Author Topic: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?  (Read 4128 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jobyjob

  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 248
375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« on: October 15, 2007, 08:30:59 AM »
I want to take my 375 H&H deer hunting this fall.

Does anyone have any reduced recoil reloading recipes they want to share? Especially using 200gr to 250gr bullets?

Offline quickdtoo

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (149)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 43304
  • Gender: Male
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2007, 09:33:43 AM »
The Hornady 6th shows reduced loads 2000fps to 2300fps for their 220-225gr bullets using SR4759- 34.4gr start, 42gr max, H4227- 35.6gr start, 38.1gr max(2100fps) and AA5744- 40.5gr start to 47.7gr max. WLRM primer, Win brass, COL 3.340" for the #3705 FP and 3.555" for the #3706 SP.

Tim
"Always do right, this will gratify some and astonish the rest" -  Mark Twain

Offline jobyjob

  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 248
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2007, 11:25:06 AM »
Sa-weeet!

Just what I was looking for.

Thanks Tim,

Mark

Offline EsoxLucius

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 601
  • Gender: Male
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2007, 02:40:33 PM »
.375 H&H Magnum
225 grain Hornady Spire Point
Remington brass
CCI 250 primer
70 grains H4895 (74.8 grains Maximum)
You could start at 64 grains and work up towards 70 until you find a shooter.

Great deer, black bear and hog load.
We learn something new everyday whether we want to or not.

Offline jobyjob

  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 248
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2007, 12:37:40 PM »
Great. Thanks for the suggestion EsoxLucius.

Mark

Offline jager

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 287
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2008, 06:18:17 AM »
A few loads that have worked well in my Whitworth .375 H&H are: 46.0/IMR4895/225Cast;  67.0/IMR4064/250SptBt Sierra;  41.5/SR4759/225Cast; and 64.0/IMR4064/235Speer (all with Fed215 primers and Winchester brass).

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2008, 05:09:46 AM »
Loads that work for me are the 200gr bullet at 3000 fps with 84.7 gr of IMR4350. Recoil isn't bad.

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2008, 05:43:33 AM »
220-225gr bullets using SR4759- 34.4gr starting load, 42.0 gr max for max load. The 34.4 load is a pussy cat. Great for a deer round.
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2008, 05:28:35 PM »
I've heard tell that a .375 H&H with bullets of 270 grains in factory rounds destroys less whitetail deer meat than a factory .270 Winchester round?
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline crow_feather

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1359
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2008, 09:04:49 PM »
Hydrostatic shock from a fast moving bullet destroys more meat than a larger slower bullet.
IF THE WORLD DISARMED, WE WOULD BE SPEAKING THE LANGUAGE USED BY THE AGGRESSIVE ALIENS THAT LIVE ON THE THIRD MOON OF JUPITOR.

Offline EsoxLucius

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 601
  • Gender: Male
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2008, 10:54:49 AM »
Hydrostatic shock from a fast moving bullet destroys more meat than a larger slower bullet.
What is hydrostatic shock?  Its never been proven to exist.

http://www.rathcoombe.net/sci-tech/ballistics/myths.html#energy
We learn something new everyday whether we want to or not.

Offline skippermdj

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #11 on: October 09, 2008, 05:10:19 AM »
I've found the 235gr Speer hot core on top of 69 grains of RL-15 to be very accurate and comfortable to shoot.  Haven't chrono'd it, but you should get about 2600FPS out of it.  Sight in 2.8" high at 100 yards and you should be about 3" low at 250.  I'd guess this would kill most medium to medium-large game very dead, and the terminal performance of the Speer hot core should also be good at these medium velocities.

My Charles Daly 375H&H weighs 9.5lbs with scope and has a good recoil pad.  Calculated recoil energy is around 26 ft-lbs.  This sounds like a lot, but it's less than 2/3 of the energy and recoil velocity when shooting max loads with 300 grainers. 

Good luck!


Offline NFG

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 522
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2008, 07:50:00 AM »
While the Rathcoombe article was a good read...and maybe hydro=dynamic might be a better descriptive word...the use of HYDROSTATIC as a descriptive word used in a specific sense is well understood...and will continue to be used as such...in the vernacular of hunters.  It is also the way word meanings are changed or definitions are added to existing words.

Anyone interested might do a Wikipedia search for "hydro-" which refers to water for more thoughts on the subject.

Besides...one man's opinion, even scientific sounding or developed, doesn't really count for much unless it is or has been scrutinized thouroughly by his peers.  A look at scientific thoughts over the years proves that conclusively.

Hydrostatic shock means one thing to me.  It evokes vivid pictures of many events I've seen and the results of those events.  I really don't care what some quasi-scientific person blowing smoke or spouting "group talk" who may not have ever killed a mammal or seen mammals killed...all kinds of four legged AND two...decides to expound on trying to disprove what I know to be true.  I choose to call it HYDROSTATIC SHOCK, you can call it what you like, but the results are understood.

