Author Topic: My 416 Remington  (Read 1868 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
My 416 Remington
« on: September 04, 2007, 01:49:19 AM »
My 416 zeroed at 150 yds shoots to 200 yds with out changing the scope. The Ft Lbs are down a little tho. The bullet is a 400 gr. What do you think?

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2007, 02:21:23 AM »
I always wounded why you and Phil try to push your guns to the max fps. I get better accuracy when I don't push my guns to the max load or over.
But that sounds lke a good zero.
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline gsp71

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2007, 02:46:16 PM »
I think that's good to know. I have a 416 sited in at 100 yds and have not fired it past that range. However I had a similar experience with a 300 RUM. It is zeroed at both 100 and 200 yards. It's a tad high at 135 yards.

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2007, 02:26:33 AM »
I always wounded why you and Phil try to push your guns to the max fps. I get better accuracy when I don't push my guns to the max load or over.
But that sounds lke a good zero.



Redhawk1 I always thought that the rifle was made to handle MAX loads. I could go a tad faster but that would cause problems. I'm only going 2410 FPS with the 400 gr bullet recoil doesn't me. If you can't handle recoil then its wise to slow down a bit and save it for when you really need it.[ faster FPS ]

Offline Syncerus

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2007, 09:55:06 AM »
What is your intended target? The only game that might require maximum velocity with 400 gr slugs is the cape buffalo. Everything else is usually shot with solids (hippo, ele) where you don't need that much velocity or lighter slugs (bear, cats) ...

Is there any hunting target where a 400 gr bullet moving 2400 fps would be more effective than a bullet moving 2300 fps? Not trying to be negative, just trying to understand you goal.
Don't vote for Socialists.

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2007, 11:43:17 AM »
I always wounded why you and Phil try to push your guns to the max fps. I get better accuracy when I don't push my guns to the max load or over.
But that sounds lke a good zero.



Redhawk1 I always thought that the rifle was made to handle MAX loads. I could go a tad faster but that would cause problems. I'm only going 2410 FPS with the 400 gr bullet recoil doesn't me. If you can't handle recoil then its wise to slow down a bit and save it for when you really need it.[ faster FPS ]

My point is, why push the max fps when you may find a better and more accurate load not pushing the gun to the max. If I feel the need to push a gun to the max, it is time for me to get a bigger gun. It is not the recoil that I am afraid of, it would be more the damage prolonged max loads on the gun.
I just think accuracy in more impotent than speed, but that is just my opinion.
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2007, 02:27:50 AM »
But Redhawk1 I get excellent accurateracy at 2410 fps. Bullets on top of each other at 150 yds.

I did get a bigger rifle also. The CZ 550 American Safari 458 Lott.

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27106
  • Gender: Male
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2007, 04:57:33 AM »
You guys sure have tougher shoulders than me. If I were to fire those guns you're talking about that shoulder surgery I've been putting off hoping it will last as long as I do would be required immediately. I remember back when I thought I was invincible and shot those stompers. Now I'm paying the price daily with shoulder pain and even a .270 requires a thick PAST pad when fired on the range.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2007, 02:18:35 AM »
Graybeard, Sorry to hear that about your shoulder. I've shot with those PAST pads before they are great, But mine kept slipping around on me the time I used it.

Offline Ken ONeill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Gender: Male
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2007, 07:47:40 PM »
I certainly agree that accuracy at reasonable (effective) velocity ought to be the goal. However, what works in one .416 Rem. Mag. may not work in another. My own Remington 700, which I used on Cape Buffalo, Hippo, and Australian Water Buffalo, gave its best accuracy using  400 gr. Hornady softs and solids @ 2267 fps avg.
 However, a couple years later, when I was able to get a Custom shop Winchester Mdl. 70 stainless synthetic, that gun would absolutely not shoot satisfactorily until I hit 2400 fps. Then the groups shrunk to half the size of the 2250-2300 fps loads groups.
Whatever it takes....
In a moment of foolishness, I sold the 700 several years ago, but still have the Mdl. 70. I always zeroed both guns about 2" high at 100, resulting in being a couple inches low at 200 or 220. In actual practice, the furthest I've ever shot a game animal with either gun was about 80 yds. on a Hippo. All the buff and a couple of Brown Bears were all shot at between 50-60 yds.

Offline while99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 286
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2007, 08:43:31 AM »
For practice, I use the 350 grain Speer at about 2400 fps. in my Model 70 Classic .416 Remignton magnum.  Use the starting loads in the Speer manual and work up by .5 grains until you find acceptable accuracy.  The recoil seems to be much less with the 350 grain bullet when compared to the full-power 400 grain loads.  Also, the 350 grain Speer costs much less than the 400 grain bullets, such as the Nosler partition.     

Offline jro45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: My 416 Remington
« Reply #11 on: October 26, 2007, 03:09:53 AM »
I have some of those 350gr bullets loaded and have found the same as you said.  I still like the 400gr bullet going 2410 FPS.