Author Topic: 17HMR shooters  (Read 2395 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline monkey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6
17HMR shooters
« on: March 24, 2008, 12:01:00 PM »
Hi people, I was wondering if anyone else has come across this before.

I spent a fair bit of time deciding between a 22WMR and 17HMR rifle. I ended up buying a 17 as the pros out weighed the cons for my shooting, which is mainly rabbits, rats, possums and magpies

I tried sighting it in and was really disappointed with it's accuracy. Even after 100 rounds it didn't settle down. I even went through and changed scopes, used different cleaning oils etc.

There isn't a lot of ammo brands available for the caliber here in New Zealand as the country is only just getting into it, but I tried Hornady and CCI 17 grain. I was about to pack it all in when I thought I'd try the 20 grain Hornady TNT's. What a difference. I have fallen in love with the caliber now.

Everything I have read about 20 grains are that they wont out shoot a 17 in windless conditions. My rifle loves them. I sight it in at 75 meters (82 yards) as the shooting I do is usually 60 to 85 odd meters in gullies and am easily pulling 1/2 to inch groups. even shots out to and beyond 100 meters dont drop a whole lot.

By all logic a 17grain should shoot better as it is lighter (less drop) and has a tip where the 20grains are hollow point.

I was just wondering if anyone else has had the same thing happen to them.

Offline Keith L

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3781
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2008, 01:07:13 PM »
Every gun likes something different.  Sounds like yours likes the bigger bullets.  All of mine shoot the 17 grains better.  And 100 rounds are not all that many.  If things don't change after 500 or 1000 then perhaps it will stay the 20s.

What gun are you using?
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."  Benjamin Franklin

Offline woodchukhntr

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (108)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2359
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2008, 01:37:56 PM »
I'm shooting a Ruger 77/17 and it shoots very well, under 1" with the Hornady 17 gr. loading.  I have a box of the Hornady 20 gr., but haven't tried them yet.  A local gun shop has a Savage .17 with the thumbhole stock that looks really good.  I'm considering trading the Ruger for it.  Probably a bad move, but that wouldn't be the first time...

Offline bscman

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 260
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2008, 06:32:13 PM »
As mentioned, each rifle likes something different.

I'm glad my marlin likes the 17grainers, though...the only reason I bought this pill was for the Vmax.
I'll admit I'm amazed at it's accuracy given the cost of the rifle (Under $200 for a heavy barrel, wood stock)....

I'd still pick my WMR over the HMR for the hunting I do, but the HMR sure is accurate and makes a great bird-buster out to LONG ranges on calm days.

Once it's broken it you might find it's preference changes a bit--don't give up on the 17grainers all together--come back to 'em in a few hundred rounds and you might be surprised. I know of a few of these rifles that have changed preferences once they were broken in.

Offline Oldtimer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2008, 03:13:17 AM »
I have owned 2 Savage 93's, one pre-Accutrigger, and the other post.  The first, a plain vanilla model, with plastic stock and skinny barrel, shot way better than it had any right to shoot, and the second is just as good, but has a heavy barrel and wooden  stock.  Both shot 17 and 20 grain bullets under 1" at 100 yards.  I have shot several more and all were uniformly accurate, with the exception of one switch-barrel pistol.  It was a tack-driver, though with a .22WMR barrel.  The 20 grain bullet does give much better penetration.  I shot an oppossum at close range, about 15 yards, and got full penetration, with a wound channel of about 7 inches.  I am thinking of using my rifle to hunt wild turkeys this spring season.

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2008, 11:40:27 AM »
Agree with Keith - each gun likes what it likes and if you don't hand lap all new barrels like I do (I have my own method) I would give them several hundred rounds fired to settle down.   In my case all 3 of my Hummer's are early ones bought when only 17 grain pills were available (Hornady V-Max and later CCI TNT's).   All 3 of my 17HMR's like both, two of them shoot both pills to the same POI, all of them easily shoot sub MOA or better, so I never saw any reason to try anything else in them.   

Lots of other Hummer info that may be of interest to you in another recent thread...

http://www.gboreloaded.com/forums/index.php/topic,140571.0.html

L.

Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus

Offline monkey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2008, 08:00:25 PM »
Hey guys,

Keith you asked what gun it was, it is a Savage - blued synthetic - std barrel. i also use a moderator on it as we shoot near some horses some times.

Its now had about 300 rounds through it and still loves the 20 grain. I certainly don't have a problem with that as we often come across hares and the extra penetrating power certainly sorts them out well as well as possums. It's just every write up I read is that 20 grains are a waist of time.

I was just interested to see if anyone else has come across the same thing.

I'm certainly not a person that is concerned if the pills aren't landing on top of each other anyways, but am pleased that i can get great consistency off 20grain rounds. I may even splash put and buy something a bit flasher as this was more an experimental purchase in case I didn't like the decision. (but that will probably be another thread later)

Most New Zealander's are 22 or 22WMR fans, but I am certainly a fan of the HMR.

Thanks all for your posts

Offline Keith L

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3781
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2008, 08:29:04 PM »
I had a synthetic heavy barrel pre-accutrigger Savage that did well with the 17 grain pill but had problems with the 20 grain hollowpoints.  I had to put a Rifle basics trigger in it because the stock one stank.  I understand the accutrigger is quite good.
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."  Benjamin Franklin

Offline basdjs

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2008, 03:38:11 PM »
I shoot a Savage 93 rifle with accutrigger and also just got a 14" custom barrel from MGM for my Encore pistol.  After shooting several brands of 17 gr. and 20 gr. bullets, I found that the rifle will only shoot 20gr. Hornady's with great accuracy and it loves a dirty barrel.  I only clean mine after 200-250 rounds and then dirty it up with a few shots to get back to 1/2" groups at 100 yds.  The pistol barrel is just as accurate with 17 gr Hornady's which are the only rounds that I've tried in it so far.

Offline bscman

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 260
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2008, 05:27:30 AM »
 It's just every write up I read is that 20 grains are a waist of time.I was just interested to see if anyone else has come across the same thing.........Most New Zealander's are 22 or 22WMR fans, but I am certainly a fan of the HMR.
I've found the 20grainers don't expand well in the smaller critters, which can lead to mixed results.In something small like a prairie dog or opposum (that I don't plan to eat/salvage) I prefer the TNT or Vmax rounsd because they dump all their energy into the critter with an "Explosion" of power.On small critters such as these, the HP just starts expanding and exits. You end up with a lot of wasted energy exiting the critter, and a small wound channel. Of course, this is good if you're planning to eat or salvage hides...but means you have to place your shots better and it may take the critter a bit longer to expire. I've shot a few critters with Hornady 20gr HP's and not even been able to find an entrance or exit wound (no blood, either!) That tiny .17caliber bullet makes an awefully small "pin prick" if the bullet doesn't start expanding. This could make tracking a runaway difficult. I've found the HMR to rely heavily on headshots--which it is very capable of doing...but not always an option when in the field.

(Just my experiences).

I'm no New Zealander, but honestly...I do think the 22WMR is a superior HUNTING round.I don't mind sacrificing 300fps if it means my bullet is over 50% heavier, and 30% larger in diameter...the heavier bullet will be more likely to power through bone, penetrate deeper, and best of all--bigger wound channel.I'm not trying to conver anyone, I was an HMR lover too (and still own one)...but I've been disappointed on it's abilities for game over ~10lbs. That knocks a lot of critters off my hunt list--and I don't like that limitation.

Offline just bill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 260
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2008, 07:05:47 AM »
 It's just every write up I read is that 20 grains are a waist of time.I was just interested to see if anyone else has come across the same thing.........Most New Zealander's are 22 or 22WMR fans, but I am certainly a fan of the HMR.
I've found the 20grainers don't expand well in the smaller critters, which can lead to mixed results.In something small like a prairie dog or opposum (that I don't plan to eat/salvage) I prefer the TNT or Vmax rounsd because they dump all their energy into the critter with an "Explosion" of power.On small critters such as these, the HP just starts expanding and exits. You end up with a lot of wasted energy exiting the critter, and a small wound channel. Of course, this is good if you're planning to eat or salvage hides...but means you have to place your shots better and it may take the critter a bit longer to expire. I've shot a few critters with Hornady 20gr HP's and not even been able to find an entrance or exit wound (no blood, either!) That tiny .17caliber bullet makes an awefully small "pin prick" if the bullet doesn't start expanding. This could make tracking a runaway difficult. I've found the HMR to rely heavily on headshots--which it is very capable of doing...but not always an option when in the field.

