My wife just started a new job and she gets a decent discount on firearms. I need a new rifle for all around use here in Alaska. The problem that I have is that I was looking at a Remington 700 CDL SF in 30-06 limited for around $830. I really like this rifle, but since it is a limited edition I was unsure about using it as an all around gun, especially with a walnut stock. The problem is with my wife's discount at the store they do not carry Remington, but only Ruger. They have both the stainless/laminated $460 and the stainless/synthetic $430. They have the laminated in .338 and 30-06 and the synthetic in 30-06, .300win and .338. I would probably replace the stock eventually on either as that is one of the drawbacks that I have about either. I am not sure if the Remington is really worth the additional cost. If I do decide to get the ruger I am debating over the 30-06 in laminated or the .300win in synthetic. I would replace the stock with a bell and carlson camo finished synthetic stock <$200. As for caliber I will be hunting moose, caribou, black bear, and brown bear. As for scope I will be putting a Leopold VXII 3-9x40 matte. I was also looking at possibly putting a Timmeny Trigger on the Ruger. Even with all the additional costs of the aftermarket parts it is still less then the Remington. Please give me your input on Rifle/Caliber choice.