From Dee;
" Well, it has also been noted that in the past, your "history research" has been a bit faulty with such your research concerning Robert E Lee, and Stonewall Jackson being opposite of your findings."
Nope! just a case of your history vs my history, and I furnished references..
Ya know ironglow? For an old fart, your yankee ego knows no bounds. You've done everything you could to expand a simple thread about one priest in one church into a movement, bringing popes, Hispanics, other countries, and on and on.
Just like your "history buff" nonsense of Robert E Lee, and Stonewall Jackson, never owning slaves. Historical documents say otherwise.
You seem to have no mental capacity to "learn from others", and believe yourself to be an educator on all topics.
By God ironglow said they never owned slaves and that's that! Word with the bark on it about Southern History straight from upper New York State.!

Your a "novice historian" on your best day, and refuse "historical facts" in lue of your own "perceptions".
I have an 84 year old uncle just like you. His decades old self history of always being right according to His "perceptions" have been dubbed by most who know him as "isms".
In other words, like "your online Confederate history research" while incorrect according to historical factual history, is nothing more than "ironglow-isms".
This thread I started on this one priest ,at this one church, on this one topic and this one event at that one church, has evolved through YOU into a series of "ironglow-isms", covering other churches, and even posters. Efforts to lead you back to the topic, and away from conflict, were met by more of your "ironglow-isms"