Author Topic: Got One Now...........  (Read 1488 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
Got One Now...........
« on: April 25, 2004, 10:12:46 AM »
After all my recommending Savage bolt actions to everyone without owning one, I decided to put my money where my mouth is.  Last night I picked up my new Savage Model 10GXP3 - with AccuTrigger in .270 WSM.  I had wanted one in 7mm WSM but the shop owner had this one but it had arrived with a broken scope.  Got everything but the scope for $380.00 out the door.  Mounted a Burris Signature Series 4-16x 44mm with Posi-Lock scope on it last night.  Loaded up 100 rounds using 64.0 gr. of H4831sc behind 130 gr. Hornady SP to break the barrel in.  Hope to get out to the range this afternoon and see for myself just how accurate these are out of the box.  More to follow.  Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Got One Now...........
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2004, 10:52:35 AM »
I'm more curious about what your thoughts are on the accutrigger.  There's just something about having a little trigger in the middle of the main trigger than just doesn't warm up to me.

Quality issues aside, Savages, for whatever reason, are generally quite accurate rifles.

Let us know how she works out.

Zachary

Offline longwinters

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3070
Got One Now...........
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2004, 11:06:20 AM »
:? Ok Lawdog, I gotta ask;  Being quite new to the whole reloading thing.  You said you loaded up 100 rds for breaking the barrel in and to find out how accurate the rifle is out of the box.   How do you know this particular load etc... will be accurate out of that rifle?  The powder type, load amount, OAL etc...lots of variables.  I can see the breaking in the barrel but would appreciate your thought process/experience with the accuracy thing.

long
Life is short......eternity is long.

Offline Dave in WV

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2162
Got One Now...........
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2004, 12:19:34 PM »
Lawdog, how could you?  :wink:  A savage AND a Burris scope? Not a RemchestersakotikaRug rifle and a Leupold?   :-D   I hope you enjoy your new toy. Good shooting. Dave :D
Setting an example is not the main means of influencing others; it is the only means
--Albert Einstein

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
Got One Now...........
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2004, 11:54:15 AM »
longwinters,

There is no way to know if any load is accurate in any rifle.  It's a crap shoot but that is what makes shooting and reloading so much fun.  As far as this load goes, 64.0 gr. of H4831sc behind a 130 gr. bullet, it was given to me by a fellow shooter.  He gets good accuracy from his Winchester M70 .270 WSM using it.  I figured it was as good a place to start as taking a loading manual and running your finger down the sheet until you find one that tickles your fancy.  I like H4831sc powder and use it in many of my other cartridges with good results.  The reason I chose the 130 Hornady bullet is because I happen to have a lot of them.  Bought ten boxes off Ebay over two years ago for $50.00.  Also my .270 Weatherby gets it’s best accuracy with 130 gr. bullets as does my son’s .270 Winchester.  This load in no way will be the load I will be using for hunting.  Out of the box accuracy is just that.  I mounted the scope, laser bore sighted the rifle and that is all.  The first three sight-in shots will tell the story as far as out of the box accuracy goes.  Didn’t get to stop by the range last night, hope to get there tonight.  Small groups and tight lines to you.  Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline Coyote Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2534
Got One Now...........
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2004, 07:14:38 PM »
Lawdog -

First, congrats on your new Savage - in my experience they are way under-rated by most folks.  My old 110E was "ugly" according to Daughter #2, but it could shoot --- at least until I wore the barrel out.  The new Savage rifles are good looking, have a great trigger, and should shoot just as well or better.  Hope you enjoy the Savage for many years to come!

But...


Quote from: Lawdog
...
As far as this load goes, 64.0 gr. of H4831sc behind a 130 gr. bullet, it was given to me by a fellow shooter.  He gets good accuracy from his Winchester M70 .270 WSM using it.  I figured it was as good a place to start as taking a loading manual and running your finger down the sheet until you find one that tickles your fancy.  
...


