I alluded to this in my reply to USMC Hunter's post re: Savage vs. Browning, but I feel it deserves repeating: I think too much weight is given to a rifle's accuracy or reputation for accuracy when considering a new gun. I've got rifles from Savage, Weatherby, Ruger, and Remington. They're all good shooters; some a little better than others. But without a doubt, every one of them is capable of better accuracy than I can get out of them shooting anywhere other than a bench rest.
Especially for new shooters soliciting advice on this forum, we need to emphasize factors such as:
- How important is controlled round feeding vs. push feed?
- What kind of recoil pad does it have?
- How is the trigger, and can you adjust it or do you need to buy a replacement to lighten it?
- Raised cheekpiece? Monte carlo style stock?
- Blued or stainless? Walnut, laminate, or composite?
- Do you want open sights?
- Warranty and reputation for quality
- Hinged floorplate, detachable mag, or blind magazine?
- 3 or 2 position safety? Tang or behind the bolt safety?
- light, medium, or heavy weight?
- Do you like the look of it?
- Slim grip or fat grip w/ palmswell?
These all affect how the rifle fits and functions. Given that except for the occasional lemon that for whatever reason won't shoot straight (I'll save which company makes more lemons than others for another posting), all major manufacturer's guns will shoot better than most of us can, so I think more weight should be given to the above factors.