I appreciate the detailed and varied replies.
It seems that our 22 Hornet obviates the need for the 22WMR. Who said "need" has anything to do with gun purchases?
If that is the case, and I was going to spend a total of $270 at least on one of each cheap alternatives, I may as well get the Henry 22 for about $250, as I had 4 years experience with it, shooting ground squirrels every day spring to fall, for one hour, and it never let me down.
It fed every 22CB, 22S and 22 LR I tried, and with a 2x7 scope was really accurate to 75yds on those tiny little 13 line ground squirrels. I practiced on soda cans at 75 yards, as they are the same size as the adult squirrel. It holds 26 22CB or 22S in the tube magazine and can be fired fast.
Gave the Henry to a friend of mine when I moved from rural Michigan to metro MO. He got cancer and sold off everything he could to pay medical bills - while I thought it was a pity, I figured in the grand scheme of things he needed money for medical treatment more than I needed a rifle.
The problem is, I have handled a CZ 22LR, that was a big mistake. However, the price tag of $470 will keep me away from one of those. $200 can buy an awful lot of 22 ammo.
Then again, $120 buys an awful lot of 22 ammo too, if I bought a cheap Savage or H&R Sportster compared to the Henry...hmm, see how this process gets all jumbled up and changes in my mind the more I think about it...I will have to give the Henry idea more thought...
I do agree with single shot aiding in the development of my boys abilities, they are very good with the single-shot Hornet and were from the outset, and they do not waste ammo, they are very aware of the ammo resource they have for each range outing.
If you have not posted and have more ideas or criticisms of my leanings here, please, keep it going. It is always easier to change my mind or firm up my decision before I have committed a cent to the project!