Please no defeatists attitudes here, it won't hurt to try, but if we don't try it will never happen.
Rocket, since you seem to have developed a rapour with Gordon, especially on this subject,I do think YOU should call Gordon back and get both an e-mail address for Gordon and a "snail mail" address for him and post it here so we could send him those same requests, he could have a hard copy and his time would not be taken up as muchj.
Also as far as the new Marlin/H&R people listening, the .35 Whelen with a 22" barrel? No one requested that, how many wanted a 7.62x39? I never heard of throngs of people rushing to get one. And a .444 Marlin next year? OK but why? they have the 45-70, .500 S&W, and a .44 Mag. Perhaps they will sell 40 or 50, big deal. I think thier efforts should go into quaility control and as Rocket advocates bringing back the ejector barrels and if possible offering both, which I think is a stretch. Think of this though, bring back the ejectors and polish the chambers so we the customer do not have to do it, this in itself should cure any sticking problems, then we the cunsumer could easily convert the ejector to an extractor IF we wanted one, and it could be changed back with just one inexpensive new part, AND that also could be done by the consumer.
The company should not make changes just to make changes, or to make it easier for them if it is against the best interests of the customer. Those changes they do make should not be as ill concieved as it seems many are, they start out well but somehow are pretty well fouled up by the time they come off the production line, so much so that they do not fullfill the desires of the customer. How about a little more care on barrel fitting (popping open) on new guns also, as well as chamber and throat lengths, now there is a biggie with a simple quality control fix.
hey may have fixed the simple problem of stiripped screws in the butt plates/recoil pads and I applaud them if that problem has gone away. I love thier product, it would be so easy to make it SO MUCH better. Lets start with some quailty control, smoother chambers, and a return of ejectors.
As was said many times when the change to extractors was first discussed, the one thing the change to the cheaper extractors does iis save money for the company, however it also lessens and cheapens the product, and by the way,I did not see a price drop when they started saving money by eliminating the preferred ejectors....<><....