Or...am I blowing smoke?  ??? ;D ::)

Oh, sorry, got all worked up....In my older years I tend to pick large calibers with the heaviest bullets for that caliber at modest velocities...they seem to kill quicker and you can eat right up to the bullet hole.  Plus you never know what you will encounter out in the woods and a BIG SHOOTER will handle ALL the chores.  I load my 375 H&H with 270-300 gr bullets around 2300-2500 f/s.  Any loading manual will give you several loads that fit that category...pick the load and bullet that shoots most accurate in your rifle and go enjoy.

Offline Savage_99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2008, 10:09:07 AM »
I have a cast bullet load using IMR's SR 4759 for the .375 H&H.   That powder really cuts the recoil.  Some of the higher powder charges suggested here  with slower burning powders will kick more.

I shot a whitetail in the ribs with it and it dropped the animal just fine.


Offline Hank08

  • Trade Count: (35)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 887
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2008, 04:48:26 PM »
Hey Esoxlucius, want proof, shoot a gallon jug full of water , observe what happens, that's exactly what happens when you shoot a blood filled animal.  That's what turns your meat to jelly, call it what you want, I call it hydrostatic shock. 
H08

Offline S.E.Ak

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 808
  • Gender: Male
  • Wrangell Ak
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #15 on: November 18, 2008, 07:06:08 PM »
Hydro shock is that big void you see following the bullet in ballistic gel,I guess most call it the wound channel and cavity.

Offline Larry Gibson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2008, 05:56:47 AM »
NFG echoes my opinions exactly.  Rathcoombe argues semantics and definition not actual occurance.  I'll continue to call it "hydrostatic shock" also as it does exist.  Real hydrostatic shock actually doesn't occur until 1900-2000+ fps impact velocity.  However a slower moving larger diameter flat nose bullet or a fast expanding bullet can move a lot of "hydro" out of it's way and cause considerable collateral damage.


Larry Gibson

Offline Hank08

  • Trade Count: (35)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 887
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2008, 07:16:42 AM »
One yr. I shot 2 bucks just a few days apart.  One at about 100 yds. with a .338 Mag and a 250 Sierra spitzer at 2700 fps.  The other from about 75 yds. with a .44 mag Super blackhawk and a 240 gr. jacketed flat pt.  Both hits were the same, behind the left shoulder and out thru the right shoulder.  The one hit by the .338 hit the ground like he was hit by a truck and stayed there.  The one hit by the .44 ran about a 100 yds. leaving a huge blood trail in the snow.  The interesting thing was there was more blood shot meat from the .44 hit than from the .338.  Just the opposite of what would be expected.  While the shock didn't appear to be as much, the HYDRO whatever destroyed the meat even at that low velocity.
H08

Offline corbanzo

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2008, 10:51:31 AM »
Hydro - water
Static - still
Shock - disruption

You take something still and wet, you hit it with something fast, the energy is transfered through the medium disrupting it.  Remember newtons third law?  As the bullet slows down the energy has to go somewhere, it goes into the animal. 

By definition, it exsists, I have seen it, we all have seen it. 

REAL hydrostatic shock depends on surface tension of the medium.  When the shock is enough to break the tension holding the tissue together, that is where you see the evidence... the hydro part once again because the energy is transfered through fluid.  The bullet is going to damage the liver or lungs much more than it is going to damage muscle, because the surface tension of the muscle fibers is much greater than that of the softer organs, and the organs contain more fluid, better transfering the energy. 


Now what you see is evidence of hydroshock, the shock actually extends beyond the damaged area, as the energy drops below the level which will break the tissues tension, you no longer see it as clearly evident further away from the wound channel. 

Bigger bullets which carry MORE energy don't do as much damage, because they don't slow down as much, meaning the tissue is not absorbing as much energy.  The smaller faster bullets are slowing down more, thus transfering that energy into the tissue. 
"At least with a gun that big, if you miss and hit the rocks in front of him it'll stone him to death..."

Offline bulletstuffer

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 694
  • Gender: Male
  • Overkill begins when hair shoots out the antlers.
Re: 375 H&H reduced recoil load suggestions?
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2008, 03:23:52 PM »
I've tried the 235 grain speer but couldn't get them to group as well as I liked.  Never shot a deer with one of these bullets only paper.  Thinking of trying reduced loads with cast bullets for this some day. The 375 is my favorite deer gun and I use the 260 and 300 grain nosler partitions.  Overkill maybe, but it gives your hunting buddies something to talk about in camp :D

Good luck,

Bulletstuffer
I am the first to work when I have to and the first to go on vacation when I can!  God Bless America!!!