA guns are a great deal of fun, accurate, easy to clean, and once you get hooked you won't go back!
Logged
Griz
<*}}}><

I Cor. 2.2 "For I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified."

Offline warrior1

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2007, 04:13:07 AM »
i'm partial to ruger in both 357 mag and 44 mag double actions. that bisley in a 44 mag could also be
a good hunting partner,as well as the blackhawk hunter. the 686 also deserves a look. my way of thinking is
any one of the guns mentioned will perform well. good luck with your pick and good shootin. dan
Logged
Dan Deluca aka "warrior1" has passed away.  Dan was a frequent poster here and on several other sites.  He passed away on 12/29/08 from a massive heart attack. RIP Dan.

Offline Archblackmage

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73
  • Gender: Male
    • http://archblackmagi.tripod.com/
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2008, 03:40:21 AM »
see if you can locate a dan wesson in 44mag from either monson or norwich look at gunbroker , gunamerica, and auctionarms they are as strong as a ruger more accurate than a smith and have interchange barrels
Logged
Andrew S. DeCecco

Offline ratgunner

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 663
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2008, 05:28:32 AM »
Smith & Wesson 629. ;D
Logged
"Non Gratum Anus Rodentum"

Offline Drilling Man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3646
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2008, 10:33:21 AM »
  I've owned many of the 44's that have been made over the years, and the best, most accurate 44's i've owned have been the S&W M-29's...  So, of course they get my vote...  Here's the 44's i still own today...



  DM
Logged

Offline dougk

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1937
  • Driftwood TEXAS
Re: HUnt Sidearm
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2008, 07:01:49 PM »
DM
I agree with your choice but Dan Wesson was not listed and I took the .445 Supermag to the range yesterday.  Very accurate and SWEET..... 
The 8 inch barrel has the VX-III 2.5-8 and the 4 inch barrel is ported which really makes it 5 inches.

Here it is with the 4 inch barrel and the 5 inch shroud due to the porting 

Here it is with the 8 inch barrel and scope
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »