Author Topic: deer cam (Read 9122 times)

bullet maker · « **Reply #30 on:** March 06, 2006, 07:49:28 AM »

OK guys, iez44, cvixx, WmRoy, and NONYA.

I just finished talking to National Geographic and am waiting for them to call me back on the copyright issue.. Then, they requested the photo`s to view.

Anyhow thats happened so far. you guys get to lining up the big bucks

I`m hanging by the phone.

bullt maker

Ol' Man Mountain · « **Reply #31 on:** March 06, 2006, 09:53:42 AM »

Hi Bullet Maker,

I just went in and answered the private message you left me.
Hope it all works out for you with those photos.
Watch out for them claim jumpers hiding in the shadows.

Matt · « **Reply #32 on:** March 06, 2006, 07:46:16 PM »

ok fixed it..... now everone should be able to read this post...

you can blame it on ol' Mountian Man.... it was the ' in his nick that cause the problem.... :x

nah... just playin :-D it was the ' in his nick but it was becuase the writers of the new software forgot to escape special charactors in the usernames and catagories and every where else not in the descriptions for the ad... so I will have to fix this... it was already brought to my attention about catagories but had no clue about username... temp fix in place and will get to it in a day or so...

Matt

bullet maker · « **Reply #33 on:** March 06, 2006, 08:08:43 PM »

OK thanks Matt

bullet maker

NONYA · « **Reply #34 on:** March 07, 2006, 06:13:28 AM »

Hey Bm wouldnt it be wierd if you took your medication and relized that everyone that has ever came foward with "bigfoot" pics has been proven to be either a phony or just a sadly confused person?

bullet maker · « **Reply #35 on:** March 07, 2006, 03:14:56 PM »

Quote from: NONYA

Hey Bm wouldnt it be wierd if you took your medication and relized that everyone that has ever came foward with "bigfoot" pics has been proven to be either a phony or just a sadly confused person?

Hey NONYA buisness

Have you looked in the mirror lately. :eek: :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

Edited by Graybeard. You crossed a line with that one. A line we DON'T wanna cross again. Nuff said! GB

bullet maker

NONYA · « **Reply #36 on:** March 07, 2006, 03:59:02 PM »

WOW BM you have completly derailed,i dont know what you are talking about,but I got a laugh out of it anywho.

wijim · « **Reply #37 on:** March 08, 2006, 04:15:16 AM »

Quote from: shooter

I've got a cheapo deercam set out over top of a 70lb deer carcass.I checked it last thur and the film was all used up,nothing hitting it but crows so far.I added new film and checked it again sunday.Now there were 10 pictures taken and the deer had been dragged about 30 yrds to the north further into the field.So,sunday i dragged the almost complete deer back to the area i had it in and set up on a slightly differant tree/angle.Now at this point some of the butt had been chewed on and the rib cage was exposed.Tracks suggest coyote.Good,thats what i was trying to get pics of.I already had two pics of a single large coyote in this field.Well,i went back thur this week and the deer was GONE ! WOW,i checked my camera and it appears like no additional pictures had been taken in the last 4 days since i move the carcass back.I followed a path of hair and small bits of bone for about 80 yrds across the field before i lost the trail.I then scoured the entire immeidate area for sign,found none.Okay fellas,question.Did these coyotes totally move this deer in some sort of joint effort or did a bear ? there is a small one working this area but i thought i'd be in hibernation.I just cant believe a coyote dragged this carcass off out of sight.What do you think ?
I suppose,if i go back sunday and retrieve the film,perhaps atleast one photo will show the culprit.The camera was set to take one pic every 15 minutes but i dont think it took any.P.S. yes,i tested it and it took my picture this morning so i know the batteries/camera are working.
Shooter

around here in wi. the bears have been up quite a bit due to the mild winter. they will drag off a carcass very often and hide it like a squirrel hidin nuts. black bears need to be closer to a camera than alot of other animals because they are black and dont reflect as much heat with their winter coat. could be why you aren't seein lots of photos.

NONYA · « **Reply #38 on:** March 08, 2006, 06:53:59 AM »

either that or its a mythalogical,shapshifting,mindreading,telepathic,super intellegent primate that depends on finding dead dear carcass's in order to survive.Hmmmm

whodywho · « **Reply #39 on:** March 09, 2006, 06:37:12 AM »

stranger things have happened!

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #40 on:** March 15, 2006, 01:16:43 AM »

I understand the (alleged) BF/baby pic is in process of being posted up on another site. Perhaps, this will clarify the situation a bit better?

