Author Topic: How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hunting season?  (Read 9870 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dcnewyork

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hunting season?
« on: December 12, 2005, 05:01:17 PM »
I picked up a ATR-100 in .270win, I decided to give it a try based on the good reviews I saw on this board and the write up in american rifleman. I got it a few days before deer season started, put on a scope ( simmons 4-12x40A.O.) did a quick bore sight. Took it to the range, with out even touching the dials it shot a nice MOA group about 1.5 inches high at 100 yards with win 130g cx-2's. Rem corlokt were about 1 inch low at the same range. I shot from a few diff ranges, it was a very easy rifle to get used too, trigger was great at first and only got better as i worked it in.
Well I dragged, droped, banged, bumped and hauled that rifle through the woods and brush for the whole season. I got my buck with a sweet 100 yard shot, it was running full throttle through a hedge row. it droped with a shot to the lungs right behind the sholder. I have to say that it has not had a single problem or issue. The "cheap, sprayed on looking" coating did not rub off as some predicted, it did not even scratch. The trigger is awsome, light crisp, smooth. I am supprised that such a cheap gun can be so great. i would recomend it to anyone. I have not heard of anyone else's reports about how well they held up in the hunting enviroment. courious to see how all the other ones worked.
The only reason I bought the gun was because of the fact that we were allowed to use rifles for the first time here in NY. I have a SMLE No.4  I sporterized when I was 13 ( my parents did not buy me $$$$$$ guns). I made it into an enforcer clone, and it looks pretty cool. Well i have always used 175g BTHP's, which shoot MOA but are not good for deer. I tried 150g ( win, fed, horn) factory loads and could not keep it in 6''. I did not have the time to cook up a handload, so I bought the Mossberg. The funny thing is, i sold another SMLE I had kicking around to a friend for $60 he went and bought 180g win's. I had never tried these becasue I thought that they were round nose like the 180 rems. and i considered them too heavy, but boy do they shoot out of my SMLE. I am glad that I never tried those 180's untill i had already bought the mossberg or else I would have never gone and bought a new gun. I guess I got lucky with my ignorance. I would recomend the ATR to anyone, great gun at a great price.

Offline Norseman112

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 871
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2005, 05:24:29 AM »
Well my son got a big doe with his ATR 30-06 this rifle is a sub moa shooter. The doe was  about 80 yards, he shot and I got to watch him do it .  :grin:


John

Offline dcnewyork

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
atr-100
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2005, 06:21:20 AM »
did he just take it out one time ? was he very gentle with it ? how many shots has he put through it? has it gotten wet? has it gotten dirty? any feeding problems? does it like different brands and weights of ammo? was it affected by dirt? ...... any gun is accurate if taken care of and treated with kid gloves, i wanted something that would take a beating and keep on ticking. i know it has only been one season .... but i took it out. i took mine out every day i could, which was 15 days total, it covererd a lot of miles. it only got one chance to draw blood, but did what it was asked perfectly when given the chance!

Offline PEPAW

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2005, 06:25:57 AM »
Any reason you picked the ATR over the Stevens 200?   The Stevens has a perfect rep so far with a cheaper price.

Glad to hear your experiences have been all good.

pepaw

Offline dcnewyork

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
ATR-100
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2005, 08:29:40 AM »
I did not really like the way that the stevens fit my build, i am 5'9 162#. i also did not like the trigger on the stevens, nor did i like the feel of the stock. As far as the cost goes i got the moss for $240. and the stevens was $279. I really was going to go for the stevens, I just felt more comfortable with the moss. I have shot the savage guns before, and while they were accurate I did not like the way they fit me,The wood stocks seem bulky, and the synthetic seems like cheap plastic. They were fine on a bench but not for a quick point and shoot situation. I also have a moss 500, a bolt action slug gun, and an old bolt action with the poly choke. I took the synthetic stock(junk) that was on my slug gun and slapped that on the poly-choke, took the wood stock from the poly and inlet it a little opened up the forarm a little, cleaned it, slimmed it, fimished it and put it on my slug gun. now my slug gun is sort of a one of a kind, and it looks pretty sweet. It gave new life to the poly gun ( for turkeys) at the same time as it fixed the only issue I had with the slug gun * (hated that synthetic stuck, it smached my face and arm with 3 in slugs). So now I have a little mossberg collection, if the ATR had not shot well I would have given it to my dad for christmas, but i am very happy with it so i think it will stay with me.

Offline PEPAW

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2005, 09:21:15 AM »
I thought they were cheaper. :oops:
Here in Houston, the ATR is on sale for 287 and the Stevens is 259.   Not enough to make a difference, but I have lots of faith in Savage and never tried a Mossberg.  
Thanks for your report.  Looks like you have found your "go-to" rifle.

pepaw

Offline dcnewyork

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
guess they didn't work out so well?
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2005, 05:59:22 AM »
Well I guess the mossbergs did not work out so well for everyone this hunting season. maybe you all traded them for stevens? Well mine worked ..... guess i am happy, sorry for reminding you of a sore subject. better luck with your guns next time.

Offline PEPAW

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2005, 07:49:57 AM »
We are all glad yours did work out!  I bet not too many of the ATR's are actually in the field yet.    Unlike the Savages (Stevens),  the rifle may may take awhile (and lots of happy customers like you) to build the reputation where others will finally buy them.   Just my guess.
I wish Santa would bring me one.   I don't have an '06 at all!

Merry Christmas!

pepaw

Offline aulrich

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 678
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2005, 09:05:56 AM »
Glad to hear it worked out for you, I have a Stevens in 270 and it worked like a charm.  It's funny it seems I get some sort of wierd pleasure out of finding a cheap gun that shoots well (I have a handi in 204 that shoots good as well). I guess it is like finding a good $6 bottle of wine you expect it to be OK but if it's good you can buy 3 of them and still be cheaper than the $20 one that you expect to be good.
The second mouse gets the cheese

Offline MikeyB

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2006, 08:09:52 AM »
After reading the glowing reports here and in the American Rifleman I picked up a ATR in 30-06 at Wally Mart for $244 today. It's going to be my new beater hunting rifle. Boy, she is ugly but the price is right.
Going to mount a Tasco World Class 3x12 on Leupold high base rings.
Hopefully she will be sweet shooting as my Steyr Mannlicher M.

MikeyB

Offline Paul Barnard

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 66
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2006, 06:00:47 PM »
I bought a camo .270 100 ATR for my nephew.  With his first box of Core-locts he had an MOA group.  Hasn't killed a deer with it yet, but he did take out a rat raiding his deer's corn pile.  Bang-Flop shot right through the boiler room.  Back half of the rat could not be located.  He has developed a lot of confidence in the gun and still hopes to get his first deer with it this season.

Offline greenjeans

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 583
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2006, 08:23:48 AM »
Bought the ATR in .270 right after Christmas. Was going to take it out, but had scope mount problems (loose rings). I did make a bad goof when sighting it in. Put the rear sling mount against my shooting rest and broke it first time (the molded in swivel mount). Looks like it is going to be a keeper. Put a Bushnell Elite 3200, 3 x 9 x 50 on it. Love that scope. Took it off one of my other rifles. The ATR's are cheaper here, also. Paid $244. for mine.
Romans 8:38,39

Offline Buckeye

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 526
  • Gender: Male
How did the ATR-100 mossberg handle the hun
« Reply #12 on: January 06, 2006, 10:23:47 AM »
Those Mossberg rifles are fine Firearms , Heres a little history ....
http://www.gunblast.com/Charter2000_FieldKing.htm

Charter sold out to Mossberg.
45/70 Government
Is the only Government
        I trust !