:cb2: Sorry, I was just thinking that with the .357 you'd have:
535 ft.# of energy with a 158-gr bullet, and that would vary with all the different weights out there for .357s. If that isn't enough to float your boat, there's always the 180, 187, & 200-gr. slugs. Drop down to a 148, 140, 130, 125, 110-gr. if the 158 is too much. (I believe I mentioned "versatility.")
A .45 would have about 333 ft.# of energy with a 230-gr. bullet.
Then if the situation arose that you needed even less, the .38+P would give you around 278 ft.# and the .38 Sp. down to about 200 ft.# (both with 158-gr bullets). If using the "trail gun" to hunt rabbits or something to put in the cook pot you wouldn't need magnum loads. However, I would trust the .357 to stop something dangerous more than I would the .45 ACP (the exception being 2-legged dangerous, then any of them would work).
As for the S&W being pricy, well ya get what you pay for. Some folks spend more and drive a Lexus, some settle for Ford Escorts. :eek:
Heck, a 3" Ruger SP101 would be a great small, compact trail gun.
After all, Pinkerton asked if his wife would be better off with a .45, or a .38/.357 for a trail/home defense gun. I was just voting for the .357. (And I understand how jealous Taurus folks are of S&W guns! :-D)