Here I'm going to disagree, if only for the potential benefit of longwinters and others who may be new to reloading.  To them I say this: listen to your friends if you want, BUT ALWAYS VERIFY AGAINST FACTORY, PRESSURE TESTED DATA AND WORK UP TO MAXIMUM DATA SLOWLY.  The point of the game is to have fun, not blow yourself up!   When I first started reloading it was for my 7mm Remington Magnum.  A friend suggested a load of xx grains of IMR4831 with a 160g bullet.  Although the load was slightly over the maximum listed in the then-current #10 Speer manual, I trusted my friend.  Instead of working up the load in my rifle I went straight to xx grains.  The result was very short case life (4-5 loadings) and a couple of separated cases.  That was over 20 years ago.  Within two years I had reduced my powder charge by 2 full grains and have not had a case failure since with less than 18 reloadings.

Here is the data from Hornady and Hodgdon:

Hornady
WW brass
WLRM primer
Hornady 130g SP
START:  55.5g H4831 - 2800fps
MAX:  62.9g H4831 - 3100fps

Hodgdon
WW brass
WLRM primer
Hornady 130g SP
START:  63.0g H4831 - 3085fps
MAX:  67.0g H4831 - 3228fps

Your load is reasonable according to Hodgdon -- IN THEIR TEST BARREL -- but beyond max in Hornady's test barrel.  Nosler lists 62.5g H4831SC as the starting load for their 130g bullets, for 3065fps, and 65.5g/3239fps as the maximum load.  You load is probably not going to blow you up, but it may be beyond where it should be.


longwinters -

Lawdog is hardly incorrect when it comes to choosing a powder - if a particular powder works well in a particular cartridge for a friend, it is reasonable to expect that it may work well for you, too.  The only issue I have with his methodology is that we don't know if he verified the powder charge against factory data before building 100 loaded rounds.  If he has a sticky bolt lift or other pressure signs, he'll be tearing a lot of rounds back down.

Let me explain my methodology in a moment, but first let me recommend you get a chronograph.  You can go to Shooting Chrony's web site ( http://chrony.ca/sc_mc-MV.html , bottom of the page) and pick up a reconditioned but perfectly good chronograph for under $50.  If you plan to be working up to maximum loads, a chronograph is your best friend.  Although chrono's don't measure pressure directly, velocity is a fairly reliable indirect measurement -- if you are matching or exceeding published velocities, you are at or very close to maximum pressure.  A chrono will also tell you things about your loads that group size alone cannot.

Let me also suggest you use manuals which publish actual pressure as opposed to "does not exceed" pressures.  Hodgdon and Accurate data lists actual pressure, many other manuals use the "does not exceed" type pressure data.  I would also suggest that you can't have too many manuals.  Accurate, Alliant and Hodgdon list load data on their web sites, as do some bullet manufacturers - especially for new cartridges.  Get all you can for free and all you can afford that isn't free.  The Hodgdon Annual Manual is an outstanding value - it sells for about $8 and has over 5,000 loads with actual pressure, many of which are not on the Hodgdon web site.

OK, to my methodology.  My goal is always to find accurate loads - velocity without accuracy is about as interesting to me as a 80-year-old hooker with AIDS.  Here's how I generally work up loads:

1. Collect all the current load data I can find for the bullet weight and cartridge in question.

2. After reviewing the available data, select a powder.  (A whole topic in itself, so I won't get into it here.)

3. Determine the starting and maximum powder charges I am interested in.  The maximum may be considerably less than the published maximum, and on occasion it may be slightly more.  

4.  Build loads in .5g increments, from the starting powder charge to the maximum I am interested in.  Sometimes I will build the same number at each charge weight, but not always.  If I believe the final load will be well above the starting load, I may only build 1 or 2 loads at the starting charge, 2 or 3 at the next charge weight, and so on, until I am building 4 or 5 at each charge weight.  If I exceed the published maximums I will usually taper off the number of loads built.  When I am done building loads I may have 35 to 40 to take to the range.  Loads are bagged in baggies, sorted by powder charge, as soon as the bullets are seated - and a slip of paper goes into each baggie identifying the powder charge.  Then all the little baggies go into a larger baggie along with another piece of paper identifying the bullet, primer, powder type and maximum load data (powder charge and velocity).

5. At the range, starting with the starting powder charge, I shoot the loads over a chronograph.  I write down the powder charge, individual shot velocities and the group size for each powder charge.  This is generally done slowly enough that the barrel stays relatively cool (shoot a group, then wait).

