Author Topic: IMR 4350 vs. H4350  (Read 699 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jpuke

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
IMR 4350 vs. H4350
« on: June 14, 2003, 04:19:09 AM »
Are 4350 and H4350 close enough in burn rate that their load data is interchangeable?  I've got a good load for IMR 4350 but I want to H4350 because it's one of their "extreme" powders.  My Lyman manual (47th edition) doesn't show any data for the Hodgdon powder.

Offline richp41

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
IMR 4350 vs. H4350
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2003, 04:39:18 AM »
While they are close H4350 and IMR 4350 are NOT the identical and data for one should not be used for the other. This is one of the primary safety rules in reloading. Even in the same brand and different lots you need to start low and build up. Rich P

Offline Hcliff

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 233
IMR 4350 vs. H4350
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2003, 05:45:18 AM »
Don't exchange them.  Thay are close but different.

Hodgdon is a great manual to have on the shelf too

Hcliff

Offline IronKnees

  • IronKnees
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 399
  • Gender: Male
    • HANDLOADING FOR HUNTING
IMR 4350 vs. H4350
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2003, 05:48:46 AM »
I agree with you about changing because the H4350 is one of the "Extreme" line of powders... it meters better too because of it
s smaller size, but like the others, I would not interchange the data... I have a brand new Hodgdon manual, and if you want to email me, I will be glad to send you the data you need... I don't post data, but if you twist my arm, I can be talked into emailing it... Dave
I want to finish well
I want to end this race
Still leaning on HIS AMAZING GRACE