« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Laminated VS. Mcmillan on Rem. Mountain rifle  (Read 642 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jcurrie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Laminated VS. Mcmillan on Rem. Mountain rifle
« on: July 22, 2004, 04:33:47 AM »
I recently purchased a Mcmillan stock for a Rem. 7MM Mag. BDL and I like it so much that I am considering replacing the laminated stock on my Rem. 270 Mountain Rifle. Is this a good idea, or should I just be happy with the laminated stock? Your thoughts  please.  jcurrie
Logged

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Laminated VS. Mcmillan on Rem. Mountain rif
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2004, 04:44:56 AM »
I think there may be a weight difference, with the Macmillan probably being lighter. But I'm just speculating. I'd say that if you like the Macmillan, go for it.  I like the looks of the synthetic stocks more than I like the look of laminated.
Logged
Safety first

Offline smoky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
    • http://www.cattletoday.com/sscc
Laminated VS. Mcmillan on Rem. Mountain rif
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2004, 05:18:12 AM »
If you go to McMillans website, you will see that they now offer a lighter weight stock.  Should work well with the Mountain Rifle.

Smoky
Logged
Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »