Author Topic: Radical Reconstruction  (Read 924 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JPSaxMan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1779
  • Gender: Male
Radical Reconstruction
« on: September 21, 2005, 10:40:29 AM »
As some of you as historians might now, this was the 12 year period following the Civil War in which the Union had to make a decision; what to do with the South now that the war is over.

There were two approaches, Lincoln's approach aka the Presidential approach, which was to reunite the country as quicklessly and painlessly as possible. The other approach was made by Republicans (aka Rad Reps) to punish the South for breaking away from the Union. Through and through the Rad Reps got their say in for 12 years until President Hayes wins the 1877 election and removes all Union military control from the South. This movement then allowed the spawn of KKK and White Camilia, but that aside Rad. Recon. was over.

What are your thoughts on this period of time in which the South developed it's great hatred for the North (that still might carry on today)?
JP

Attorney: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in
his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?

Doctor: Did you actually pass the bar exam?

Proverbs 3:5 - Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding

Offline Shorty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1098
Radical Reconstruction
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2005, 01:02:41 PM »
JP,
Well, all I know is what I read in the paper...(Will Rogers)

That said, I'd say that the occupation by Federal troops during that time was mostly to ensure the orderly transition of freed slaves to citizenship.  It was the only period that saw blacks voted into congress.  Without the occupation that wouldn't have happened.  After the withdrawal, Jim Crow and the KKK saw to it that it didn't happen again for a long long time.

Offline ironfoot

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 547
Radical Reconstruction
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2005, 05:42:02 PM »
Act the way you would like to be, and soon you will be the way you act.

Offline Shorty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1098
Radical Reconstruction
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2005, 01:33:09 PM »
Ironfot,
Heavy, Dude!  :wink:
Disregarding the Iraq comparison, I expected to recieve withering fire from an opposing opinion.  :?
The Christian Science Monitor has always had a reputation for unbiased reporting.

Offline Telahnay's g'son

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 374
Radical Reconstruction
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2005, 11:27:10 AM »
As a grandson of the Confederacy, unreconstructed Southerner and diligent cynic of the Federal (Yankee) government, consider the following comments as input for the original question.

June 1865, ~75% of the population (black & white) living in north Alabama and middle Tennessee were listed by the authorities as existing in a state of starvation.

The was nothing left, either of value or edible.  Both sides had "foraged" the countryside into oblivion.

The failure of the Northern Country (states north of the M/D line) to handle the situation in a humane fashion was evident.  Rather, the radical republicans saw this as their opportunity to "re-colonize" Dixie and make it a state in the mold of how they saw things ought to be.

Gen. Forrest formed the KKK predecessor at Pulaski, Tennessee largely in response to the execution of his men (as they surrendered) by the Federal garrison commander as spies.  As much like the (original) IRA in Ireland was formed as a quasi-law enforcement entity to combat the results of English oppression, the KKK later morphed into something much different than the original article.

Many, many courthouse records such as deeds, abstracts, etc. somehow caught fire resulting in the dispossessing of many landowners of their property.

Gun control laws.   Where do you think they originated?   Yep, it was a product of "reconstruction" and (initially) applicable to the Confederate States of America.  Even the National Rifle Association (1871) was a product of the War of Northern Aggression as retired Federal officers formed it to encourage/teach civilian marksmanship in light of the dismal overall field performance of the Federal troops during the (first) Revolution of 1861-1865.

Time may alleviate the rancor and animosity which is still present in the Occupied States (CSA) among it's citizens.  Heck, it's only been 800 years and the Irish and English are already engaged in dialogue.
NRA Life Member
DU Corporate Sponsor
DW Sponsor

Offline Jim N Mo.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Radical Reconstruction
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2005, 03:22:04 PM »
Nice to see someone not tie Bedford Forrest to what most people of today think of the KKK . Very seldom is it mentioned that the focus changed from when it started or that Forrest left the group because of what it became . Much like connecting the Confederate flag to racism . You would think it only ever had one purpose if you listen to todays media .