« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: hard choice  (Read 1753 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline billy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 407
Re: hard choice
« Reply #30 on: October 25, 2008, 01:59:07 PM »
Hi Victorcharlie,almost all my hunting is done in Lincoln County and yes the fit and finish is very good on these rifles.
Logged
I enjoy collecting guns, swaping and staying up on all the newest models. I deer, quail, squirrel and rabbit hunt.

Offline charles p

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2374
  • Gender: Male
Re: hard choice
« Reply #31 on: October 25, 2008, 02:37:53 PM »
Greybeard gave you good advice.  A Mod 7 Rem is my choice.  Maybe 7mm-08 instead of 270.  I have both in Rems.  Don't overlook the 280 either.
Logged

Offline kyelkhunter3006

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1576
  • Gender: Male
Re: hard choice
« Reply #32 on: October 26, 2008, 02:53:13 PM »
Quote from: Graybeard on October 17, 2008, 11:44:25 AM
I continue to be amazed at the number of folks who seem to think controlled round feed is so important

You know, I have to totally agree with this.....  If you think about it, the guns that are used to hunt the most dangerous prey (our military guns), I don't think that a single one of them is controlled round feed at all.  The Army and Marine Corp. sniper rifles aren't, none of the semi or fully automatic guns are....  If it really made that big of a difference in reliability, you'd think that the designers of the military weapons would incorporate it.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »