Author Topic: bigfoot pictures---the truth. (Read 9705 times)

bullet maker · « **on:** March 20, 2006, 11:28:48 PM »

Hey guy`s go to (gulf coast bigfoot research organization), for the lastest on my pictures, The moderator wanted me to come clean, so I did, Interesting read. Also read the comments up and down near my post. It will give you some insight and the trouble makers that was put in their place.

bullet maker

NONYA · « **Reply #1 on:** March 21, 2006, 12:40:47 AM »

BM I went and looked I cant f9ind your post!!

Graybeard · « **Reply #2 on:** March 21, 2006, 03:51:38 AM »

If you want "us" to see it copy and paste it here.

FOsteology · « **Reply #3 on:** March 21, 2006, 03:57:11 AM »

I don't see it on GCBRO. How about just posting it here??

bullet maker · « **Reply #4 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:15:01 AM »

Yeah, give em till this afternoon, I dont know why its not posted on their yet. ? Cause the moderator seemed to want me to post an explaination, so I did, But sometimes stuff dont get prove read and posted quickly over their. Basically, Its the right pictures but, yeah da yeahda, youll see, just wait till its. posted,If its not posted here soon I post on here the story.

OK?

bullet maker

379 Peterbilt · « **Reply #5 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:41:51 AM »

BM

Why is it so hard to just post your pics here at GBO?? We have been diverted to 2 diff websites in the last 2 days, to view these pics, only to find out one must have an account just to see the pics.

You would think that there would be one person out there that has an account at GCBRO AND here at GBO. That one single person could easily IMG the pics here for us.

This is not rokcettt sci-ennse.

Is this not a reasonable request or what???

Thanks

bullet maker · « **Reply #6 on:** March 21, 2006, 06:59:38 AM »

Quote from: 379 Peterbilt

BM

Why is it so hard to just post your pics here at GBO?? We have been diverted to 2 diff websites in the last 2 days, to view these pics, only to find out one must have an account just to see the pics.

You would think that there would be one person out there that has an account at GCBRO AND here at GBO. That one single person could easily IMG the pics here for us.

This is not rokcettt sci-ennse.

Is this not a reasonable request or what???

Thanks

379 Peterbilt

I dont post mine cause I dont have it copy writed yet. As far as the illegal one floating all around the bigfoot rooms, I dont belong to any of them, and I didnt post any on them as well.

I think I know what you asking, but I dont have the knowledge to do that.

Hello NONYA---COME IN ----OVER.

Now heres the guy that can answer that question, and do about anything with a computor. Did you see the ones he posted of the Henderson ape, that was classic

bullet maker

bullet maker · « **Reply #7 on:** March 21, 2006, 07:01:20 AM »

I meant to say I dont post pictures on the other site`s, not that I dont post stories sometimes.

thanks

bullet maker

WmRoy · « **Reply #8 on:** March 21, 2006, 07:17:03 AM »

deleted duplicate

WmRoy · « **Reply #9 on:** March 21, 2006, 07:18:57 AM »

http://www.bigfootforums.com/uploads//post-189-1142947511_thumb.jpg

379 Peterbilt · « **Reply #10 on:** March 21, 2006, 11:18:04 AM »

Got it Bullet Maker. Ok, I was under the impression you posted them elsewhere and not here. My mistake..

Thanks for clearing that up

WmRoy · « **Reply #11 on:** March 21, 2006, 12:29:34 PM »

Can someone point out the Bigfoot in that photo for me??? I'm going to have to get my glasses updated I guess?

:shock:

bullet maker · « **Reply #12 on:** March 21, 2006, 12:36:05 PM »

Quote from: NONYA

BM I went and looked I cant f9ind your post!!

Here is the post from GCBRO that i think that you are asking for.