6.  If I see any signs of pressure (sticky bolt, difficult extraction, split cases, etc.), STOP.  The remaining loads will be taken home and disassembled.

7. If I match or exceed published velocities, STOP.  Now is a good time for caution.  I may well choose to continue, but only if I have good reason to believe it is safe.  (Example:  SAAMI maximum for the .257 Roberts is 45,000 CUP, but +P data is 50,000 CUP.  Also, I know that Ruger uses the same action for cartridges with 52,000 and 53,000 CUP SAAMI pressures.  If I exceed SAAMI 45,000 CUP velocities I know I can go to +P velocities without a problem - and I can probably exceed them by an additional .5g or 1.0g powder and still be well under dangerous pressures in the Ruger.  But nothing is certain, and I don't recommend such actions.)  If I choose not to continue, as is usually the case, the remaining loads will be taken home and disassembled.

8. Back at home I enter the shot velocity and group sizes into a spreadsheet.  Then I let the spreadsheet calculate Average Velocity, Standard Deviation, and Extreme Spread.  (If you want a copy of the spreadsheet, drop me a PM or email.)

9. I review the numbers, looking for "dip" in Standard Deviation.  Generally Standard Deviation will get down to around 10fps, often under, and generally my most accurate loads will be found in the immediate neighborhood.  After reviewing the numbers, I will select a particular powder charge to be my standard.  Knowing that I can easily mess up a group, I tend to choose based more on minimal Standard Deviation than minimal group size.

That's a lot of rambling, hope it provides some useful information somewhere!
Coyote Hunter
NRA, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
Got One Now...........
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2004, 09:12:26 AM »
Coyote Hunter,

A good standard policy when dealing with any load information you get from anyone(friend, foe, famous or infamous) is to "Check It Out First" before ever touching a loading press.  A good rule of thumb is for any load you are not sure of is to start at least 10% under the stated weight charge to be safe.  As far as Hornady manuals go I don't use them, don’t even own one(see no reason to own one).  I have found that their stated loads start way under what other manuals post and most likely do so for legal reasons(like the Ruger trigger).  I check out loads by the powder company that makes it.  In this case Hodgdon.  By every manual I own 64.0 grains of H4831sc showed to be under the max limits posted.  Just wanted to clarify why I posted that load.  Small groups and tight lines to you all.  Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline Coyote Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2534
Got One Now...........
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2004, 10:28:56 AM »
Lawdog -

I figured you had probably checked, just wanted to emphasize for newbies that taking a friend's load on faith (as I did with the 7mm Mag all those years ago) is a good way to lose appendages.   :shock:

Looking back, I got lucky.   :grin:

I will also confess that I still don't always work loads up like I should.  When I sold my Savage and got the Ruger .22-250, I had two different loads built and in the safe.  Rather than work back up to them, I decided that the 52g loads were middle of the road pressure-wise and I would just try a couple.  No problems, and in fact I later put 4 of 4 into 0.5" at 200 yards with them -- so I'm keeping that load unchanged.  My 40g loads were near max, but I decided to try one of them as well.  Dumb, perhaps, but i considered it a reasonable risk based on the results with the 52g loads and the Ruger's strength.  Once again, no pressure problems and good accuracy - that load is staying unchanged, too.  Wouldn't recommend that anyone else try that, though.

Let us know how those .270 WSM loads do.
Coyote Hunter
NRA, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

Offline longwinters

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3070
Got One Now...........
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2004, 11:09:39 AM »
I e-mailed Hornady asking about the discrepencies between their loading data compared to other reloading sources:  including their own website where their published velocities, for ammunition, are well above what they allow for reloads.  This was a couple weeks ago and still no reply.  Somehow I doubt I will get one.  I like their Interbonds but like so many other companies I guess their customer service is poor.

long
Life is short......eternity is long.

Offline jvs

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1539
Got One Now...........
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2004, 12:11:04 PM »
So when are we going to find out how Lawdog did with his new Savage?
 If you want to run with the Wolves, you can't Pee with the Puppies.

