Back to the range on Sunday. Re-tried the 460 hornadies - no keyholing, but still very lousy groups.
Then I tried the 444 power belts with 90 and 100 grains of pyrodex. 25 yard groups were unexceptable at 4 to 5 inches.
Off to the Scheels for some 348 grain powerbelts. Once again, unexceptable groups with 90 and 100 grains of pyrodex.
On a whim, reached into my goodies box a retrieved the Goex FF that I shoot in my TC 54 New Englander. 100 grains of FF with the 348 produced clover leafs at 25 yards. Moved the target to 75 yards. Acceptable 2.5 inch groups. Grabbed the 444 power belts, same charge/same target, and proceded to land the next 4 shots into the same 2.5 inch group. Go Figure???
Removed the scope, sighted in with the open sites and now Dad can hit a large soup can at 75 yards with the TC open sites.
Taking the Encore, Dad, and the 444's to Colorado next week. I'll shoot my New Englander and 450 grain PR Conical.
Why such heavy bullets? I prefer the heavier weights because they usually leave two holes that make tracking without snow on the ground much easier. I realize that shot placement is essential and I have rarely had a double lunged elk go more than 75 to 100 yards. But, once upon a time, years ago, with a lighter bullet, I hit a cow to far back (Based upon the blood spot on her side, base of lungs and liver) I lost her, when I lost the blood trail. Switched to a heavier conical and reasonable charge and have had pass through ever since (5-elk).
Thanks for all comments. I do intend to try some 370 range conicals in the encore for deer hunting.
SRM...