Hi Moderator

Yes I will explain- I dont know how to start, but let me say, I had a bad feeling about the picture for a long time. Like I stated in the above answer to (I think it was James), I didnt like all the bad press from three of the individuals, what they said about me with the personal attacks and the defamation of my character, and my picture. You-all had been reading what was said,for weeks, before I even went to the offending site`s and they wouldn`t let me post to protect myself, I knew the guilty party`was untrustworthy, so I gave them the worst copies I had. I knew in my heart they would try to stick me in the back and they have.

THE PICTURE POSTED IS REAL: However, you can not make out dilly squat. Thats because of the way I made it out for them. Now the negative, and picture that I have from the negative, is clear, Like I posted up in a statement above, its going to cost me $785.00 to have it copywrited, Yes I found an attorney in Tulsa, Okla. to do it. Now I wouldn`t spend that much money on a beaver, or skunk or any other animal to fake it out as the real thing I`m so sure about the real picture, that I`m letting M.K. Davis do the honors of checking it, and doing his thing on it. (And by the way M.K. I heard you were gone for a week, but I`ve left 3 messages on your answering macine, so when you get back in town, call me, thanks).

Since one of the trouble makers, said it was a beaver, on another site, I went along with them, but the truth is, it is the real picture, only a very-very bad one. Like I said, I`ve got the good one. I havent tried to defraud anybody, if you all remember I was the one that said I would sue, whoever posted the picture. Their was such a clammer from all the trouble that the trouble makers drummed up, that nobody listened to me.

So now everybody is stuck with a horrible picture, but dont be dismayed, when its done right the orginal will be posted on all the sites. Yes the baby is on the right shoulder of the big black momma bigfoot. You`ll have to take 2x magnifaction to see it. However with such a poor copy, you may not cause it may be blurred. On my original, (M.K.) will be able to tell, I think I see a head of another make bigfoot, hugh eyeguards, and muzzle. I`m just guessing on that part, only M.K. will tale.

In ending, might I add that I didnt have to tell this, but I have respect for Bobby Hamilton, so I came to tell the whole story. I might add that all the sights, before the postings, got hugh readerships. And I might add it let everybody know who the real trouble makers and fools are. They are one and the same.

Thank You

444

Hope this helps

bullet maker · « **Reply #13 on:** March 21, 2006, 12:40:13 PM »

Quote from: WmRoy

Can someone point out the Bigfoot in that photo for me??? I'm going to have to get my glasses updated I guess? :shock:

That is because the three stooges are the ones that posted it without my permission that is not the good clear picture that I have, but a bootleged picture.

Bulletmaker

Graybeard · « **Reply #14 on:** March 21, 2006, 12:40:29 PM »

Quote

Can someone point out the Bigfoot in that photo for me???

Nope. :oops: As I told BM when I was at his house looking at the actual photograph I just didn't see it as he does. His photo is a much better image than the poor quality of the posted copy. Still I just don't see in it what he does and so stated during my visit to him.

But until he gets here and responds I will tell you what he told me to the best of my recollection.

The big black blob that makes up most of the photo is what he says is the parent bigfoot. I think that's supposed to be the upper back and head area of it. To the right of the image one of the two "knots" you might see protruding above the line of the larger black blob is what he says is the head of the baby. I just don't see it.

The upper one when blown up in Adobe Photoshop is clearly just limbs. Can't see any additional detail in the lower protrusion tho. If he ever posts a better copy from his photo you'll have a better idea of what it really looks like, the quality of this one just isn't good enough. Still as I say I saw his photo and I don't personally see the same as Doug sees.

