Author Topic: Replacement stocks, synthetic or wood?  (Read 445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline chucky52

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 348
Replacement stocks, synthetic or wood?
« on: October 25, 2007, 04:38:22 PM »
Likely replacing a busted stock on my busted Beretta. I know nothing about synthetic stocks, any pointers?

Offline MGMorden

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
  • Gender: Male
Re: Replacement stocks, synthetic or wood?
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2007, 08:00:41 PM »
I like wood stocks on my guns.  To me, they look far better than any synthetic. 

Now, with that out of the way, I will say that for ANY gun that I take duck hunting, I prefer synthetic.  Reason is simple: my duck hunting guns get banged up pretty bad.  Wood stocks show that wear and tear a lot more than a synthetic.  So for upland, small game, deer, targets, safe queens, etc, it's wood for me.  For waterfowl, synthetic.

Offline Omaha-BeenGlockin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Replacement stocks, synthetic or wood?
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2007, 02:25:58 PM »
Weight is generally the same or close enough.

The syn stock will take more abuse.

Wood is generally prettier.