Lloyd;
the new Silverado as you described, delivers 14/19 according to the EPA..considering your cautious driving, 20 mpg is not out of the question. I do
however, take issue with your saying that you can't find a small truck that does that well. Don't know where you're looking, but all my Ranger 4 cyl manuals
have beaten that figure quite easily OTR. I regularly get 28 mpg and yes, I do drive for economy..I BUY for economy. My son has an old "beater" '97 Ranger
that gets a bit better mileage than mine.
If anyone thinlks they can get the same mileage pushing a 5.3L truck weighing 5,000 pounds or more as they can with a 2.3L pushing 3,000 lbs..they must
be kidding themselves ! Apparently much of the public sees it as I do, since the compacts are selling fairly well, while GM is paying folks up to $7,000 to buy
their big models !
Curiously; the larger trucks that I have driven rarely live up to their EPA claims..but I am not a fan of auto-trans and I may not be getting max miles from them.
30/06 man;
Don't know where you get the $20,000 for a Ranger, mine cost about $14,000 while the Silverado Lloyd spoke of was $28,000+, of course the $7,000
incentive is going to drop that some..
You guys could rightfully claim that the EPA OTR rating..Silverado 19mpg, Ranger 26mpg is not significant enough to justify the smaller truck in your mind, but
let's not try to distort the real facts.