Author Topic: America's Speed Limits Are Broken — And Here's the Truth No One Wants to Admit  (Read 202 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27235
  • Gender: Male
https://www.newsmax.com/finance/laurenfix/speed-limits-safety/2025/12/29/id/1240055/

Speed limits are the most ignored law in the country. Everyone knows it, everyone does it, and every politician pretends they don’t.

Yet despite universal noncompliance, speed limits keep trending upward.

If that sounds backward, it is—but there’s a reason. And if we want safer, smarter, and freer roads, we need to take a hard look at how these limits are set, why they fail, and what it would take to fix them.

This isn’t about encouraging reckless driving. It’s about honesty.

America’s speed policy is built on outdated assumptions, confusing rules, and political battles that have nothing to do with safety. When you dig into the data, the picture becomes clear: speed limits, at least the way they’re designed today, aren’t working.

And no—an American Autobahn is not around the corner. Here’s why.

The Real Reason Speed Limits Keep Rising

Speed limits aren’t chosen by a politician in a back room or a transportation official with a hunch. They’re set using something called the 85th percentile rule. Engineers measure the speeds drivers are already traveling, and wherever 85% of vehicles fall becomes the basis for the limit.

In theory, this is practical. People tend to choose a speed they find comfortable and safe. In practice, when more than half of Americans already drive faster than the posted signs, every traffic study pushes the numbers higher. It becomes a feedback loop: people speed, engineers raise the limits, people continue speeding, and the cycle repeats.

This doesn’t automatically make roads safer. It makes them inconsistent, and inconsistent road conditions are the biggest danger on the highway—not speed itself.

Speed Variability: The Real Hazard No One Talks About

Politicians and safety advocates tend to focus on raw speed, but they ignore something more important: speed variability. That’s the difference between how fast you’re traveling compared to cars, pedestrians, cyclists, or fixed obstacles around you.

When one driver is doing 55 mph and another is doing 80 mph in the same lane, the danger isn’t the top speed. It’s the speed difference.

High variability creates congestion, abrupt lane changes, tailgating, road rage, and higher crash severity. Uniform speeds are far safer than mixed speeds, and this is where the American system collapses.

We post limits that drivers don’t follow, enforce them sporadically, and allow massive differences in real-world speeds. The result is a road system built on contradiction.

Why ‘Just Raise the Limits’ Won’t Fix It

There’s a popular argument—especially among car enthusiasts—that if we simply raised speed limits to match reality, everything would run smoother. But the data doesn’t support that.

Low speed limits do create distrust, and outdated limits can create unnecessary traffic flow issues. But raising limits without fixing enforcement, road design, and driver training just widens the speed variability problem. There’s another major reason speed limits don’t rise significantly in the U.S.: politics.

The Biggest Opponent to Raising Speed Limits

For decades, insurance companies have been the strongest resistance to higher limits. Higher limits, even if safer in practice, mean higher crash severity, higher claim costs, and higher payouts.

Those industries also donate heavily to lawmakers.

Then there is the “vision zero” movement, an increasingly influential policy push focused on reducing fatalities through lower limits, stricter enforcement, and more speed traps.

Critics argue that it shifts blame from poor infrastructure and distracted driving to a single variable: vehicle speed. The result is a political tug-of-war that has nothing to do with what actually works.

Why the German Autobahn Thrives

Whenever Americans debate speed limits, the Autobahn comes up. It’s the dream for enthusiasts and a mystery to safety advocates.

Here’s why it works. Driver training in Germany is dramatically stricter. New drivers learn lane discipline, high-speed control, and situational awareness, whereas most states in the U.S. barely require parallel parking and a three-point turn.

Left lanes in Germany are for passing only, and drivers follow this rule while enforcement is strict. Roads are engineered for sustained high speeds, whereas many U.S. highways are simply not built for 100+ mph travel. Enforcement is consistent, but for the right violations: tailgating, blocking the left lane, and distracted driving carry serious penalties. Germany doesn’t need universal speed limits on certain sections because drivers, infrastructure, and enforcement philosophy all align. You can’t copy just one piece and expect it to work here.

