I'm glad you can see the cross hairs in that reticle.  I had the same scope on my 223 and swapped it out because I'd loose them against a dark background.  They were just too fine for these old eyes 

   Other than that, I liked the scope.  For a fairly inexpensive scope, I thought the quality was excellent.  They're nice and clear., and you're right about the adjustments being great.  The parralax adjustment works well.
That was nice shooting.  I had a great morning with the "new" .22-250.  We just finished second cutting alfalfa, so the range was clear.  I bought the rifle used with a Tasco Euro Class 3-12 X 52 on it.  The rifle would not shoot.  Changed scopes....same thing.  I sent it up to Brian.  He re-barreled it and it's now a tack driver with the original scope.  I fine tuned it to 300 yards yesterday morning.  My last three shots were two touching and the third 3/4 inch right.  All center of the target.  I wish I could shoot like that away from the bench 
 I know you've told before about using the .223 for squirrels and posted the load, but I don't recall what it was.  I know you said you had less meat damage than with a .22.  Interesting.  I'm going to play with that this fall.  One of my dogs "Charlie", a Feist, needs some field work before season, so I think I'll take him out this coming week and knock off some reds.  I'll probably use a .32-20, either the Handi or the Marlin.  A lot of folks don't use a rifle for squirrels, but living in farm country, you instinctively line up the target with something solid behind it.  It doesn't matter if it's a deer, woodchuck or squirrel.  It's a lot more of a challenge to pop the head off a bushy tail rather than dust him with a shotgun.
If you get up this way, give me a jingle.  Perhaps we can get together and shoot.
Pete