Oh yeah... Why the hell do you people want to go to a third party site and read any other version than the real one...
Kind of the point, in a really obscure way, of my addressing the above post. People get in the habit of finding a snippet and throwing it out there like the gospel. Its misleading. Lets just say I had a feeling Mr. Fazak would check the source. Had my 2nd reply in my mind probably before he got done typing his rebuttal. A little deceptive on my part, I apologize for that.
But people also get in the habit of being critical of someone else for expressing an opinion, even one's that may be ill formed. I'm a terribly sarcastic person by nature, but now it seems to be the time to be more constructive in correction, rather than critical of someone's potential or perceived a$$ talking.
Mr. Greybeard, I would never allow the opinions of another person outweigh my own objective research, unless I knew that person well. Mudslingers in general get placed on the "ignore" or "grain of salt" list. Quite a few of them I see, but that's the beauty of a forum. If nothing else, its fun to watch how the mudslingers react next. Gives me insight on dealing with children.
When it comes to politics, no amount of information is sacred, and its easy to just read what someone else says on all topics, with the click of a button, and ta-da, you at least have a snapshot of who you can put some faith in and who you can't.
I have the senate and house websites, federal and a few states outside of my own on shortcuts. I've read (too) many legal documents, just trying to figure out why my elected officials voted the way they did. If I have any doubts, I write them.
Enjoy the rest of the primary's.