Author Topic: toughts on the kimber montana ?  (Read 1017 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline superdown

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 708
  • Gender: Male
toughts on the kimber montana ?
« on: July 19, 2007, 09:17:31 AM »
hi guys just wanting to know what y'all  thought of these little buggers because i am moving to Idaho and need/want a really light hiking rifle it will be a 308 class round 260-338fed . i already have a browning a-bolt II hunter 325wsm with lupy 2.5-8x36 and a kimber eclipse custom II 45acp. the reason iam so concerned with weight is because as most of us know i will doing alot more walking than shooting thanx in advance for your thoughts. superdown

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2007, 02:51:14 PM »
I have one in .300WSM and  I love it.  Yes, it is quite light.  I have a leupold 3.5x-10x-40mm VX-III mounted in Talley Lightweight Aluminum one-piece rings. - GREAT COMBO!

With Factory Federal Premium 180 Barnes X it shoots about 1 1/4 to 1 1/2" at 100.   With Federal Premium 180 Nosler Partitions, it shoots about 1" at 100.  That's very good accuracy out of such a light gun.

However, you should know that the recoil from the .300WSM in such a light gun is pretty wicked.

Zachary

Offline targshooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 491
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2007, 03:24:27 AM »
superdown,
It seems you hunt as I do, backpacking in, setting up camp and then still hunting. I would offer this. The Kimber weighs 5 lb 2 oz according tho their literature. When backpacking in I have the rifle in a scabbard attached to the backpack, and an extra 1-1 1/2 lb on the rifle over this means nothing to me. When I am still hunting I have a small rucksack with my food, drink, and emergency supplies in case I get lost or injured. The rifle weight at this point is not critical, and my stalking rifles weigh 6 1/2 to just under 7 lbs without scope. I use fixed power low magnification scopes in the Ruger rings, so the sight/ring weight is just over 1 lb. additional. I would like to add to Zachary's caution about recoil in the light rifles. I am not recoil sensitive, and I have shot scoped rifles weighing in under 6lb in .308 and .30-06. It is not something that will encourage lots of practice shooting with the firearm. I personally consider my Ruger Model 77 RSI in .308 (used with a peep it weighs just over 6 7/8 lb) as light a rifle as I want to practice with a lot, so the scoped Kimber will probably be okay if recoil does not cause you problems. I have handled their standard rifle and it is nicely made with good metal to wood fit and a nice finish on both wood and metal. For me, it shoulders well and points true. I hunted with a fellow owning one and shot it during our sight in sessions at the club. I would own one if I did not already have my hunting rifle battery. That said, there was a firm named Kifaru that offered some extremely light rifles. They make a great backpack.

Offline Bigboar

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 315
  • Gender: Male
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2007, 06:55:53 AM »
I have a Model 2400 in 270 WSM and what a great rifle light and a tack driver.  I don't think you can go wrong with any Kimber rifle or pistol.  Just great workmanship all around, great service, I'll be ordering one in 325 WSM soon looks like a great caliber.  Good luck with your decision.

bigboar


Offline superdown

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 708
  • Gender: Male
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2007, 09:45:46 AM »
thanks for your insight everyone i think i am leaning towards the 308 because  i am moving to Idaho in few months and want something that's easy to find in the boonies and i dont think that will be the case with 325wsm /cheaper .

Offline sidekick

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 121
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2007, 01:37:57 PM »
I have a Montana in .308 with a Zeiss Conquest 3X9. It's near perfect for my style hunting.  When sighting in or shooting for groups, shoot one, wait a couple minutes, shoot, wait, etc. and you will be pleased with the accuracy. Hot barrel opens the group up though. Mine likes Hornady 150 or 165 equally well, or Georgia Arms 150 which are cheaper. I normally handload, but just haven't seen the need with the accuracy I get from any of the above. Doesn't like Federal 150 though for some reason. Federal 165 seem okay however.

Offline superdown

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 708
  • Gender: Male
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2007, 05:02:51 PM »
 :D that's funny i bought my dad a pair of those little 10x25s compact zeiss binos and have been thinking of putting a conquest on the kimber ever since i am just so happy with the zeiss product very few companies impress me.

Offline jimmyp50

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 147
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2007, 07:02:58 AM »
I like the wood gun better as well. The Ruger's are great just a tad heavy. I decided on the Kimber Classic in 300WSM. I put Talley low lightweights on it, and a Zeiss Conquest 2.5 x 8 x 32MC.  I reload and with 180 grain Accubonds over 65.9 grains of RL19 it produces .6-.8 inch groups.  It took me a while to learn to shoot it due to recoil (which I am used to now) and if you don't wait about 3 minutes between shots it opens up a bit to 1 inch.  What I like about the gun is that it shoots to thhe same POA with 165 grain Accubonds, 180 grain ballistic tips and 180 grain accubonds at 100 yards.  This took some playing around with powder charges but there it is. Note -keep good records.  The Montana just seemed too light to me in a 300WSM but there are those that shoot them well.  The Zeiss, scope is my third one I don't like the brown reticle in a Leupold and the Zeiss is more clear to my eyes and has a black reticle despite the lighting conditions. I will buy another Kimber but it will be a 308 Montana which I feel I could handle.   
Jimmyp50Georgia

Offline Prophet

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2007, 10:53:54 AM »
I have a 7-08 and I really want the 270wsm just need a little more cash and it is mine. I think it is the best gun I have ever owned.

Offline superdown

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 708
  • Gender: Male
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #9 on: July 25, 2007, 06:41:12 PM »
 :) it would be cool if a few could post some pics of their kimber rifles looking at beautiful firearms is always enjoyable thanks,superdown

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #10 on: July 26, 2007, 03:52:09 AM »
If I have some time this weekend, I'll take a pic of mine and post it.

Zachary

Offline superdown

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 708
  • Gender: Male
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #11 on: July 26, 2007, 07:40:37 AM »
 :) thanx

Offline Gmountain

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: toughts on the kimber montana ?
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2007, 05:06:28 AM »
Here's my .338 Federal with a Bushnell 4200 Elite