The Failed 55 MPH National Limit

Many Americans remember the national 55 mph speed limit imposed during the 1970s energy crisis. It was unpopular, widely ignored, and eventually repealed.

Federal data shows the expected safety improvements were marginal and short-lived, but the economic costs and public frustration were enormous. The lesson is clear: arbitrary limits without public trust collapse fast.

Do Speed Limits Actually Work?

Speed limits work only when they match road design, reflect real traffic behavior, are enforced consistently, drivers understand and trust them, and speed variability stays low.

Right now, we’re failing on nearly every one of these points.

Speed limits are broken not because speed is inherently dangerous, but because the system is disconnected from reality.

If America wants safer roads, the solution isn’t simply raising or lowering limits. It’s aligning engineering, enforcement, driver training, and public expectations. Until then, the debate will continue—and so will widespread noncompliance.

Speed limits matter, but America’s biggest issue isn’t speed—it’s inconsistency. Everything from training to enforcement to road design is out of alignment.

An American Autobahn isn’t happening anytime soon, but smarter, more reliable speed policy can happen. It just requires a shift away from politics and toward practical engineering. And that would save more lives than any number printed on a roadside sign.

Video link: https://youtu.be/hGD-W69HE0Q



Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline DDZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6775
  • Gender: Male
 I have to admit. I generally travel 10mph over the speed limit on interstates, and feel perfectly safe doing it. That is on perfectly dry roads.  In Pa they have started putting cameras in work zones. Speed in a work zone and you will get a ticket in the mail. I figure it won't be long before cameras are on highways reducing the need for troopers sitting along roads with a radar gun.
 A lot of people don't slow down enough on slick or wet roads. People still think they can drive fast on wet roads. The more your tires are worn the slower you have to go on wet roads so you don't hydroplane. Many don't realize the importance of tread depth when driving on wet roads. Of course there are the drivers in a 4WD truck, or AWD car that think they can still travel fast on snow covered roads.
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.    Wm. Penn

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8049

      Too close to a Straw-Man argument.

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27235
  • Gender: Male
I'm one of those who I guess slow down the traffic. I'm perfectly happy at 55 mph and set that speed on my cruise control in 65 mph zones all of which are 4 lane roads down here. I don't even know what the speed limit is on interstate highways but still 55 is enough for me. I've not driven on an interstate in several years I don't guess.

I recognize and accept that my reflexes are no longer what they once were and that I'm not the driver I was many years ago. As a result I drive no more than is absolutely necessary and prefer to hold my speed to 55 or less.

I most always set the cruise for the speed limit if 55 or lower or at 55 if higher. I rarely run up on a vehicle going slower to make me hit the brakes.

The state road I live on has a 55 mph speed limit and honestly that's kind of fast for it. There just are no shoulders on it. If your tires leave the pavement you are almost certainly going to wreck. Many places it's a long way to the bottom if you go over. Wrecks are common on it, in fact an every day occurrence.

When we move here there were 13 wrecks in the first six months we were here just in the 350 feet or so between my driveway and the neighbors across the road from us. Two of them came off the road and onto my land. One of them we were hit in the rear while waiting on traffic so we could turn into our own driveway. A dump truck hit a car turning into my neighbor's driveway and nearly killed the folks in the car.

I'm 3 miles from a US highway and in that 3 miles there is at least one wreck daily.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Online ironglowz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 908
 It seems elemental..   let's say that a given highway, has a speed limit is 65, but some folks are doing 80..

   Ok, so they raise the limit to 80 and what happens ? Well, some folks are doing 100, while other obey the new speed limit of 80, so the differential will still be there.

  Generally, I like to obey laws, so with the speed limit on the interstates at 65, I stay in the right lane as much as possible, and watch those who choose to break the law
    run the hammer lane, and whiz on by.

  If I run on cruise, I set it at about 62, so I am not inclined to run up on other drivers in the same lane, and of course those who think I am too slow, are welcome to
   rush on by.

   I recall very well driving on the Autobahn, where there was no speed limit.  Thus, the hammer lane was a series of Mercedes, Lambos, Porsches, Ferraris and Aston Martins chasing one another.

  Surprisingly, there was no great increase in the number of accidents, but when they had one at that speed...it was Merc or Lambo parts and drivers, scattered along about a 1/4 mile route.
   

