Bullet didn't exit!

[gypsyman]

 Made a post about if they found the bullet. Just read, the bullet didn't exit the body, doctor found it just under the skin. I'm assuming the back of the neck. The doctors claim, Charlie was in great shape, and his bones must have been like steel. Sorry, can't believe this.  '06, 200 yds., didn't go thru the neck?? Fox news, Economic Times, News Nation, and several others have headlines that state this. Having dressed out a few deer, I had a .44 mag go thru one at 60 yds or so. Longer this goes, the more BS I'm reading into this!

[Dixie-Dude]

Some have said, the bullet hit the top of his body armor and glanced upward into his neck.  Probably paralyzed him from the neck down as well as knocking him out.  No nerves sending signals to the heart and organs caused them to shut down. 

[DDZ]

There is a lot I don't believe about this. It hasn't been confirmed he was wearing body armor. Yes, if it was an 06, and was hit directly in the neck, as they are claiming. The bullet would pass through.  Also its a great stretch of the imagination to believe the text exchange is real.  LOL the doctors claim that his bones must have been like steel, is nothing more than smoke and mirrors. 

[Dee]

Speculation/conspiracy theories go hand and hand. Ever set in on an autopsy? I have. When a bullet strikes an object, tissue, bone, clothing, ect. it can completely change directions. There are dozens of 30 caliber rifle bullet configurations to choose from, whether factory loading, or home reloading. Armor piercing, or those designs that all but disintegrate on impact. And NOBODY yet knows what kinda bullet was used.
And of course, everyone one knows that there aren't any bones in the neck (such as neck vertebrae, ect). Only veins, and tissue that could have caused the bullet to change direction.
I noticed that when Charlie was throwing caps to the crowd, minutes before he was shot, he was wearing a ordinary white t-shirt, and after  watching several more times, I saw no evidence of any type of body armor. But many people can't believe what they see. Maybe i shouldn't believe what I saw. 
But then again, if one accepts the logical explanation of the shooting of Charlie Kirk, and the autopsy report, it just wouldn't be that mysteriously suspicious, or interesting. 

[Goldie]

Made a post about if they found the bullet. Just read, the bullet didn't exit the body, doctor found it just under the skin. I'm assuming the back of the neck. The doctors claim, Charlie was in great shape, and his bones must have been like steel. Sorry, can't believe this.  '06, 200 yds., didn't go thru the neck?? Fox news, Economic Times, News Nation, and several others have headlines that state this. Having dressed out a few deer, I had a .44 mag go thru one at 60 yds or so. Longer this goes, the more BS I'm reading into this!

.  Seems like the moment this started ( poor Charlie) a whole bunch of supposed information is BS. Kinda like the last FBI leader ship to me anyway. IMHO.

[gypsyman]

Some have said, the bullet hit the top of his body armor and glanced upward into his neck.  Probably paralyzed him from the neck down as well as knocking him out.  No nerves sending signals to the heart and organs caused them to shut down. 

Seems to be the most logical explanation. Not sure how many levels of body armor they make anymore, use to be 3. But a glancing shot off would have slowed down that bullet quite a bit. Speculation ! R.I.P Charlie.

[ironglowz]

  The attending doctors were surprised that the bullet did not exit. Even though the unusual strength and density of Charlie's bones was remarkable, they still considered it some kind of a miracle that the bullet didn't pass through to wound or kill others, who were behind Charlie.

    https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/charlie-kirk-didnt-have-exit-wound-turning-point-spokesperson-says/

   I would rather consider the possibility of a miracle, rather than a conspiracy... a miracle such as God seems to have performed when that clown tried to shoot Pres Trump !

   Did God flick the bullet with his mighty finger ?

[Dee]

Longer this goes, the more BS I'm reading into this!

. 

I'd certainly agree with that.

I don't think I've ever seen a more transparent investigation in the shooting of a public figure, given the online unedited videos of the pre-event, including the actual shooting, the release of evidence by the prosecutors, law enforcement, and even the governor, yet still some insist on creating a conspiracy, demanding the truth, and then rejecting the truth, while seemingly ignoring the obvious.

[GTS225]

I don't think I've ever seen a more transparent investigation in the shooting of a public figure, given the online unedited videos of the pre-event, including the actual shooting, the release of evidence by the prosecutors, law enforcement, and even the governor,

As a sidebar to this statement and discussion, I can't help but have mixed feelings over the release/publication of case info.  I can't help but wonder if, ultimately, it won't taint the prospective jury pool, causing the defense to argue that the defendant can't possibly get a "fair and impartial" trial, thus negating any possible prosecution.
Maybe I'm stretching the idea here a bit, but it seems that the release of TOO much info is also a bad thing.

Just my opine.....Roger