New assault Rifle ban bill intrduced

[nw_hunter]

Stupid Libertards will never learn or give up. We know in reality, they will never stop trying to disarm us period.

https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/second-amendment-gun-rights-assault-rifles/2025/05/02/id/1209259/?ns_mail_uid=5b8c9cde-91ac-4455-8151-da9662f38cc6&ns_mail_job=DM787542_05062025&s=acs&dkt_nbr=010502q7jhdn

[moamonkey]

Same lame brains with the same ole spiel, trying to appear relevant…to somebody.

[darkgael]

The people who are trying to take away my firearms have very little, if any, understanding of why I own firearms in the first place…..and I own a whole bunch of them.
Those people will tell me that I do not “need” firearms. How arrogant is that? What do they know about what I need, about what makes me happy? That right to happiness be it from owning fast cars or firearms is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. Need has nothing to do with it.

[Dee]

I think need has everything to do with it. The 2nd amendment is about protecting ourselves from those people who want to tell us what we can have.

[Lloyd Smale]

amen

The people who are trying to take away my firearms have very little, if any, understanding of why I own firearms in the first place…..and I own a whole bunch of them.
Those people will tell me that I do not “need” firearms. How arrogant is that? What do they know about what I need, about what makes me happy? That right to happiness be it from owning fast cars or firearms is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. Need has nothing to do with it.

[DDZ]

The problem doesn't lie with those in office that want to tell citizens which firearms they can own. The problem lies with voters that vote for people that want to tell citizens which firearms they can use.

[Dee]

The problem doesn't lie with those in office that want to tell citizens which firearms they can own. The problem lies with voters that vote for people that want to tell citizens which firearms they can use.

Well, I'm gonna disagree, and agree. The people in office that want to tell folks which guns they can and can't own, are wrong, and should honor the constitution they swore to protect.
AND, the dumbasses that vote for these office holders, shouldn't be allowed to vote.

[Lloyd Smale]

yup we bitch at our polititions but in a democracy the people decide who to put there. bottom line is probably 45 percent of the voters either are for gun control or at the least dont care. add that to out of the other 55 percent probably 20 percent dont care one way or the other which puts us in a bad way. if the election would have gone to harris there would have been a ton of new regulations banning guns already. we walk a very weak tight rope. single digit percentages on election day are all thats reenforcing that tightrope. your liberal neighbor (and we ALL have them) is the real blame in this. look how many voted crazy aoc in. heck look at my own stae and how easily whitmer was elected. just about every state has a liberal or 2 in the senate and house. they didnt get hired they got elected by your neighbors!!

The problem doesn't lie with those in office that want to tell citizens which firearms they can own. The problem lies with voters that vote for people that want to tell citizens which firearms they can use.

[Land_Owner]

On election day, many that vote have not even read the resolutions or the positions on which the candidates for whom they vote are standing.Blue hairs vote blue on election day.

"Position thinking" is pre-planning for the Conservative. Blue hair, typically hair on fire, is the closed eye and mind of the Democrat's.

I sure would like to purchase some of those "assault rifles"! I want at least one.  Perhaps a nice select fire 308...though my Browning 338 BAR would appreciate a "friend". Know what I mean? Get your hands on one and never let go.