Author Topic: .375 Ruger  (Read 810 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Swampman

  • Guest
.375 Ruger
« on: February 13, 2007, 12:23:59 PM »
I sure wish Remington would chamber this in a stainless 20" barreled M700 with a laminated wood stock.

http://www.sportsafield.com/FAQ/375Ruger.htm

Offline Ratltrap

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 137
Re: .375 Ruger
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2007, 12:33:51 PM »
If this cartridge gets into some good platforms it'll give the 338 and the 375 H&H plenty of competition for new gun sales. I bet Remington puts it in their Zastava rather than the 700 though.

Personally, I'd be more tempted by a CZ 550 than either of the Rems.

Offline deltecs

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
  • Gender: Male
Re: .375 Ruger
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2007, 07:12:44 PM »
Like many enthusiasts, I too have wondered just when a manufacturer was going to market a case that didn't have a belt on it for the public.  Dakota and others started the trend and then the majors Win and Rem.  They too though used the design of the 404 Jeffrey case as the base.  It seemed to me obvious that the case could easily be made by removing the belt and keeping the base diameter the same as the rim, you could achieve greater powder volume.  Our hunting calibers are sufficiently powerful and the hype for one compared to another is marketing only.  The game couldn't tell the difference in getting hit with a .280 rem, 7x57 Mauser, 7mm-08, or 7x64 Brenneke, or 7mm mag at 50 yards further away.  The need for the new cases are reduced pressures and thus the strain on weapons and more efficient powder burn.  Increasing the base diameter of the case accomplishes this without a loss in velocity.  I think that a case design like the .375 Ruger is just the beginning for a whole line up of new wildcats.  Not that we need them, but the reloader like it for easy changes and campfire talk of having something unique.  It would be a good case in .338, wouldn't it?
Greg
Greg lost his battle with cancer last week on April 2nd 2009. RIP Greg. We miss you.

Greg
deltecs
Detente: An armed citizenry versus a liberal society
Opinion(s) are expressly mine alone and do not necessarily agree with those of GB or GBO mgmt.

Offline Coyote Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2534
Re: .375 Ruger
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2007, 03:24:06 AM »
... It would be a good case in .338, wouldn't it?
Greg

Excuse me while I wipe the drool off my face...
Coyote Hunter
NRA, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!

Offline k3yston3

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Re: .375 Ruger
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2007, 03:29:30 AM »
I bet Remington puts it in their Zastava rather than the 700 though.


You say that like its a bad thing.... I'd rather have the 798 if I was forced to choose between it an the 700.   ;D


I think that .375H&H performance in a standard length mauser action would be quite a nice combo, better even still if Rem follows through and produces the SS 798s as advertised.  I would have rather paid Charles Daly's price though!

Offline Ratltrap

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 137
Re: .375 Ruger
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2007, 02:40:56 PM »
I bet Remington puts it in their Zastava rather than the 700 though.


You say that like its a bad thing.... I'd rather have the 798 if I was forced to choose between it an the 700.   ;D


I think that .375H&H performance in a standard length mauser action would be quite a nice combo, better even still if Rem follows through and produces the SS 798s as advertised.  I would have rather paid Charles Daly's price though!

Since I already have a real nice Mark X version of the Zastava in 375 H&H it will be hard to justify 375 Ruger in any action, but I'd agree that the 375 Ruger on a Mauser action is a natural. My Mark X took some work to get to where I can say it's a real nice rifle but the 798 I saw was a long way from even being as nice as my Mark X started out. I'm sure that 798 could be made into a nice rifle, but I probably wouldn't spend money on one. I also like the 700 action - but again I probably wouldn't buy a 700 in 375 Ruger. If pressed, I'd have to take either a CZ or a Ruger over either Rem. offering for cartridges that are going to push back - that is unless I'm going to have to pack it uphill all day. Weight is why I no longer have a 7x57 CZ.

Offline k3yston3

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Re: .375 Ruger
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2007, 02:45:02 AM »
Ratltrap,
You are right about the 798s being rough, the two that I have had in my hands have been incredibly rough.  I too own a Mark X, but mine is a whitworth and was baby's butt smooth when I got it.  Personally I do think that remington wouldn't want to chamber it in the 700 either as it might cut in to 375 ultra sales...

Offline RaySendero

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
  • Gender: Male
Re: .375 Ruger
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2007, 02:57:08 PM »
Does anyone know what the cartridge overall length and case head diameter are???
    Ray

Offline Coyote Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2534
Re: .375 Ruger
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2007, 02:28:51 AM »
Ray -

It fits a .30-06 action and the diameter is the same as the belt on a belted mag.
Coyote Hunter
NRA, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!