I'd like to know who the real masterminds were behind 9/11. Those planes didn't bring those buildings down. Controlled explosives did, just like Building 7 that collapsed and wasn't even hit by a plane. Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, unless it's being compressed and pressurized with oxygen, when the engine is running. Pretty sure those engines quit running when the planes crashed into the buildings. To many demolition experts and architectural engineers know, it just wasn't the planes that brought them down. Of course, if they do sue Saudi Arabia, maybe the truth will come out?
Well, we have gone through this years ago..just after the event. Conspiracy theories abound, but an airliner crashing into such a building can do the job.
A few facts,
1) The steel did not need to melt, in order to collapse the floors immediately effected by the crash and jet fuel. When heated to a dull red, the strength of steel is reduced to nearly half the pre heated strength.
2) ...Not hard to see how the heat would rise very high in a short time. The already flaming fuel would flow down the elevator and stairs shafts, those air shafts would soon become would become venturi, creating a huge blow torch effect, just as my forge produces.
3) Once the immediately involved floors collapses..the next lower floor being pre heated cannot take the added weight, since it is only built to support itself.
from there down the floors crash exponentially, since trher are many floors weight being slammed upon them.
4) Yes, it collapsed inward and downward, since that is how it is designed to do, architects knowing it is standing within a city scene.
If one thinks the government pulled a "fakse flag", just to provoke a war in the ME...it could find an excuse without absorbing anywhere near as much damage.
Consider what some have said the blow up of the USS Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 entailed..
In 1939, Hitler found an excuse to invade Poland, by pulling a false flage attack on a border radio station.
