There is no doubt in my mind that, in some cases, Remington has had a Quality Control problem over the last 25 years. Some of their problems are also in Design. I bought a brand new 673 last year, and the vented rib ran down the top of the barrel off center. How can that happen? How can a rifle like that make it to the Shipping Dept.? Someone didn't care and OK'd it. A little checking around and I found out that there was a run of 673's with the exact same problem. A problem, that when brought to Remington's attention, was considered... and I quote... "within industry standards".
When you consider that, in the end, the Customer Service Dept. has to contend with all of those short comings, there is no wonder that things can get testy. In some cases, Customer Service may be overwhelmed.
With new ownership, maybe Remington will turn things around. If every Rifle had the same ISO standards as something that leaves the Custom Shop, things would be different. But I think if that would be the case, Remington would finally see that, in most cases, their rifles don't even meet minimum standards and the cost involved may be prohibitive. So the problems have to be addressed from the bottom up.
Without a better Quality Control system, Remington may not have a chance to survive. Surely, the people on the production floor have no voice as to what moves to the next dept, which is a management fault.
So far Remington seems to be taking a chance that some dumb schmuck won't even bother to make things right after the gun is sold.
Hopefully, all this will change with the new ownership.