syrian rebels anhilate Christian village. These are the ones hussein supports.

[powderman]

Syrian Rebels Massacre Christian Village    Someone tell me again why we would want to help these animals?

While President Obama’s administration weighs overt military aid to Syrian rebels, the true character of the revolution underway in that country is becoming horrifically clear. Numerous press reports are providing details of a massacre perpetrated by the Free Syrian Army that annihilated the entire population of a Christian village.
As the New York Times reported last December, anti-American sentiment has grown among the rebel organizations even as the American government has played a key role in propping up the rebellion. A crucial step in that support was the administration’s decision to give formal recognition to rebel organizations — a step just short of recognizing them as the legitimate government of Syria. But now, those rebels Obama has vehemently supported are now proving that in Syria — as in Egypt several years ago — the rebels may prove worse than the tyrants they struggle to overthrow.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-...istian-village 

[wolverine_1]

Obviously the killing of all those in a village, any village, is not acceptable; however, christians have largely supported the present government according to news reports.  In these situations, you pays your money and takes your chances.  I.e. it's a crap shoot on which side to support.

[powderman]

WOLVERINE. Christians have had it better in syria than a lot of the muslim nations because assad was more tolerant than others, of course they supported him. The muslim brotherhood, that obama supports, is NOT tolerant of any religion that won't bow down to satan, their allah. POWDERMAN. 

[BBF]

On which side of this are the Israelis again?

[powderman]

On which side of this are the Israelis again?

 
bbf. Unless one of the 2 sides, both enemies, attacks Israel they won't have a side. Assad  wants them to fight him so the other you know what countries will help him.POWDERMAN. 

[garbhead]

Probably the same group John McCain met with the other day.

[gypsyman]

Stay the hell out!! Another lose-lose political situation. Oh Wait, there could be a win-win situation. Kill 'em All, and let God sort them out. gypsyman

[powderman]

Probably the same group John McCain met with the other day.

 
GARBHEAD. Yes, mccain met with the rebels, thats who he and hussein support. Rebels== obamas muslim brotherhood, same ones he's backed in all the other takeovers. POWDERMAN. 

[lakota]

This Syria debacle stands as a prime reason to vote 3rd party. We cant trust the party of Juan McCain and we sure as hell cant trust the party of the lord, savior, and messiah Obama, so who does that leave to vote for? All of these "mainstream" politicians need to be put out of thier jobs

[scootrd]

Probably the same group John McCain met with the other day.

I'll always commend him for his Service and sacrifice to our country.
However, as a politician I have lost almost all respect for McCain over these past number of years.
Time for the old guard to go on both sides.

[dwalk]

IMO...since the end of the Korean War, the US has adopted a "No win" policy no matter whose side we choose to be on.


think about it: WWII...we, and our allies, kicked the slats out from under Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and Fascist Italy in less than four years.


Korea: an armistice after three years of bloody warfare...IIRC, nearly 80,000 dead Americans and nearly 10,000 MIA...over 7,000 STILL missing...congress would not allow a 'victory'


Vietnam: fifteen years of war...that's right...fifteen years...don't believe it? look it up...our first "Advisors" entered 'Nam in 1957 and that was the first recorded combat casualty recorded there...i was in that part of the world in '62 as an "Observer"...that status did NOT stop the VC bullets...


we finally withdrew in 1973 after no clear VICTORY...just a "Pull out"...fifty-eight thousand dead and billions of dollars for what? congress, clearly, had a "No win" policy...


first Iraq war: "Mission accomplished"...true...we did eject the Iraqi army from Kuwait...but...we should have eradicated Saddam then so we wouldn't have to have go in there again.


while it's true there were some small victories between then, the end of WWII and now, Grenada and Panama, those were hardly major engagements on the same scale as Korea, Iraq, VN, and Afghanistan.


so...what's my point, you ask?


my point is: if, mind you IF, we have to go to war...go to war prepared to WIN...once you are victorious, then, and only then, may you afford generosity.


BTW: IMO Barry is not of any particular belief...his support of homosexuality is proof he is not Christian. Christianity does not support, advocate, or condone, homosexuality; it advocates that one REPENT from homosexuality. Islam dictates the death penalty for homosexuality.

[powderman]

my point is: if, mind you IF, we have to go to war...go to war prepared to WIN...once you are victorious, then, and only then, may you afford generosity.


BTW: IMO Barry is not of any particular belief...his support of homosexuality is proof he is not Christian. Christianity does not support, advocate, or condone, homosexuality; it advocates that one REPENT from homosexuality. Islam dictates the death penalty for homosexuality.
 

     DWALK. Good post Sir, all true. In the 1st gulf war our military was allowed to do what was necessary, I loved Arnold Schwarkov. I remember a libby reporter sticking a mike in his face as he was getting ready to accept surrender. The reporter said, are you going to negotiate a treaty?? Arnold said, treaty hell, I'm going to tell the SOB what he's going to do then make him do it. The surrender and treaty was wiorthless, as is the word of any muslim. POWDERMAN.