New discoveries are being announced, almost weekly.

[ironglowz]

  Found; possible site of the home of Prophet Elisha...

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccYv4_6rfXI                                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8LbYaY3EsA

[ironglowz]

   I'm clearly surprised..  It would seem that anyone clicking into the "religious discussion" would be interested in recent related discoveries..

  ...But there were 710 who did read the report..without even a single comment.

  Perhaps my interest in history, especially Biblical history, leaves me out here by myself !  Is there actually that little interest in the subject?

[Dee]

   I'm clearly surprised..  It would seem that anyone clicking into the "religious discussion" would be interested in recent related discoveries..

  ...But there were 710 who did read the report..without even a single comment.

  Perhaps my interest in history, especially Biblical history, leaves me out here by myself !  Is there actually that little interest in the subject?

Recent related discoveries? A discovery of what? Related to what? An old building.
Maybe its the topics you pick, or the way you present them. Most all of your biblical history is based on pure speculation/fantasy.
Take this topic for instance.
You and the producer of the video have ZERO evidence that the prophet Elisha ever set foot in the yard, much less lived in the ruins of what once was a building?
Is there any reference in the Bible to Elisha even having a house? Answer: Nope!

I for one am, and always have been, very interested in history, but factual, prove-able history, not fantasizing, which is what this topic actually is.This particular topic your representing as biblical history is simple archeology with no obvious connection to the Bible.
Maybe that's why no one shows any interest. Puttin it in the religious forums doesn't give it religious historical credence.

[ironglowz]

   I'm clearly surprised..  It would seem that anyone clicking into the "religious discussion" would be interested in recent related discoveries..

  ...But there were 710 who did read the report..without even a single comment.

  Perhaps my interest in history, especially Biblical history, leaves me out here by myself !  Is there actually that little interest in the subject?

Recent related discoveries? A discovery of what? Related to what? An old building.
Maybe its the topics you pick, or the way you present them. Most all of your biblical history is based on pure speculation/fantasy.
Take this topic for instance.
You and the producer of the video have ZERO evidence that the prophet Elisha ever set foot in the yard, much less lived in the ruins of what once was a building?
Is there any reference in the Bible to Elisha even having a house? Answer: Nope!

I for one am, and always have been, very interested in history, but factual, prove-able history, not fantasizing, which is what this topic actually is.This particular topic your representing as biblical history is simple archeology with no obvious connection to the Bible.
Maybe that's why no one shows any interest. Puttin it in the religious forums doesn't give it religious historical credence.

   There you go again, anything to pick an argument !

  Here is my lead line..  "  Found; POSSIBLE site of the home of Prophet Elisha...  So there is no need to get your panties wadded up !

   It is extremely rare to find PROOF in many things, especially in archaeology.  Best we can do is present evidence..and the evidence is quite strong with this site,
   considering time frame, location and items found.

  Did you truly view both videos ?  So far as evidence is concerned, it is quite strong.

  Since you enjoy history...think; can you PROVE that Socrates, Attila the Hun, Napoleon Bonaparte or even George Washington existed or did the things said of them ?

   Think now...of each we have evidence..strong evidence, books, portraits, quotes and local publications. ..But to PROVE they ever existed ?  In order to PROVE same you would need to produce the body..and perhaps more.

  Many a killer has walked because the prosecution could not produce Habeas Corpus..  ..But some few killers have been convicted, because the EVIDENCE was so very strong, even without a corpse .

   That is the grade of evidence we encounter here...yet I still described it as POSSIBLE !

  So, just "cool those jets' and look atb the evidence..

[Dee]

My panties are never wadded up. There isn't  anything here worth getting worked up over. Your style is like trying to herd cats. Your all over the place. But you asked a question as to why no one showed any interest. I gave you my opinion. If you hadn't asked for an opinion, I'd have ignored the thread like I'd been doing, and like everyone else has. You just didn't get what you wanted. Now your tryin to rationalize "yourself", that out of 711 people, your the only one that has any intellect. On that my opinion is: you should've been a beagle.
But like you said, 710 folks read it, and nobody was interested. That "historical fact" hasnt enlightened you to anything either.

With that said, I don't have anything else to add.