(Just my experiences).

I'm no New Zealander, but honestly...I do think the 22WMR is a superior HUNTING round.I don't mind sacrificing 300fps if it means my bullet is over 50% heavier, and 30% larger in diameter...the heavier bullet will be more likely to power through bone, penetrate deeper, and best of all--bigger wound channel.I'm not trying to conver anyone, I was an HMR lover too (and still own one)...but I've been disappointed on it's abilities for game over ~10lbs. That knocks a lot of critters off my hunt list--and I don't like that limitation.

For someone whom has just owned a 22wmr for " a few months" you sure do get around the net with your few months oppinion about how vastly superior it is on critters "at or over 10 lbs" .......along with your pitch for the newer "30 grain wmr loads" and how they hit harder than the hmr.

 I have shot hundreds of Woodchucks/Groundhogs  with both wmr's & hmr's along with enough Coons & Fox.  Of the three Woodchucks are the toughest as you must anchor them on spot to keep them out of the hole often just a few feet away.  They fall ideally into your spec. of "at or over 10 lbs".  Guess which rim mag I prefer?  Answer the 17hmr.

A hint about rim mag hunting on critters that size.  Regardless of the caliber choice 17hmr,22wmr or 5mm IMO two things need to happen well regardless of which caliber.  1) Accuracy,  the more the better.  One has to be able to place the shot into the vidals well from field positions.  MOA accurate to 150 yards is preferred.  2)  The bullet has to "work".  By this I mean preferably frag out to at least 125 yards.  There is not foot pounds of energy to spare on pass throughs with any of the three on critters that size.  You have to step up to a 22 Hornet and 45 grain bullets for that.

 The HMR & WMR are far more  similarar than differant if the above two "needs" are met equally there is not one shot with the exact same point of impact and simular style bullet that would anchor one Woodchuck that the other could not match,  . If the above to idems are equal.

The key is finding one that can match the two.  Based on the 3 - 22wrs I have owned and the two 17hmr's I have owned,  in my experiance these two keys are much more easy to find in the run of the mill HMR as compared to the same in WMR.  I have no issue / problem anchoring any of the above size varmints with either at 50 yards,  it's 100,125 to 150 the issues begin and in my case it's 100-125 that 90% of the "kill'in" is done be it roving,walking or set calling.

Last in regards to "hits harder with the 30 grain ammo as compared".  I think you need to look at Hornadys website ballistics before making that statement and compare the bullet makers stats on the 30 V Max ammo vs. the 17 V Max ammo first,  as it shows the HMR has the dge in foot pounds.  And I promice you with it's faster 1/9 twist of the HMR,  as compared to the 1/16 of the WMR,  along with higher velocity,  the HMR will "work" frag at further distance than the WMR and with out question that is where rim mags get their kill power.........not by punching through with energy to spare as with larger center fire varmint calibers.

You really need a 22 Hornet if you want more power for any shot than a rim mag.  Picking one rim mag over the other for kill power is going to see very little  difference...............period................not nearly as much as you want to make yourself  believe.
   

