Author Topic: ? for experienced cast shooters...  (Read 2620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Duffy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 660
? for experienced cast shooters...
« Reply #30 on: August 13, 2003, 08:45:00 PM »
Cool!
Keep us posted!

Ryan

Offline Chuck from arkansaw

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 100
? for experienced cast shooters...
« Reply #31 on: August 24, 2003, 06:43:24 PM »
This is a great thread.  I like the point about H110-296 not being a good powder for "reduced" loads.  I shoot the Lee 310 gr. a lot.  How is accuracy without the gas check?  I tried another Lee bullet in gas check design without the check and it was awful.  With the GC it shot well.  I would try to get 1,100 fps. out of the reduced load, bullets at that speed fly well out to 100 yards.  Blue dot might be a useful powder for these loads.

Offline sawfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 215
  • Gender: Male
? for experienced cast shooters...
« Reply #32 on: September 17, 2003, 11:09:45 AM »
8) Just an observation on AA #9.  It is an excellent powder, and was one of the propellants found to be most successful in developing loads for the .454 Casull.  However, if you are using a progressive press, pay particular attention to the powder measure cycling.  The grains are so tiny, they can, and do, cause binding of the charge bar in some brands of powder measures, which causing incomplete cycling of the charge bar, and results in dangerously low, or high charges.

I have found this with two different brands of powder measures.  This is not a condemnation of AA #9, just a reminder to be especially diligent when using this powder in a progressive setup.
No such thing as too dead.

Offline tony212

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 280
? for experienced cast shooters...
« Reply #33 on: September 23, 2003, 01:38:38 AM »
I have been using 8grains of SR4756, a CCI 350 primer and a TnT 240 grain TC cast bullet.  Velocity is about 750fps, acuracy is excellent and recoil hardly noticable. It is an excellent load for an afternoon at the range. It doesn't beat up the shooter or the gun.  For hunting I switch to a 240 gr. XTP and WW 296 powder at 1200 fps.  
   I'm not really sure you need a 310 grain bullet to kill a deer, but would be nice to have velocity at least 1000 FPS, and closer to 1200 if you can get it. :D

Offline ras308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 167
Cast
« Reply #34 on: September 23, 2003, 09:03:18 AM »
I load a 240 grn. hornady swhp over 16 grns. of 2400.  Out of an iron sighted 7 1/2" super blackhawk, it will shoot a easy 2 inch group at 25 yards.  I have personally shot long ways through the body of a corsican sheep at 25+ yards, this includes breaking the rear leg bone.  My friend with the same load, has had a passthrough (broadside) on a hog and a deer.  We are talking about close range, but I have no doubt it would do this out to fifty yards for sure.  I do not have a chrono, but I am sure these loads will not exceed 1,000 fps.  The big bullets are great, but they also punish you.  Unless I were going to shoot bear or very large hogs, I would stay away from the 300+ grainers.  Just my 2 cents worth.  Thanks.

Offline Darrell Davis

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
  • Gender: Male
? for experienced cast shooters...
« Reply #35 on: September 26, 2003, 06:55:58 PM »
:D Hey there Shooters,

I expect you are all correct about the lack of "need" for the 300+gr slugs, HOWEVER remember what has been said about  the man with one gun.

I figure on ONE hunting load for my rifle and ONE hunting load for my hand guns. I have my reduced/plinking/banger loads but they have no business in the field. One load per gun even if? it is "to heavy," as there is no such a thing as too dead.

Keep em coming! :wink:
300 Winmag

Offline myronman3

  • Moderator
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4837
  • Gender: Male
? for experienced cast shooters...
« Reply #36 on: September 27, 2003, 05:55:15 PM »
i have settled on 9 grains unique with the 310 gr. lee.   been shooting it alot in anticipation of the upcoming t zone hunt (antlerless only).  i am about a month from season and am getting quite proficient with this load.  i can hardly wait.

Offline 340wby

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
? for experienced cast shooters...
« Reply #37 on: October 09, 2003, 09:31:29 AM »
myronman3
I think you will find even if that low velocity, that adding the gas checks that hard cast bullet was designed the use will increase your accuracy, in my 44 Smith & Wesson I normally used 21-22 grains of H110 with the bullet seated out as long as possible and still seat inside the cylinder length, I get just above 1200 ft. per second, and I think you will find like I have that it does an outstanding job on killing dear, I cast my bullets using 4% to 6% tin added to wheel weight metal
if you want to reduce the recoil level using a jacketed hollow point 240 grain bullet will work well on deer for lung shots but it opens too fast or shoulder shots on HOGS, after loading for most of my friends and their 44 magnums we have all settled on using the same load of 21 grains of H110 under that 310 grain Lee bullet, two of us using 445 Dan Wesson supermag's use that bullet over 29 grains of accurate arm 1680  for almost 1600 ft. per second which makes for noticeable increase in power, but of course that noticeable increase in power is not necessary on deer or hogs, and probably isn't necessary even on Elk.  But I sure am sure am going to do my very best to irritate some large Elk with that 445 Dan Wesson the first chance I get, and I'll let you know how well it works when I get back. But that's not going to be until next year because I just had surgery on my ankle and the surgeon says it will take several months to heal

Offline myronman3

  • Moderator
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4837
  • Gender: Male
? for experienced cast shooters...
« Reply #38 on: October 09, 2003, 03:48:04 PM »
thanks for sharing your experiences with that bullet.  i was thinking on trying gas checks before too long because it is leading a little more than i would like and i am curious to see how it affects accuracy out at 100yds.  right now i am good to 75.   at 100 it is getting iffy.  maybe the addition of a gas check will change that.   i will get back on this one....
go easy on that ankle, hope things go well for you.