NONYA · « **Reply #15 on:** March 21, 2006, 01:34:03 PM »

From what I can see it looks liike the photo was taken from ground level,whats up with that?Im a profesional photographer and it doesnt cost a single dime to protect your photo with a © symbol,you just have to place it ,a date and your name over the photo before you post it.That attorney is rippin you off. :-D

propredator · « **Reply #16 on:** March 21, 2006, 02:05:13 PM »

I tryed to see a bigfoot in the pic,i tryed hard.Maybe too hard.What i cant understand what apears to be a tree limb or rock that comes from the lower right into the center of the pic.Some thing fuzzy seems to be hanging over part of it.when i start looking at this enough i start to see the shape of a gray fox standing on it looking over its right shoulder.Take a good look at it.It maybe its just from the blured image.Thats another thing that bothers me,every deer camera pic i have seen when there is a flash show the animal very brightly.Unless it is like 30 yards out or more from the camera.If this is a digital deer cam of some kind and was light enough maybe it didnt flash?
Maybe bullet makers pic is a lot clearer,but from the one i see i think you have a pic of a grey fox,they have been know to climb trees.hopefully bulletmakers pic will have a more clear a lighted creature.

bullet maker · « **Reply #17 on:** March 21, 2006, 02:12:50 PM »

Hi NONYA

well there`s more to it than just the copyrite, but cant talk about that at this moment.

And for Graybeard and other people that cant make out the bootleg photo, as to where on the picture everything is suppose to be, the baby and all. I cant help you with that, I didnt give permission for it to be published to begin with, and that`s a very bad picture. I quarantee, when I publish the orginal picture, (and that wont be for at least 2 weeks) you wont have any diffuculty at all seeing what`s what`s.

Bullet maker

jpred1 · « **Reply #18 on:** March 21, 2006, 02:37:06 PM »

I think I can make it out.Im assumming it is very close to camera and is walking away,with a distinct limb between it and camera.BM you need a beter camera,maybe a good digital.That seems to be a 35mm and I left mine hanging on tree after buying an digital.What state were these taken in?

WmRoy · « **Reply #19 on:** March 21, 2006, 04:07:57 PM »

Quote

I quarantee, when I publish the orginal picture, (and that wont be for at least 2 weeks) you wont have any diffuculty at all seeing what`s what`s.

Since Graybeard has already said he couldn't see it in an original photo please excuse me for NOT holding my breath.

:?

Very disappointing there BM......... :cry:

bullet maker · « **Reply #20 on:** March 21, 2006, 04:46:20 PM »

Quote from: jpred1

I think I can make it out.Im assumming it is very close to camera and is walking away,with a distinct limb between it and camera.BM you need a beter camera,maybe a good digital.That seems to be a 35mm and I left mine hanging on tree after buying an digital.What state were these taken in?

Yea those digital camera`s are very nice. I saw some pictures that a friend has, taken from a digital, and they were fantastic. But unfortunaly, I cant afford one right now. All my money is going to have the picture copyrited :twisted:

bullet maker

bullet maker · « **Reply #21 on:** March 21, 2006, 04:52:08 PM »

Quote from: WmRoy

Quote
I quarantee, when I publish the orginal picture, (and that wont be for at least 2 weeks) you wont have any diffuculty at all seeing what`s what`s.

Since Graybeard has already said he couldn't see it in an original photo please excuse me for NOT holding my breath.

:?

Very disappointing there BM......... :cry:

Hi WmRoy

I`m glad you are disappointed, now let me explain why i said that. Because if it was a perfect picture, it would be long gone and stolen from me and given or stolen toevery bigfoot sight from here to china. I had explained in earlier post why it (the picture) is no good. That `s what the thiefs get for posting a bad copy, without my permission. Dont blame me---go blame D.G. Griffin. If everybody is blaming me, then who is the real culprit, not I, I didnt give permission. According to the Kiamichi, site. D.G. gave that permission. So go get a rope and string him up.

bullet maker

NONYA · « **Reply #22 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:08:39 PM »

Why dont you do everyone a favor and not mention them again until your going to post them,this is a neverendeding line of BS that gets deeper by the day... :roll:

WmRoy · « **Reply #23 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:12:35 PM »

Quote from: NONYA

Why dont you do everyone a favor and not mention them again until your going to post them,this is a neverendeding line of BS that gets deeper by the day... :roll:

Man I think I just felt the Magnetic Poles of the Earth Shift......... nah..... it was something even more surprising.......... I agreed with Nonya.............