It's a real shame for what has happened (IMHO) to BM's place the past couple of years. With all the residential development (north, south & east) around his place (~180 acres) the incidence of BF* activity has fallen off dramatically.

BTW, a couple of questions for any of y'all legal types;

Is it kosher to have a vehicle towed (in some cases off FEDERAL property) w/o LE authorization?

Is it kosher to claim domain over the whole of an access road even though your property line stops in the MIDDLE of it?

Inquiring minds want to know!

* BF is the term applied to a currently unknown entity yet to be definitively identified via forensic science.

Sasquatch · « **Reply #41 on:** March 15, 2006, 06:18:40 AM »

Hey Telahnay's g'son- Do you know what site his pics are being posted on?

Teufelwald · « **Reply #42 on:** March 15, 2006, 07:22:44 AM »

Y'all take this stuff a little to serious... imho

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #43 on:** March 15, 2006, 09:19:53 AM »

Quote from: Sasquatch

Hey Telahnay's g'son- Do you know what site his pics are being posted on?

Kiamichi Bigfoot Research (s3.invisionfree.com)

WmRoy · « **Reply #44 on:** March 15, 2006, 11:04:24 AM »

It appears that you have to register to access the site....... can you copy the photos over here???

Graybeard · « **Reply #45 on:** March 15, 2006, 12:39:09 PM »

Quote

It's a real shame for what has happened (IMHO) to BM's place the past couple of years. With all the residential development (north, south & east) around his place (~180 acres) the incidence of BF* activity has fallen off dramatically.

What exactly is that supposed to mean? Have you been there? Have you seen his place? If so what development are we talking about. I must have missed it when I was there in June. I saw one place that was likely new in the past two years and it might not have been that new. It was on the other side of the highway he lives on. Behind him is a large area of National Forest I believe he said it was, government land at least and no development. Just don't understand what and for sure not on three sides that you're referring to.

NONYA · « **Reply #46 on:** March 15, 2006, 01:25:25 PM »

Anyone know what user name the photos might be posted under on that site?

NONYA · « **Reply #47 on:** March 15, 2006, 01:35:54 PM »

I found a thread over there that backs up everything I thought about the deal from the beggining,he was banned from that site for being rude and breaking forum rules,i doubthe will be posting pics of BlobSquatch any time soon.
http://s3.invisionfree.com/Kiamichi_Giants/index.php?showtopic=1079

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #48 on:** March 15, 2006, 06:29:40 PM »

Quote from: Graybeard

Quote
It's a real shame for what has happened (IMHO) to BM's place the past couple of years. With all the residential development (north, south & east) around his place (~180 acres) the incidence of BF* activity has fallen off dramatically.

What exactly is that supposed to mean? Have you been there? Have you seen his place? If so what development are we talking about. I must have missed it when I was there in June. I saw one place that was likely new in the past two years and it might not have been that new. It was on the other side of the highway he lives on. Behind him is a large area of National Forest I believe he said it was, government land at least and no development. Just don't understand what and for sure not on three sides that you're referring to.

Was there (area) this evening adjacent to his place. Absolutely no activity at all on his bottomland tract but we did get a show ~1/2 mile away @~21:00 HRS.

The 90 acres SSW of him sold ~2.5 yrs. ago and the 40 acres on his north side sold ~1.5 yrs. ago and ~60 acres ESE sold a little over a year ago. Between all of these parcels, there are seven new homes built or being built. The lands immediately to the west of him (~3K acres) are federal property.

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #49 on:** March 15, 2006, 06:31:46 PM »

Quote from: NONYA

I found a thread over there that backs up everything I thought about the deal from the beggining,he was banned from that site for being rude and breaking forum rules,i doubthe will be posting pics of BlobSquatch any time soon.
http://s3.invisionfree.com/Kiamichi_Giants/index.php?showtopic=1079

RTFP, I didn't say he (BM) would be posting the pictures. There are others with copies of said.

NONYA · « **Reply #50 on:** March 15, 2006, 06:52:03 PM »

Well lets see the damn things... :roll:

bullet maker · « **Reply #51 on:** March 16, 2006, 02:46:41 AM »

Quote from: NONYA

I found a thread over there that backs up everything I thought about the deal from the beggining,he was banned from that site for being rude and breaking forum rules,i doubthe will be posting pics of BlobSquatch any time soon.
http://s3.invisionfree.com/Kiamichi_Giants/index.php?showtopic=1079

