Still No Sandy Hook Eye Witness

[lgm270]

There was one purported survivor named Natalie Hammond who was an adult teacher at Sandy Hook, who was reported to have been shot in the hand, foot and leg.  Some news stories referred to her, but she has never been interviewed on any  TV.

On January 16, 2013,  the NEwtown School Superintendent testified in Congress and read from a lengthy, written script.   She is not an eye witness and has no direct  knowledge of anything that happened.

Where is the one eye witness who actually "saw" the shooter?  Where are photos of the actual guns used?   


http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/01/16/sandy-hook-superintendent-shares-the-chilling-details/

[DDZ]

The video brings up a lot of discrepancies in the Sandy Hook reporting. Its a 30 minute video. If nothing else check out Robbie Parker whos daughter has just been shot at 8:34, and the Mcdonald family at 15:00, who's child was reported to be also shot.

I figure tax payers money can probably buy a lot of lying. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKDT7XwgMMo

[SharonAnne]

BINGO!

[Mike in Virginia]

Who among us are owed correct media coverage?  If we don't get the specific answers, if we can't explain the discrepancies, we automatically fall backwards into ignorance fed by ignorance.  We don't need the details.  We are so quick to deny truths because we are obsessed with our gun rights.  I don't deny that Obama or any politician will lie to us, but Sandy Hook is too big of a lie to be possible.  Untold numbers of people would have come forward by now if it didn't happen.  You are going on what you want to be true.  Such a weakness does not help us, and it is so very disrespectful.  Someone with guns killed those kids, which is not a step forward for gun rights, but the reality of it is what it is.  There's nothing in the event to help us, but so very much at stake if we deny it simply because we don't want the liberals to say again that guns kill people. 
When you ask yourself where is the proof, also ask yourself why the hell do you think you are deserving of the proof.  You are not.  No one here is owed any kind of explanation.  Your children are not dead. 

[KIMBER45]

Who among us are owed correct media coverage?  If we don't get the specific answers, if we can't explain the discrepancies, we automatically fall backwards into ignorance fed by ignorance.  We don't need the details.  We are so quick to deny truths because we are obsessed with our gun rights.  I don't deny that Obama or any politician will lie to us, but Sandy Hook is too big of a lie to be possible.  Untold numbers of people would have come forward by now if it didn't happen.  You are going on what you want to be true.  Such a weakness does not help us, and it is so very disrespectful.  Someone with guns killed those kids, which is not a step forward for gun rights, but the reality of it is what it is.  There's nothing in the event to help us, but so very much at stake if we deny it simply because we don't want the liberals to say again that guns kill people. 
When you ask yourself where is the proof, also ask yourself why the hell do you think you are deserving of the proof.  You are not.  No one here is owed any kind of explanation.  Your children are not dead.

EXCELLENT -  It's called empathy. Some of you should ask the parents of the dead children and mothers if it was all a lie. How totally sickening to even think such a thing. Pray the tragedy never happens to your family. And ask yourself how you would feel is some insensitive jerk said it was all a lie. How shameful to disrespect the dead like that.

[lgm270]

Who among us are owed correct media coverage?  If we don't get the specific answers, if we can't explain the discrepancies, we automatically fall backwards into ignorance fed by ignorance.  We don't need the details.  We are so quick to deny truths because we are obsessed with our gun rights.  I don't deny that Obama or any politician will lie to us, but Sandy Hook is too big of a lie to be possible.  Untold numbers of people would have come forward by now if it didn't happen.  You are going on what you want to be true.  Such a weakness does not help us, and it is so very disrespectful.  Someone with guns killed those kids, which is not a step forward for gun rights, but the reality of it is what it is.  There's nothing in the event to help us, but so very much at stake if we deny it simply because we don't want the liberals to say again that guns kill people. 
When you ask yourself where is the proof, also ask yourself why the hell do you think you are deserving of the proof.  You are not.  No one here is owed any kind of explanation.  Your children are not dead.

EXCELLENT -  It's called empathy. Some of you should ask the parents of the dead children and mothers if it was all a lie. How totally sickening to even think such a thing. Pray the tragedy never happens to your family. And ask yourself how you would feel is some insensitive jerk said it was all a lie. How shameful to disrespect the dead like that.

The USA is based on the principle that governments derive their powers from the consent of the governed and that means we're owed an explanation, especially when they're using some bogus, contrived event to violate rights and disarm us.

Where are photos of the guns used?

Where are statements from the one purported surviving  eye witness who has never been interviewed?   

Why are the only people talking about this event people who either were not there or were in some other part of the  school and only heard gunfire and never saw anything?

This hoax is being used to disarm us and we have a right to question it just like anything else. 

You and Hillary Clinton may not think the truth  makes any "difference" but the rest of us do think the truth is important enough to ask questions about it.   
   

[cjclemens]

I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist, but there's enough discrepancies in this to raise a lot of questions. Maybe it's not a total hoax, but I wouldn't be surprised if things didnt happen a little differently than we've been led to believe. After all, Fast and Furious fell apart before they could use it as anti gun propaganda. Why not toss an AR in Lanza's lap and use it as fuel for a assault weapons ban? The Allies created an entire phony army to fool the Germans. I know it was a different situation, but bigger hoaxes have been pulled off with the help of the media.

[DDZ]

There will always be people with blinders on, and those that are producing lies, would not want it any other way. Just listen, get in line, and follow.
Its one of the reasons we have communists in our government.   

[ironglow]

No witnesses?  Almost impossible to believe with an event this large...

[KIMBER45]

No witnesses?  Almost impossible to believe with an event this large...

Perhaps that's because they were killed?

[KIMBER45]

There will always be people with blinders on, and those that are producing lies, would not want it any other way. Just listen, get in line, and follow.
Its one of the reasons we have communists in our government.

McCarthyism lives -