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

bullet maker · « **Reply #24 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:21:04 PM »

OK, ok :oops: I`ll just take my little wagon and go back home with my little teddy bear riding in the back , and suck my thumb

I got my feelings hurt :m: :m: by WmRoy----by,by, NONYA---maybe I can come over tomorrow and play.

bullet maker

just jokeing

NONYA · « **Reply #25 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:22:38 PM »

See anything is possible Wm! :eek:

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #26 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:50:23 PM »

I don't recall D.G. mentioning that it was not a BF nor did he say it was. Apparently, neither did Greybeard. Does that make him (GB) a liar as well???

BTW, a thief is someone who takes property w/o permission. Best I recollect (from that evening) you freely gave out (original) copies to several folks. How does that constitute stealing?

Take Nonya's advice and shut up until you have something tangible (such as pictures that maybe you've had time to photoshop?) for this running battle drivel of yours is fooling few and annoying many.

WmRoy · « **Reply #27 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:50:57 PM »

Quote from: NONYA

See anything is possible Wm! :eek:

Even Bigfoot........... :-D :-D :-D :-D :wink:

bullet maker · « **Reply #28 on:** March 21, 2006, 05:59:46 PM »

Quote from: Telahnay's g'son

I don't recall D.G. mentioning that it was not a BF nor did he say it was. Apparently, neither did Greybeard. Does that make him (GB) a liar as well???

BTW, a thief is someone who takes property w/o permission. Best I recollect (from that evening) you freely gave out (original) copies to several folks. How does that constitute stealing?

Take Nonya's advice and shut up until you have something tangible (such as pictures that maybe you've had time to photoshop?) for this running battle drivel of yours is fooling few and annoying many.

Nobody was given permission to post anything---you forgot that didnt you? It was anagreement we all made. Remember now?
Why do you alway try to descredit me? You have been barred from one site that I know of, and you was put down over at G.C.B.R.O. last night.
You and the other 2 were the discussion of the evening. by the way.

good night , I`d rather no talk to you. go away. you pester me like a knat.

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #29 on:** March 21, 2006, 06:10:13 PM »

Remember guys I myself and some others in this thread have seen the actual photograph not this somewhat blurred copy of it. But I see nothing in the one posted here to make me think it was altered in some photo edited program to make it worse. It is a copy of the original image, the original that I saw was an 8"x10" blow up. Whether it is or isn't the full negative I don't know. I didn't see any images of his at less than 8x10 size so do not know if he had all printed initially at the larger size or if there are some from the initial development and printing that are smaller.

This image in this thread is quite a bit more blurred and of far less quality than the photo I saw at his house. Some of the stuff you "think" you see are part of that blur. It is my understanding this image here was not made from the photo but from a copier made copy of it or at least I think that's what it is.

I dumped in it into Adobe Photoshop last night and blew it up pretty big. It is clear when you do that the upper of the two protrusions is just some limbs. They actually clear up pretty decent at magnification. The other lumb lower down on the right maybe the one he explained to me was a baby's head.

But even looking at the original he showed me I could see no evidence anything in the photo was a living creature of any kind much less a parent and infant. That's not to say it isn't, just that I saw nothing to make me think it was.

I think that the vast majority of people even those who believe bigfoot exists and who want to see evidence of it in this image would say it was merely blobsquatch if they helld his original in hand.

I examined it under magnification to find the details he mentioned and I just couldn't see them. The person with me on the visit also failed to see anything in the image.

He now claims it will be at least two more weeks before he personally officially releases the photo giving no reasons for the delay but did mention it was more than just his copyright concerns.

Personally I think he believes what he says to be true. I also think he wants it to be true so hard that he has convinced himself of the truth of it. However I do not believe the photo shows a bigfoot adult or infant. That's as open and honest as I can be with you based on my own personal examination of the images he has.

Again Graybeard posting on my son's account since I can't seem to get registered or logged in on my own.