Author Topic: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS  (Read 1966 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Terry1

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 235
Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« on: December 30, 2006, 07:00:04 AM »
Other than the stock, what are the differences between the 700 BDL and the SPS? I really want the legendary 700 performance, and I don't want to sacrifice quality, but I like the synthetic SPS stock and the price. Thanks.

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2006, 12:13:47 PM »
quality is going to be the same.  ditto for "performance."

Zachary

Offline emsemt911

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 173
Re: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2006, 08:16:18 PM »
that was a simular question I was debating, the lss or sps stainless
I was woriied about a composite stock

Offline jvs

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2006, 10:20:34 PM »
Being the Old Fashioned and Conservative type of person that I am, I would pick the BDL.  The BDL, with its wooden stock, may end up being the Odd Man Out soon, stacked between the SPS, Model 7 and the CDL, it may not survive as you know it.
 If you want to run with the Wolves, you can't Pee with the Puppies.

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2006, 02:28:16 AM »
I don't think so.  The BDL has been around for years and years, and that traditional BDL wood design is timeless.  ;)

Zachary

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2006, 04:07:06 AM »
All my Rems are BDL. I love that wood.

Offline Fast Ed

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2007, 06:07:09 AM »
SPS has a matte finish that doesn't require the polishing hand work of the BDL.  Actions and barrels are the same, off the same machines.  It's finish level that is the only difference.  Matte vs. blue and plastic vs. wood.

Fast Ed

Offline carl425

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2007, 11:08:44 AM »
I bought a SPS stainless to shoot while waiting in line at the gunsmith.  I had originally planned to use the action as a donor for the custom rifle.  Since all I needed was an action, I figured the cheapest 700 was the smart purchase.  The finish on the SPS action convinced me to go with something else.  I have no idea how they got it that way, but it is really unattractive.  I tried to get the smith to polish it out, but he said that after trying that once, he won't attempt another.  This particular rifle (a 7mm08) shoots 1.5" groups at 100 yards with 150 gr Sierra Matchkings and 38 gr of RE-15 - not very good.  I don't know if that accuracy applies to all of them. 

Offline Val

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
Re: Remington 700 BDL Vs. SPS
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2007, 07:43:24 AM »
I don't know how extensively you got into load development, but the accuracy you quote, may be a function of a non optimum load or the bullet seating depth. I have two Remy 700s, one manufactured in 1983 and and a Mountain rifle I purchased last year. They both shoot well under MOA after I develped a proper load.
Hunting and fishing are not matters of life or death. They are much more important than that.