i did a study some months ago re: the metallurgy of Rem's 416 stainless vs. the 410 stainless in the weatherby vanguard. the 410 is probably better because it is less 'porous' due to a lesser quantity of sulfur in it! the sulfur makes it easier to 'work' with the stainless for a gun barrel.....but i prefer a stainless that won't wear out as readily.
the metal i've seen and read about with Rugers tells me that their stainless is probably superior to Rem's 416 as well. i really believe that Rem' makes a very accurate rifle. but for hunting with a stainless rifle i'd go with either Ruger or Weatherby......
a couple years ago i re-worked a Ruger trigger on a few rifles....per the instructions on
www.centerfirecentral.com they came out very well. just be careful to keep the angles proper and to polish the metal with 600 to 1000 grit wet-n-dry paper.
i re-worked a vanguard trigger doing some stoning and polishing similar to what i'd done with the Ruger. but it wasn't as easy to finish the job of assembling/adjusting the weatherby vanguard. the Ruger was definitely easier.
take a look on the web 'search' and you may agree with what i found re: the metallurgy.
what do the others says on this forum?
ss'