Author Topic: Sen Josh Hawley..  (Read 808 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 691
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sen Josh Hawley..
« Reply #30 on: Today at 05:54:37 AM »
Since these were automatic registrations where people got drivers licenses, I would agree with stopping that.  These were not illegals who set out to register illegally, just a govt. fu.

Online Casull

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4926
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sen Josh Hawley..
« Reply #31 on: Today at 08:08:54 AM »
Since these were automatic registrations where people got drivers licenses, I would agree with stopping that.  These were not illegals who set out to register illegally, just a govt. fu.


You say govt. fu, I say intentional.  And kind of blows away the claim about the "most honest election in history", and your claim of "no" evidence.
Aim small, miss small!!!

Offline Mule 11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6051
Re: Sen Josh Hawley..
« Reply #32 on: Today at 09:32:20 AM »
And yet no one could come up with ANY PROOF in court (legal) or public???  Please, please show me your ?proof? and not ?everyone knows?.  Even Trump proponents had to back down when asked to document proof of fraud.  Remember the Republican lead re-re-count in Arizona, even looking for bamboo fibers, they ?might? have found less than 5 suspicious votes out of millions. 

If they have lists of dead and illegal voters it should very easy to compare that to a register of VOTES CAST.  This would then be PROOF of voter fraud, where can I find this listing?

You won?t find it on cnn or msnbc :)

Offline Mule 11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6051
Re: Sen Josh Hawley..
« Reply #33 on: Today at 09:32:57 AM »
Since these were automatic registrations where people got drivers licenses, I would agree with stopping that.  These were not illegals who set out to register illegally, just a govt. fu.

Yeah, just a mistake. :)

Offline Mule 11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6051
Re: Sen Josh Hawley..
« Reply #34 on: Today at 09:35:45 AM »
And yet no one could come up with ANY PROOF in court (legal) or public???  Please, please show me your ?proof? and not ?everyone knows?.  Even Trump proponents had to back down when asked to document proof of fraud.  Remember the Republican lead re-re-count in Arizona, even looking for bamboo fibers, they ?might? have found less than 5 suspicious votes out of millions. 

If they have lists of dead and illegal voters it should very easy to compare that to a register of VOTES CAST.  This would then be PROOF of voter fraud, where can I find this listing?

You take days to respond then ask for proof? Do your own research and steer away from your normal leftists algorithms

Offline Mule 11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6051
Re: Sen Josh Hawley..
« Reply #35 on: Today at 09:39:25 AM »
Which of those 6600 ACTUALLY VOTED???

Finding my name on a ?list? of billionaires doesn?t make me a billionaire?

I thought we were worried about VOTING fraud NOT outdated voting registration, like folks who died since a previous election.  If what is contested is outdated voter registration, I concede that exists.
Some of them voted and it was proven. again, pull your head out of your Tim waltz and do some research as I will not do YOURS for you.

Offline Mule 11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6051
Re: Sen Josh Hawley..
« Reply #36 on: Today at 09:43:42 AM »
Democrats venomously oppose any voter Id laws. Laws that would only allow registered citizen's to vote. Not dead people, and illegals. There is a profound reason every democrat voted against the bill.     

   With what they cost True Patriotic Americans and unamerican leftists, democrats would never win anything if they did not cheat, lie, steal etc etc

Online ironglowz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1273
Re: Sen Josh Hawley..
« Reply #37 on: Today at 11:49:43 AM »