I am wanting to buy a crossbow, but am on a budget, so the entry level Barnett or Horton bows are what I have been looking at.
I used to hunt with a compound bow, but several years back I was blinded in my right eye in a work accident. I gave up shooting bows, because I have a hard time pulling back a hunting weight bow left-handed. I have never shot a crossbow, so forgive what may be a stupid question.
When comparing the same brand and draw weight bows, what are the disadvantages of the recurve and the compound design. For example, Horton makes the Summit 150# compound and the SteelForce 150# recurve. The recurve is less expensive, and from what I've read, vibrates less than a compound. What advantages does the compound offer that would justify the cost difference.
Thanks in advance for your input and opinions,
Jon