I don't think so.  The liability would be too great.  
My wife shoots a Marlin .44 Mag Carbine.  Several years ago she loaded up some shells using the LYMAN manual.  These loads were specifically for the .44 Carbine, and had a warning that they were too potent for the Pistol.  She stored them in a Ziplock that was well marked.  They shot well in her carbine, and she was happy that they seemed to have a bit more authority than the loads I had always loaded for her.  Over the years, and a move to DC then back to Alaska.  While in DC we made a few trips to Tennessee to hunt Deer, and hauled them in a bag to and from.  Eventually the markings and warnings wore off.  
A couple of years after returning to Alaska I was going to the range.  I grabbed my Ruger Super Blackhawk.  There was this bag of .44 shells in the vault, so I picked them up, forgetting about how hot they were loaded.  I went to the range, and the recoil of the first shot told me something was wrong.  I looked at the gun and noticed the top strap of the frame was bent upwards.  The cylinder would not turn, and I could see a crack along the sides of that chamber.  Could not remove the cylinder to unload the gun.  I realized I had been lucky I had not been hurt.