OK OK, I got to respond to this-----I have sat quiet enough----if you got the evedience, Nonya that I was kicked off the said above board, copy and past over here for everyone to see. If I been kicked off, I don`t know a thank about it. I was surfing on their last night, looking for my pictures to be posted, Illegal, I might add, their will be a lawsuit, to follow if they are.
The reason I say post it over here, is because alot of the guy`s from here cant get on it free, like you can here on this site. Well yes it is free, but you have to register, to get on.
One of the site administrator of that site is a guy named (Woodswatcher) which is a very close friend of Telahnay`sg`son, that post on here, bad things about me.
You got the pictures now?

bullet maker

bullet maker · « **Reply #52 on:** March 16, 2006, 03:05:09 AM »

Quote from: Telahnay's g'son

Quote from: Graybeard
Quote
It's a real shame for what has happened (IMHO) to BM's place the past couple of years. With all the residential development (north, south & east) around his place (~180 acres) the incidence of BF* activity has fallen off dramatically.

What exactly is that supposed to mean? Have you been there? Have you seen his place? If so what development are we talking about. I must have missed it when I was there in June. I saw one place that was likely new in the past two years and it might not have been that new. It was on the other side of the highway he lives on. Behind him is a large area of National Forest I believe he said it was, government land at least and no development. Just don't understand what and for sure not on three sides that you're referring to.

Was there (area) this evening adjacent to his place. Absolutely no activity at all on his bottomland tract but we did get a show ~1/2 mile away @~21:00 HRS.

The 90 acres SSW of him sold ~2.5 yrs. ago and the 40 acres on his north side sold ~1.5 yrs. ago and ~60 acres ESE sold a little over a year ago. Between all of these parcels, there are seven new homes built or being built. The lands immediately to the west of him (~3K acres) are federal property.

If you were adjacent to my property as you said, I didnt see you, It was dark and 30 M.P.H. wind, . Up on the hill was a kill again last night, you know the bone whistle call`s with answer`s from the canyon, and then the bleeting of cattle running and one of them sounding like it got its, throut cul.
You talk about others haveing the pictures, what others? the only ones, that I know of is you, D.G. and maybe Todd.
I`ll tell you one more time. If those pictures are posted anywhere, on anysite, especially your buddies (Woodwatcher) site, I well sue. Your be the first one that gets papers. Those are my pictures.
Now I`ve been silent to long, if you got a personal thing against me, then call me :twisted: :twisted: dont go throwing you trash on this board or anyother board about me. Yeah, if you guy`s go over to the G.C.B.R.O. board, you`ll see him and his buddies, said so much trash, that the site administrator, told them to stop.
Now the last thing, where do you come off telling about the build up of my surrounding property? I`m like greybeard, what build up? and you said theirs very little bigfoot auctivity, because of it. Well if their`s little auctivity, then why was you out in this area last night ?

OK, greaybeard, I got my say so, sorry, about haveing to bring up some trash, and I hope you allow me to take up for myself.

bullet maker

bullet maker · « **Reply #53 on:** March 16, 2006, 03:13:29 AM »

Quote from: Graybeard

Quote
It's a real shame for what has happened (IMHO) to BM's place the past couple of years. With all the residential development (north, south & east) around his place (~180 acres) the incidence of BF* activity has fallen off dramatically.

What exactly is that supposed to mean? Have you been there? Have you seen his place? If so what development are we talking about. I must have missed it when I was there in June. I saw one place that was likely new in the past two years and it might not have been that new. It was on the other side of the highway he lives on. Behind him is a large area of National Forest I believe he said it was, government land at least and no development. Just don't understand what and for sure not on three sides that you're referring to.

Thanks Graybeard, your the only one, that even challenged him about his untrue statements, You are correct, its just like it always have been, Yes there is a trailor on down about a mile away, but the rest of his statements, about all the build-ups around here is the same people, thats been here for 30 yrs. They just got new trailers, and built theirself a barn or two. That doesnt mean there`s a million people out here. If and when that does happen, I`ll be selling out and moving to the panhandle of Okla.
He for some unkown reason other than himself, seems to be putting me down on this site, and I dont like it. Like I told him, send me a p.m., or just pick up the telephone, he only lives 40 minutes away, and its not longdistance, to call.

bullet maker

bullet maker · « **Reply #54 on:** March 16, 2006, 03:45:47 AM »

Quote from: Telahnay's g'son

I understand the (alleged) BF/baby pic is in process of being posted up on another site. Perhaps, this will clarify the situation a bit better?

It's a real shame for what has happened (IMHO) to BM's place the past couple of years. With all the residential development (north, south & east) around his place (~180 acres) the incidence of BF* activity has fallen off dramatically.

