Maybe I've mentioned this gripe before, but it just seems to me that a rifle manufacturer who sells his rifles without iron sights ought to have a scope base machined in as an integral part of the receiver. Ruger, Tikka, and Sako are right on in this regard. Why don't other manufacturers follow suit?
Also, I always prefer to install a one piece base on my rifles (I don't own any Ruger, Tikka, or Sakos). I just figured it's a more accurate set up. Is this the case, or doesn't it matter on anything other than a benchrest rig?
Your thoughts . . . .