
Well I followed the link and those reading it and believing it all will be sadly mislead. It's quite inaccurate in a lot of ways. It infers that what they call "Polygonal rifling" is new ................... it's not it fact the Henry form and Metford form rifling was of a polygonal type and they were in use in the 1880's. Hammer forging is also not new the German MG34's used it as the Hammer forging also increases the surface hardness of the bore and so made the rifling last a bit longer as the MG 34 had a very fast rate of fire and ate normal rifled barrels.
In hammer forging the barrel blank is bored and reamed to a constant size and smooth finish then the hardened mandral (often carbide or Stelite) is inserted and the blank and mandral enters the hammer forge. Both BSA and Parker-Hale used Rotary Hammer forges. The second one at Parker-Hale they built themselves neither P-H not BSA had polygonal rifling. BSA used the fllowing rifling patterns:-
6 groove 1 in 14 RH twist for .222 Rem, .223 Win and .22-250 Rem
6 Groove 1 in 10 LH twist for .243 Win
4 Groove 1 in 8.66" RH twist for 6.5x55
4 Groove 1 in 14 RH twist for 7.62x51 Nato
5 groove 1 in 10 LH twist for all other calibres and chamberings (which is basically Enfield form rifling).
I do not have the information to as the P-H twist rates but they also from my observations I have looked at the following P-H rifles .22-250, .243,6mm Rem, .270, .308, .30-06, 308 Norma magnum, ,375 H&H and .458 Win mag and all have the normal form land and groove

.
It's also interesting to note that before BSA used the hammer forge their barrels were cut rifled and hand lapped. I only wish i knew exactly when the hammer forge came into oeration and if it completly replaced the cut rifled barrels or did they produce both at the same time? rememebr that BSA were also producing barrels for their Air Rifle line up which was an important part of the sales worldwide.