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8049

    " In a "blind test" where drivers could not view their speed, a study found that drivers averaged
5.6 mph over the speed limit in a 30 mph zone and 3.3 mph over the limit in a 70 mph zone.
Another field study noted a general tendency for drivers to go over their instructed speed by roughly 20% when they could not accurately monitor or perceive their speed. The key findings from the specific blind test:

    In a 30 mph zone, drivers averaged speeds of 35.6 mph (5.6 mph over the limit).
    In a 70 mph zone, drivers averaged speeds of 73.3 mph (3.3 mph over the limit).

The study, conducted by Direct Line Group in 2018, indicated that removing immediate speed information often led to drivers unconsciously increasing their speed beyond the posted limits. Interestingly, when driving around a curve in a 40 mph zone, the "blind test" speed of 40.1 mph was slightly higher than the control speed of 37.6 mph, suggesting drivers were driving faster than they would normally be comfortable with when unaware of their speed. "

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18908
im a speeder and i doubt that suprises anyone. sucks up here above the bridge. just about everything is 55. now back in the 70s they changed that. not for saftey but because of gas shortages. then my truck got 10mpg now it gets 22! add to that back then we were on bias ply tires and drove cars and trucks a sport utility or pickup handle light years better. then we were on drum brakes now its 4 wheel disc's with abs!! my challenger is safer at 90 than my ss chevelle was at 55. its all caving to the insurance companys, you know, the ones that RIP US OFF SEVERELY!! comical that dad could drive his 63 chev pickup and his 64 galaxy 500 65. but on the same roads now with actual shoulders a new corvette has to drive 55!! personally i think it should be the opposite. let us drive 65 knowing we will do 70 and ticket those holding up traffic like motor homes grandma ect that cant drive at least 55. tourist season is crazy up here. grandpas that cant see over the steering wheel of there motor home with traffic backed up for a mile and the idiots even drive 3 or 4 in formation. they may not be in a hurry but time is money for some. especially truckers who cant pass, whats it do? causes everyone to make sketchy passing maneuvers. i wont even go into idiots that tremble if theres some snow on the road which there is up here 4 months out of the year. theres absolutely no reason a modern car cant drive 65 safely today. speed limits should be 55 min 65 max with a 5mp hour fudge on both ends, tickt those driving over 70 or the real dangerous ones that drive slow and back up traffic. if you cant drive the posted speed limit maybe its time to have someone else drive you or stay off of highways altogether, nothing i love more than blasting by them on my harley or challenger and swinging in so close that they can admire the stitching on my seat the horn just a blaring!! sure dont have to worry about being rear ended by one of them. same thing with suburu's. seems everyone with a suburu has so liberal flower power stickers and thinks there helping global warming driving slow ::)
blue lives matter

Online ironglowz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 908
  How often have we had somebody either exceed the speed limit and/or take serious chances to speed and get ahead...only to  catch up with them stopped for some reason, just a few miles ahead.

   Driving 75 instead of 65..at the end of a ten mile trip to the hardware, would save 1.5 minutes, if all goes well. 

   https://www.lifesaferisa.com/blog/fast-and-curious-does-speeding-actually-save-time

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8049

     LOL, I have had that, not very often.
 It is the ones who pass  you then slow down that  annoy me greatly.

     I drive as fast as traffic allows; which means little traffic, I will go as fast as I feel comfortable.  Knowing the road one is on makes going quickly easier but on unknown curvy roads not so much.
     When I drove to Hillsdale , Illinois this summer, on the freeway, I was going 85. plus at times, for long stretches and not really passing very many.

     On empty back roads, I drive as fast as the road, pavement, conditons allow.

     I do not sight see when driving very often, so I want to get from point A to Point B as quickly as possible,
Watching the road and the traffic in front of me is what I ususally see when traveling.
Like Like x 1 View List

Offline Mule 11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801

     LOL, I have had that, not very often.
 It is the ones who pass  you then slow down that  annoy me greatly.

