Author Topic: Remington 105 CTi  (Read 1359 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ND Sharpshooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 71
Remington 105 CTi
« on: August 06, 2007, 03:54:07 AM »
Am thinking of buying a Rem 105 CTi and have heard mostly negative reports about them...hard Kicking and difficult loading are the main two complaints that are making the rounds here.  Do any of you have any info to share about this gun?  Thanks.
Never said I didn''t know how to use one.  :wink:

Online Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27158
  • Gender: Male
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2007, 05:36:42 AM »
I've seen and held them and wasn't impressed. I guess I just can't get passed the fact the receiver isn't steel. I refuse to buy those guys which use aluminum in place of it also. Just a personal hang up of course but for me it was enough. I have no information for you on the function of them.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline 30-06man

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2604
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2007, 03:25:45 PM »
the gun doesn't appeal to me. its sorta ugly to my eyes. i would rather buy a frachi, or bretta for the money.
The sportsman lives his life vicariously. For he secretly yearns to have lived before, in a simpler time. A time when his love for the land, water, fish and wildlife would be more than just part of his life. It would be his state of mind

Rick

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2007, 03:24:07 AM »
I handled one and liked it. It's light and shaped well for easy carry. So if you carry a 12 gauge a lot it could be a good option. If, as you say, it recoils more, then that's just a trade-off for the light weight. If you're not shooting it a lot, it shouldn't be an issue. There are a lot of guns today that are non-traditional cosmetically, like with various checkering patterns, and synthetic stocks on shotguns. Those are the times.

I'm wary of the heavy recoil statement because I don't recall reading anything to that effect about it in the magazines that reviewed it. Chuck Hawks usually tells it like it is. Here's what he has to say http://www.chuckhawks.com/rem_105CTi_shotguns.htm

My overall impression was that it's a field gun with a lot of good qualities. I don't think I'd buy one for clay shooting because loading and ejection seemed awkward for a clays gun.

As to looks, I thought it looked fine. I liked the finish on it. It's not blued, it's one of the more durable good looking finishes I personally prefer.

I read quite a lot about it because it was a major release by Remington. I don't recall reading anything by high praise with a few minor issues mentioned.

If I wanted a lightweight autoloader for field use, I'd take a good hard  look at it.
Safety first

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2007, 03:31:10 AM »
I meant: "I don't recall reading anything BUT high praise."
Safety first

Offline 30-06man

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2604
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2007, 10:21:50 AM »
personally i think its ugly and not cut out for anything but trap/ skeet. i would rather have a frachi reconnaissance for the money
The sportsman lives his life vicariously. For he secretly yearns to have lived before, in a simpler time. A time when his love for the land, water, fish and wildlife would be more than just part of his life. It would be his state of mind

Rick

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2007, 05:00:51 AM »
I assume that those calling it ugly haven't seen it up close. I agree they're not the most photogenic shotguns, but when actually handling it, it's a good looking gun. I think it would make a nice waterfowling gun too because the receive is not open to the elements as much as most autos are.
Safety first

Offline 30-06man

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2604
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2007, 01:12:06 PM »
i have held one. i don't really like it, i don't like the carbon fiber and the styling of the stock. a synthtic would be better for waterfowl though
The sportsman lives his life vicariously. For he secretly yearns to have lived before, in a simpler time. A time when his love for the land, water, fish and wildlife would be more than just part of his life. It would be his state of mind

Rick

Offline RaySendero

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
  • Gender: Male
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2007, 02:12:39 PM »
I've seen and held them and wasn't impressed. I guess I just can't get passed the fact the receiver isn't steel. I refuse to buy those guys which use aluminum in place of it also. Just a personal hang up of course but for me it was enough. I have no information for you on the function of them.


Ditto here too!

I gave away my last aluminum receiver auto almost 20 years ago and still to this day will not buy another - Especially one that has such a skeleton frame!!!!

I don't care for "light shotguns" - Heavy ones swing smoother.  Is it more important to carry the gun or shoot it???
    Ray

Offline Omaha-BeenGlockin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 864
Re: Remington 105 CTi
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2007, 07:29:15 AM »
Get a SxS-------all steel and lightweight----best of both worlds.


Carrying is very important when you're kickin up pheasants all day.