BTW, a couple of questions for any of y'all legal types;

Is it kosher to have a vehicle towed (in some cases off FEDERAL property) w/o LE authorization?

Is it kosher to claim domain over the whole of an access road even though your property line stops in the MIDDLE of it?

Inquiring minds want to know!

* BF is the term applied to a currently unknown entity yet to be definitively identified via forensic science.

You still trying to slam me Telahnay`sg`son :twisted: I`ve answered your question about the access, myself before, face to fact, remember?
Now I`ll tell you one more time, Their is a state or maybe its a county law, thats states, If the said road, is not improved in the last 7 years, and it is not a through road, the road reverts back to the property owners.This road Telahnay`g`son, hasnt been graded or improved in over the 18 years, I`ve lived out their.
So Telgson, if you want to challenge me on it, you go down their and park, I promise to have you towed.
You see laddies and gentlemen, their is another access to the public lands, its on the west side, and the public lands, is foot access only. Mr Telgson, wants to have an easier way in and just to pester me, cause I own the other side of it.

bullet maker

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #55 on:** March 16, 2006, 04:51:23 AM »

1. Was within 50 yards of #7 stand and observed your new "No Trespassing" signs with a couple of them on federal property as #6 stand still is which hasn't been moved per the demand of COE officials ~3 years ago.

2. There were no cattle calling last night whatsoever, at least until 22:00 HRS.

3. Are you saying you own 100% of the aforementioned road? Or, is it more like only the north half as the county commissioner told me last summer?

4. I don't have a copy of your (alleged) "BF/baby" picture so how could I post it on another site? Others do though which you had given to them w/o any restrictions.

5. Tow me off of federal property (w/o LE authorization) especially after I did not trespass on ANY of your property and I WILL OWN the 100 acres which will settle things for once and all.

6. There are two new residences (mobile homes) directly to the north of you, two stickbuilt homes going up to the ENE with a third platted out and three new homes within a mile to your south. Most of these have gone in SINCE greybeard's visit last summer.

I didn't start this pizzing contest, you did in particular after boasting of pictures superior to the P/G film and your past belligerent behavior on the bottomland access road with others. Surely, you didn't think (as you've boasted to several individuals about) pointing a firearm at coonhunters, booby trapping a road on federal property, vandalizing vehicles and poisoning neighbors' dogs was inappropriate behavior?

D.G. · « **Reply #56 on:** March 16, 2006, 04:54:24 AM »

Graybeard, with all due respect I have to agree with the statements about the viability of the property and the development in that area. You were there one time for a short period. I am over on the corp of engineers land west of Bulletmakers at least twice a week. for the last 4 years.
Did you meet any of the Hillbilly neighbors that Bulletmaker waxed so eloquently about on this very site? The ones with the clean barefoot children that bring the jug out and sit around the campfire or the old Indian medicine man? Just like out of a "Foxfire" book.
I haven't either, and I was raised in and roamed that area since 1972.
Food for thought.

bullet maker · « **Reply #57 on:** March 16, 2006, 05:09:13 AM »

You know the half truths and inuendos are really pathetic on this. TGS mentioned property that has sold around us.1--90 acres SSW of us, true it was sold and the home that was there is where the people live no new one built, 2-- 60 acres ESE was sold to a local cattle rancher to increase his rather large 2 1/2 section holdings, and nothing is benig built on it nor are there plans for anything to be built. 3--40 acres N was sold and a newer double wide trailer brought in to REPLACE the older one that was there. There are NOT 7 new homes that have been built. Any properties that have been sold around here are strictly new people replacing the ones that have left, with the exception of 1 and that was a mobile home moved in on the 40 acres N of us which housed the elderly parents of the people who own the property. So as you can see the whole story makes a little difference in the way things sound and they are.
Mrs. Bulletmaker

Telahnay's g'son · « **Reply #58 on:** March 16, 2006, 05:16:53 AM »

Half-truths, innuendo?

Nope, just telling the facts as I see them.

Cattle land?...geez, those "barns" look an awful lot like your typical 3BR brick FHA home?

How much of that road do you own??? :eek:

woodswatcher · « **Reply #59 on:** March 16, 2006, 05:20:20 AM »

now this is funny...
i dont care who you are...

housing of various types and land manipulation has been going on steadily in the past couple of years..

there is no NATIONAL FOREST within 100 miles of BM's land.

the only land that borders him is either private property or federal land owned by the Army Corps of Engineers for flood control ( available for fishing and hunting) and some state department of wildife land for public hunting.

there are several people ( some of which ar lurkers here or post here) that know a HELLUVA lot about the area..

dont believe everything you see on the internet...