There is no answer to this question that makes sense to everyone. The 45-70 is obviously very popular among Handi owners. I still can not believe that if they only had one, it would be the 45-70. For every reason they give to have one, you can counter with another cartridge. What is wrong with the 38-55? It is an old cartridge, can shoot black powder, can will go off every time, can be accurate, load it down with cast bullets, put down any thing in North America and shoot cheaper than a 45-70, they got the bore size issues worked out in later models. The same could be said of the 30-30 as the 38-55 with the exception of really big game. I seriously doubt IF anyone of these guys would go to Africa; and if they did they would not take the 45-70 in a Handi as their only weapon. So why state that it will take anything on earth when they never will have an opportunity to do so. I will more than likely never go to Africa on a hunting trip and if I did, I would be taking a strong bolt action in something other than a 45-70. I can not see myself only having a 45-70 in a Handi, I just have no need for it. It is not legal for deer hunting in our state, it is not the best cartridge for punching paper, it is not the cheapest to shoot, it has a relative short range, unless you aim at the moon. I can go on and on about why the 45-70 does not make any sense as the only Handi you would have, yet there are people that swear that is exactly what they would have as an only cartridge (read previous postings). We do not all think alike and do not have to explain our thoughts, what makes perfect sense to one does not to another. No, I do not get it either, but it does not matter if I get it or not, it is their choice, not mine.