Author Topic: Liberals...calling all liberals.. (Read 1295 times)

ironglow · « **on:** August 09, 2009, 12:06:43 PM »

Please do your best job of defending this &%$#@^%&* from the Obamanation...View the video provided by CNN..you know one of those that are cozy with liberals..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1n7xgD1Keg (+ more vids worth watching there)

If you do try to defend these Democrat actions...be ready to defend your sanity...

billy_56081 · « **Reply #1 on:** August 09, 2009, 12:13:44 PM »

BHO's minions are seeing through his veil of lies, he needs more voters. So he will give himself more voters. It's just that simple

kynardsj · « **Reply #2 on:** August 09, 2009, 12:27:00 PM »

Speaking of BHO, Hannity is supposed to be on Fox tonight at 8:00 CST and tell of BHO's ties to some of the radicals. Not trying to hijack this post but looked like a place to mention it.

hillbill · « **Reply #3 on:** August 09, 2009, 02:35:18 PM »

yur not gonna find any liberals on here, give it up. go to the huffington post

billy_56081 · « **Reply #4 on:** August 09, 2009, 02:37:28 PM »

Quote from: hillbill on August 09, 2009, 02:35:18 PM

yur not gonna find any liberals on here, give it up. go to the huffington post

Oh there are more than you think!

ironglow · « **Reply #5 on:** August 09, 2009, 03:07:58 PM »

Trouble is as I said at the outset..if any liberals try to defend the idoicy shown in that video, I have a feeling they will have to defend their sanity on this forum.

nomosendero · « **Reply #6 on:** August 09, 2009, 04:54:25 PM »

Quote from: hillbill on August 09, 2009, 02:35:18 PM

yur not gonna find any liberals on here, give it up. go to the huffington post

We have a few dandies right here.

Oldshooter · « **Reply #7 on:** August 09, 2009, 05:02:29 PM »

yep they are lurking under something around here. I'm bettin they aint gonna show colors here for this tho!

mauser98us · « **Reply #8 on:** August 09, 2009, 05:14:01 PM »

Bottom line is Demos see illegals as a big voting bloc,which equals more power and no chance of losing elections. It's as simple as that.

powderman · « **Reply #9 on:** August 09, 2009, 05:27:28 PM »

Another post lost I see. I wish you guys would say what a link is cause this ol dialup is the pits. I don't even try most links anymore. Something about illegals I reckon from a previous post. POWDERMAN.

crustaceous · « **Reply #10 on:** August 09, 2009, 05:38:08 PM »

That video is over two years old and the "issues" resolved. I doubt any liberals will respond as they're most likely paying attention to current events.
Must be a slow night when the ol' rable rouser feels the need to dredge up ancient history.

beerbelly · « **Reply #11 on:** August 10, 2009, 12:53:44 AM »

Well he did find one to stick his head up!!
Beerbelly

alsaqr · « **Reply #12 on:** August 10, 2009, 01:24:00 AM »

Quote

Bottom line is Demos see illegals as a big voting bloc,which equals more power and no chance of losing elections. It's as simple as that.

True that.

Illegal aliens are a true bi-baptisan thing. The Democrat party wants them to register and vote. The fat cat contributors to the Republican party want them for cheap labor. It is a lose-lose situation for the rest of us. Look at the Juan Kennedy-Juan McCain amnesty for illegal aliens bill that failed last year thanks to dedicated Republican senators and their constituents.

After proposing this piece of pukey legislation, Juan McAmnesty expected us to make him POTUS-right.

crustaceous · « **Reply #13 on:** August 10, 2009, 05:17:01 AM »

Quote from: beerbelly on August 10, 2009, 12:53:44 AM

Well he did find one to stick his head up!!
Beerbelly

And what did he stick his head up?

ironglow · « **Reply #14 on:** August 11, 2009, 01:07:23 AM »

Crusty & Beerbelly;
So you fell for it ! You're not off the hook yet..that was the bill the Democrats pushed back in 2006 but the sensible senators voted down.
But can anyone here believe they would try to ram throught a similar , but even worse bill this year ?

So, my omniscient liberal friends..try explaining why they would try the same thing twice..other than they think they have all the guns now....

Here's this year's effort:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjeJnjUGnIA&feature=related

billy_56081 · « **Reply #15 on:** August 11, 2009, 01:18:13 AM »

I think we have had a few liberal heads pop up!

crustaceous · « **Reply #16 on:** August 11, 2009, 03:58:44 AM »

Quote from: ironglow on August 11, 2009, 01:07:23 AM

Here's this year's effort:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjeJnjUGnIA&feature=related

Hardly. That's another 2+ year old video.

ironglow · « **Reply #17 on:** August 11, 2009, 04:30:13 AM »

So are you willing to refer to anyone who would sponsor or vote for such legislation as a nutcase ? Socialists don't give up in their aims, they will push and push for this kind of legislation until doomsday if they must, in order to get their Socialist/Marxist aims through.
Do we not realize by their rhetoric, that the radical left (who rules the Dems, and chums with some Reps), hates the United States and would like to see the US meld into a UN-run "one-world-govt".

Keep in mind just how evil that bill outlined by Lou Dobbs was. It was so bad, even CNN's Lou Dobbs couldn't stomach it. Still there were politicians who VOTED FOR that freedom-robbing movement. Her is the official record of those who voted for it.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00235

Please note that crooked as it was, Obama, Biden, Clinton & Schumer all voted for it !

Guys; How did your elected reps do ?

Hillbill;
"you're not going to find any liberals here"... Look close enough and one can sometimes find fleas on the best groomed dog !...LOL

ironglow · « **Reply #18 on:** August 11, 2009, 05:00:55 AM »

So liberals; can you defend the votes of those radical leftists...Obama, Biden & Clinton ?

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #19 on:** August 11, 2009, 05:13:31 AM »

they don't defend each other , there game plan is to repete lies enough they get each other to believe them !

ironglow · « **Reply #20 on:** August 11, 2009, 01:59:47 PM »

No TM, votes are not always along party lines..note the recent vote to approve Sotomayor as an associate @ SCOTUS. Of course, she said we should all recognize that no white man could be nearly as smart as she is..and some Reps fell for it !
If you will note, I preferred to address primarily by the labels, "liberal" or "conservative"..since that is a more accurate delineiation than the old (and I think, obsolete) party labels...Blue dogs & Rinos have blurred the distinctions.
Right now the radical left tail wags the Dems body and the country-club set wags the Reps., so neither one is worth their cost to the country.

Again, note regardless of "party"..the libs wanted the insane amnesty bill and they pushed for it..they are pushing a re-wrapped version right now....in 2009.

Obama, Biden, Clinton, Schumer, Durbin and their ilk VOTED FOR the insanity last time around.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #21 on:** August 11, 2009, 02:04:07 PM »

IG you have sure ruffled some libs feathers. I don't think liberal and liar are to far apart.

crustaceous · « **Reply #22 on:** August 11, 2009, 03:20:38 PM »

Not sure who the liars are but none of the things Lou was complaining about were included in the bill as voted on.

splicer · « **Reply #23 on:** August 11, 2009, 03:58:28 PM »

I will take Lou's word over any of the the liberal politicians we have nowdays.Obama lies everyday.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #24 on:** August 12, 2009, 04:09:07 AM »

Their lips move when they tell a lie , easy to know !

ironglow · « **Reply #25 on:** August 12, 2009, 12:10:54 PM »

Quote from: crustaceous on August 11, 2009, 03:20:38 PM

Not sure who the liars are but none of the things Lou was complaining about were included in the bill as voted on.

Hey Crusty;
Where did you get a copy of that 1,000+ page bill....and when did you read it ?

crustaceous · « **Reply #26 on:** August 12, 2009, 01:34:10 PM »

I got it from you, my friend. Don't tell me you don't check the links you post?
Go to your last link and click on Measure Number: S.1639. and then "text of legislation". Shazam, it's all there!
Granted I only glossed over it but, I couldn't find anything close to Lou's two year old complaints.

ironglow · « **Reply #27 on:** August 12, 2009, 03:29:23 PM »

We all know by now that one has to read all the "fine print" and parse it from a liberal context to see it as the Socialist/Marxist crowd does.
People are bringing up at town hall meetings,.. many, many instances where "double-speak" and double entendre are employed by the radical left. George Orwell described it quite well when he labeled it "newspeak"..
It truly is hard to believe that someone who claims to be a hunter/shooter can fall for the gun-grabber's lines.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #28 on:** August 12, 2009, 03:33:51 PM »

Well IG you have done well, calling all liberals has gotten a bunch to respond.

ironglow · « **Reply #29 on:** August 12, 2009, 03:47:10 PM »

  Crusty;
   You said NONE of those ugly provisions were were left in trhe final bill..How do you know ? Below is a portion of the text of S1639;
  reread it and see what you make of it...

"....Establishes a temporary Y-visa program for non-seasonal (Y-1) and seasonal workers (Y-2) (which replaces the H-2B category). Provides for: (1) a two-year Y-1 admission with two additional two-year extensions (must be outside the United States for 12 months after working in the United States for two years), and a 10-month Y-2 admission; (2) issuance of Y-3 nonimmigrant visas for accompanying or following spouse and children; (3) three-year Y-1 commuter workers; (4) establishment in the Treasury of a State Impact Assistance Account and a state impact assistance grant program; (5) U.S. worker protection; (6) employer requirements; (7) specified annual admissions caps; and (

bilateral agreements with countries of Y-visa nonimmigrants as a condition of making such visas available."....

   Now that you have read just these few lines again... are you completely familiar with the Y-1, Y-2 and Y-3 programs.
  Then, line
   (4) establishment in the treasury of a State Impact Assistance Account and a state impact assistance grant program..

  Do you know just what old Teddy meant by that double talk ? It could be construed in different ways.. Would the State assistance grants be given to the states or to the illegals living in those states ? We know from experience that liberals have a slick way of saying one thing, which would be clear to honest people..except that Mr Liberal is parsing the words...

Obviously, line (eight) through "bi-lateral agreements" (read sucking up for money)makes visas available to "nonimmigrants" (read illegals). ...A great example of Orwellian "newspeak".

   Remember; "It depends on what IS..IS.."

Or.."I did not have sex with that woman !"

I think we all know whether he had sex with that woman

...and most of us know what IS...IS...