Offline acearch72

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Got One Now...........
« Reply #10 on: April 29, 2004, 07:30:02 AM »
I am more interested in the Burris scope than the Savage rifle.  I have a Savage and I know it shoots.  I have posted several times on this forum asking for advice/comments on the Burris Signature series and have never gotten a response.  I was thinking of upgrading to a Burris Signature series 4 x 16 x 50 with mil-dot and posi-lock.  Any comments on the Burris Signature vs. Leupold Vari-x III (4.5 x 14 x 50) or Ziess Conquest (4 x 14 x 44), both of which I currently own.

Offline Fla Brian

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 266
Got One Now...........
« Reply #11 on: April 29, 2004, 08:11:07 AM »
Apropos of what Coyote Hunter has said, when I got my 8mm-06 IMP wildcat carbine, it came with a box of handloads. Needless to say, I have never, nor will I ever, fire one of them, having no idea what might be inside those cases, or the condition of the cases themselves for that matter.

It is my inflexible rule never to use anyone else's handloads, ever! The one time I broke that rule, using a friend's cartridge in my Smith & Wesson 19, I got one that he had inadvertently forgotten to charge with powder. Fortunately, the bullet locked up the cylinder, so I was unable to even try firing another one - not that I would have, since it was obvious that there was something wrong with that one.

When working up loads, I don't always even reach maximum charge weights, seeking accuracy more than anything else. I recall a particular batch of .223s I made up for my 788. They were right at the maximum from AA. They were accurate, but I had a bunch of neck separations. I won't go there anymore.

For you beginners out there, the point is that each rifle is different, and a load that will be fine in one rifle, might be too hot for another. Operate with caution. The digits you save might be your own.

As for what Lawdog said about Hornady's low listed charges, I remember reading an article by H. V. Stent in a past issue of Handloader's Digest, commenting on how listed charge weights for the .30-30 had drastically declined from earlier to later editions of the same maker's manuals. He got some fairly irate answers from the companies, and an especially hot reply from Ed Matunas.

When I read between the lines of some of the replies, it became obvious that the real reason for the changes was not the actual safety of the loads, but fear of lawsuits.
Brian
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Instructor
NAHC Life Member
Nil sine magno labore.

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
Got One Now...........
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2004, 12:55:46 PM »
To All,

I will be reporting just as soon as I can get to the range and not find it packed with shooters.  Last night there was not a table open.  Going to go Sunday morning and be there when they unlock the gate.  

acearch72,

As far as Burris scopes go I prefer them over Leupold for one reason, $$MONEY$$.  To me that is the only difference.  Same lifetime warrantee and the same quality craftsmanship.  I don’t use the Mil-Dot reticular but I do really like the Posi-Lock system.  I have Burris scopes on a number of rifles.  Works great.  PM me if you have any other questions about Burris scopes.  Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline DirtyHarry

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 567
Got One Now...........
« Reply #13 on: May 10, 2004, 10:13:23 PM »
Lawdog, did you ever make it to the range with your new Savage???
The early bird get's the worm, but the second mouse get's the cheese.....

Offline azshooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 297
Got One Now...........
« Reply #14 on: May 11, 2004, 04:26:02 AM »
I had a PM from him where he had some very nice results.  I will let him fill in the details.

Offline jvs

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1539
Got One Now...........
« Reply #15 on: May 11, 2004, 09:31:22 AM »
I wait with anticipation for Lawdog's report because I've heard at my local gunshop about Competition Bench Rest shooters taking a Savage .223 right to a competition from the shop, sighting it in, and winning.

That, and what other Savage owners tell me about the accuracy of their hunting rifles.
 If you want to run with the Wolves, you can't Pee with the Puppies.

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
Got One Now...........
« Reply #16 on: May 11, 2004, 12:30:10 PM »
Update - I got to the range last Sunday, May 2nd.. First three sight in shots went into a group that measured .593". Group was 3 7/8" high and 3/4" left of center. Love those laser bore sighters. A couple of adjustments and the Savage was putting the bullets exactly 3” high @ 100 yards. The groups the rest of the day averaged .567", not bad for a so called "ugly" rifle. I am going to be trying different loads to see just how accurate this new Savage really is. The Savage is not a fancy rifle, no added goodies, just a plain rifle that gets the job done dependably, accurately. Exactly what most hunters are looking for in a hunting rifle. Now comes the work finding a good hunting load. I will continue to post what happened with this new Savage. Small groups and tight lines to all. Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline jvs

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1539
Got One Now...........
« Reply #17 on: May 11, 2004, 02:00:15 PM »
What is the trigger weight from the factory?