Offline dks7895

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 292
  • Gender: Male
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #11 on: May 06, 2008, 10:51:49 AM »
I own a Marlin 917V with a 3-9x40 scope.  I love this gun.  I use the CCI TNT 17gr cartridges.  I also like the Hornady 20gr XTP for bigger critters.  I prefer to zero mine at 100 yards.  The easiest way to do this is to zero at 25 yards first.  Once that is done, 8 clicks down on the scope.  Now it's zeroed at 100 yards.  I haven't missed a squirrel yet.  If you look at the trajectory table of the 17HMR, with a 25 yard zero it is 2 inches high at 100 yards.  Simple math.  I aim dead on anywhere out to 100 yards and it's good.  Past that I need to aim a little higher.  I also use a Bore Snake after I use it.  Keeps the bore nice and clean.
Winchester 100 .243; Marlin XS7 .308; Stevens 200 .223; Rossi 92 .45LC; Marlin 1894C .357M; Marlin 30AS .30-30; NEF Pardner Pump 12ga; Mossberg 500 Turkey 20ga; Winchester 1200 20ga; Savage Mark II F .22LR; Henry H001 .22LR; Marlin 60SB .22LR; Ruger 10/22 DSP .22LR; Remington Genesis .50 cal ML; Ruger Vaquero .45LC; Ruger Blackhawk .357M; Ruger SR9c 9mm; Ruger Single-Six .22LR; Browning Buck Mark Camper .22LR; Crosman Powermaster 760 .177; Crosman Storm XT .177; Mission X3

Offline drdougrx

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3212
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2008, 03:40:30 PM »
I have a Ruger 77/17 with a timney sear and a Leupold 12x fixed power scope.  I shoot the 17gr hornady with the plastic tip.  It shoots about 1.5" groups at a 100.  The HP loads shoot about 2" ( and the action is glass bedded).  Used the HP on a coyote at 87yrds.  Had to do some tracking and I finally did a finisher w a 38.  Don't ask....was in my back yard at 6:15am and me in suit and tie and the neighbor and I had an agreement that if the coyote came into the yard, I'd....well...never mind.....
If you like, please enjoy some of my hunt pics at:

http://public.fotki.com/DrDougRx

If you leave a comment, please leave your GB screen name so that I can reply back!

Offline ratgunner

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 663
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2008, 04:55:55 AM »
dks7895,I just got a new thumbhole/stainless Savage .17HMR and today I sighted her in useing your method.It worked like a charm and saved me some ammo.Thanks.
"Non Gratum Anus Rodentum"

Offline woodchukhntr

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (108)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2359
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2008, 03:23:08 PM »
Thanks for the sighting-in information, dks7895.  That will help everybody that doesn't have access to a 100 yard range for sighting-in, and help us that do to save some ammo. You might have to adjust windage by a click or 2 at 100, but you should be able to hit a woodchuck at 100 every time even if you don't.

Offline ratgunner

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 663
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2008, 10:00:45 PM »
Thats true,and I proved it this afternoon by shooting four groundhogs at distances from 30-70 yards.
"Non Gratum Anus Rodentum"

Offline gstewart44

  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1645
  • Gender: Male
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #16 on: May 29, 2008, 03:30:25 AM »
My son has a Savage 93 in HMR.    I love this little rifle.   It is more accurate with 20 gr bullets than 17 gr.   The last two targets that we shot had single ragged holes (10 shot groups, no wind) with the 20 gr stuff.  As far as the capability of the round, I have only hunted with the 20 gr.    Over the past two years we have taken multiple squirrels, two turkeys, one coyote, one 23 lb bobcat, and three hogs (60-70 lbs ea).   The yote was shot at the base of the skull, bobcat in the neck, and the hogs were either in the ear or eye.  All of these were bang/flops.   One turkey was anchored where the neck meets the body,  the other was first nailed with a pass through of both legs then finished in the head.   Yardage is below.
Bobcat - 20 yds
Coyote - 45 yds
turkey #1 - 40 yds
Turkey #2 - 65 yds
Hogs  15 - 30 yds.   

I know this little round is great under 75 yds for the critters I hunts.  I am not sure I would take a longer shot on them though. 
I'm just tryin' to keep everything in balance, Woodrow. You do more work than you got to, so it's my obligation to do less. (Gus McCrae)

Offline ratgunner

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 663
Re: 17HMR shooters
« Reply #17 on: May 29, 2008, 02:45:58 PM »
Got four more groundhogs today.Farthest was 75 yards off hand kneeling shot.All DRT.Oh I also missed one at about 30 yards.LOL.Gotta love those .17 HMR's.
"Non Gratum Anus Rodentum"