The above and - my old eyes can see the bullet holes in the target without messing with a spotting scope.
Got a Laugh out of this reply.
There are a few things that attracted me to the H&R in 45-70. First, I have always been interested in the 45-70 for a number of reasons (history and the big bore mainly). Second, I really have never had an interest in lever actions, they just don't appeal to me. Third I wanted something that could handle loads from mild to wild, ruling out trapdoor, rolling blocks etc. Fourth I have a very limited budget, ruling out Ruger #1's and Siamese Mausers.
This pretty much left the H&R as the only option in my price range. I haven't shot it much, only offhand with open sights, but was happy to find it on target at 50yds without adjusting the factory sights (minute of paper coffee cup at 50yds). The only load I have tried so far is the factory loaded Hornady Leverevolution, I would compare the recoil to a 3-1/2" 12ga shooting light, fast steel loads.
There are lots of options to reduce the recoil beyond this point. Lighter loads, upgraded recoil pad, mercury recoil reducer in the buttstock or filling the buttstock with lead shot. Adding a scope (which adds weight as well) can also soften felt recoil.
For my purposes, I like the fact that the rifle is light and compact, so I want to add as little weight as possible. I am planning on upgrading the recoil pad (probably a limbsaver) and I am adding a scope, but with quick detach rings, so I can use the open sights if I choose too.
Jim