Did you try to adjust the trigger yet?

What kind of rifling?

and last but not least...........is it about what you expected or is it better?

Alot of shooters I know are changing their minds about Savage, some quicker than others.
 If you want to run with the Wolves, you can't Pee with the Puppies.

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
Got One Now...........
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2004, 10:31:36 AM »
half_inch_group,

Quote
What is the trigger weight from the factory?


The trigger pull on my M10 was set at 3.4 lbs. when I got it.

Quote
Did you try to adjust the trigger yet?


Yes, I adjusted it down to 2.2 lbs. before going to the range.  It is easy to do, just follow the instructions that come with the rifle.

Quote
What kind of rifling?


The M10 in .270 WSM comes with a twist rate of 1 in 11".

Quote
and last but not least...........is it about what you expected or
is it better?


Considering the number of new Savages I have seen at the range and those that I have personally fired, my M10 is performing just as I hoped and expected it would.  I had no idea of what to expect from the load I used.  It was given to me by a friend that got good accuracy from his rifle using that load.  I am loading a few different premium bullets, Barnes Triple-Shock X-Bullets in 130 and 140 gr. TSX Boattail version as I have heard very good things about these bullets.  Nosler Partition and AccuBond because I know Partitions work and I have been getting great results with the AccuBonds from my .375 Weatherby and H&H's.  I have had good luck using Barnes X bullets in other calibers so I am really looking forward to excellent accuracy with the Triple-Shock X-Bullets.

My M10 confirms what I have been saying - The most accurate, out of the box, factory mass produced rifles a person can buy today are Savages.  The one thing that I did change was the recoil pad.  I installed a Pachmayr Decelerator pad before shooting.  The one recommendation that I would make to Savage is to install a better quality pads on their magnum calibers at least.  While some may say the Savage rifles are 'ugly', I say how can anything that shoots as well as these new Savages do be all that 'ugly'.  A great looking wrapper on the outside doesn't guarantee a great preforming product on the inside.  A 'plain Jane' rifle that does what it says it will do at the price of a Savage is a bargain in my book.  Small groups and tight lines to all.  Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline FishWithTeddy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 1
Savage 10fp-le2
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2004, 11:22:03 PM »
My equipment is a Savage 10FP-LE2 chambered in .223 with a 26" barrel.  

Just wanted to be one more person to vouch for Savage's out-of-box accuracy.  I'm a coyote hunter in Arizona and haven't missed yet!  From the bench, my Savage shoots sub 1" MOA up to 250 yards... beyond that I can't see close enough with my cheap Simmons 3x9x50 and have to guess where to line up the crosshairs.

I noticed someone requested info regarding Burris Signature Series scopes.  While I don't have that kind of scope, I do use the Signature rings with rubberized polymer ring-liners.  I'm not sure on the firearm lingo you all use for this type, but this simple invention, apparently the first of its kind...  makes the cheapest of scopes perform beyond expectation.  The grommet-like buffer provides shock absorption, position tenacity, and forgiveness in a scope's imperfections.  These rings are essential to Tasco Optics users, as Tasco is known for their great clarity, but slight reticular movement due to recoil shock.

-Teddy
Quote
Carpe P.M. ~ Seize the night

Offline jvs

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1539
Got One Now...........
« Reply #20 on: May 13, 2004, 12:20:30 AM »
Quote:
What kind of rifling?

The M10 in .270 WSM comes with a twist rate of 1 in 11".


What I meant is :

Is it button rifling (micro-groove) or deep cut?

Thanks for your reply
 If you want to run with the Wolves, you can't Pee with the Puppies.

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
Got One Now...........
« Reply #21 on: May 13, 2004, 12:06:48 PM »
half_inch_group,

It is my understanding that all Savage rifles have button rifling(could be wrong here).  Sorry for the misunderstanding.  Small groups and tight lines to all.  Lawdog
 :D
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.