Hmmm. The state can pay money to hire sharpshooters to kill a few wolves - just to remain on the good side of political correctness. Or the state can take in money from thousands of hunters willing to submit $3 application fees for years just to get a kill tag.
I wonder which the state will choose?
Here's an animal, a predator, that can weigh upwards of 120 pounds and can bring down an elk. You get a year when there is an increase in the numbers of wolves and a drop in thier food supply and suddenly we are on the menu. Delisting the wolf is good in so many ways.
Are you suggesting that the wolf ought to be extirpated base on these concerns? I would disagree. If you compare the wolf to the black bear you'll see that these fears are unrealistic. The bear can grow well beyond 600#s and we have PLENTY of documentation of black bears indeed eating people AND we have way more of them in the state. Yet no one is calling for the elimination of black bears.
I say start issuing wolf tags. In a few short years there will be a "Wisconsin Wolf Hunters Association". I suspect the problems with dogs getting attacked will end pretty quickly once the wolves learn that is a good way to get shot.
Besides, I think a wolf pelt would make an awesome ice-fishing hat.