     I drive as fast as traffic allows; which means little traffic, I will go as fast as I feel comfortable.  Knowing the road one is on makes going quickly easier but on unknown curvy roads not so much.
     When I drove to Hillsdale , Illinois this summer, on the freeway, I was going 85. plus at times, for long stretches and not really passing very many.

     On empty back roads, I drive as fast as the road, pavement, conditons allow.

     I do not sight see when driving very often, so I want to get from point A to Point B as quickly as possible,
Watching the road and the traffic in front of me is what I ususally see when traveling.

Yep, and a peek in the rear mirror from time to time. I do believe the U.S. could stand better education for its drivers and until then there will be many more fatalities. The ones who pass and then ride along side the other cars in the other lanes going whatever speed up or down are the best aye?

Online ironglowz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 908

     LOL, I have had that, not very often.
 It is the ones who pass  you then slow down that  annoy me greatly.

     I drive as fast as traffic allows; which means little traffic, I will go as fast as I feel comfortable.  Knowing the road one is on makes going quickly easier but on unknown curvy roads not so much.
     When I drove to Hillsdale , Illinois this summer, on the freeway, I was going 85. plus at times, for long stretches and not really passing very many.

     On empty back roads, I drive as fast as the road, pavement, conditons allow.

     I do not sight see when driving very often, so I want to get from point A to Point B as quickly as possible,
Watching the road and the traffic in front of me is what I ususally see when traveling.
   This morning I had to do a bit of shopping, so i went to a town about 12 miles from me, where there is a super market.  I was driving on a dual lane street that allows 40 mph.

  There was a fellow in the passing lane with a big pickup truck, who was just dawdling along, maybe 32 mph, so driving in the right lane, I started to move up on him to go by.

  As I came nearer, he started to accelerate just a bit.. not as if he just noticed he was too slow, but just a gradual acceleration.

  By the time I reached 40, he was just ahead of me.  All I can figure is that he was a fellow who just couldn't stand for anyone to pass him !  :D ;D

  i guess we have all seen that type before !  Frankly, I didn't care what he did, so long as he didn't interfere with my progress...and he didn't.  :D
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline DDZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6775
  • Gender: Male
Its amazing how many people don't seem to know the passing lane is for passing, and it seems to have gotten worse with the number of people now putzing along in the passing lane.  Something else that has gotten worse is people at red lights looking at their phone after the light turns green. Anymore after the light turns green I give them a few seconds, then I blow the horn. Seems I have had to do that more often lately.
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.    Wm. Penn
Agree Agree x 2 View List

Offline Mule 11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5801
I like the idea of enforcing the left lane for passing only, they pay a heavy enough fine and that would solve a major traffic causing problem.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8049
I like the idea of enforcing the left lane for passing only, they pay a heavy enough fine and that would solve a major traffic causing problem.
There is already a law in Minn. for people must stay out of the left lane if they are not moving at traffic speed.
That includes only going at the same speed as the car next to it; if you are not passing that car you will get a ticket.

They gave a number of tickets when it was first passed, but like the - no talking on the telephone law - about the same time, more history than fact now.
Like Like x 1 View List

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18908
MI too but its never enforced
I like the idea of enforcing the left lane for passing only, they pay a heavy enough fine and that would solve a major traffic causing problem.
There is already a law in Minn. for people must stay out of the left lane if they are not moving at traffic speed.
That includes only going at the same speed as the car next to it; if you are not passing that car you will get a ticket.

They gave a number of tickets when it was first passed, but like the - no talking on the telephone law - about the same time, more history than fact now.
blue lives matter

Online ironglowz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 908
  We have the left for passing lane only, here also, but it appears they rarely enforce it..unless it is a truck. ..But of course a competent truck driver rarely abuses the rul  I often drive a road where it is the old style 2 lane, that is one lane each way.

  However, at the hills the road is broadened to 2 lanes when climbing. A great irritation there is when a driver is going at or below the speed, and won't move over to the climbing lane ! Especially bothersome when there is a slow poke in both lanes..

   Those climbing lanes are a money maker for the state too.  Since the  right lane pinches off at the top, sometimes drivers beside each other will accelerate to win the rush to the pinch point.  A trooper waiting semi-concealed at the top, can rake in radar tickets..

Agree Agree x 1 View List