Tucker, Kent interview

[DDZ]

Wonder what the FBI, and DOJ want to keep buried?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L4zjjT6FQQ

[DDZ]

Kent talking about Iran.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOuJzvsMeGQ

[DDZ]

Here is another video on the subject of Joe Kent by Tucker.  Those that tell the truth are labeled, and attacked. As in Kents case. He's a leaker, a tool of Hizballah, Israel hater etc..

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OexyA0BPois

[geosmin]

Carlson bases his following premises on a false narrative and conclusion concerning General Westmoreland and Walter Cronkite.

Carlson leads with that because he needs his listeners to believe that first, before he moves into telling his lies, which he claims as truth.

[gypsyman]

 With Kents history, he's put it on the line, not just talk. He's put this country first, I'll believe him before some politicians that are sidewalk commando's!

[ironglowz]

With Kents history, he's put it on the line, not just talk. He's put this country first, I'll believe him before some politicians that are sidewalk commando's!

  Kent does deserve credit for serving honorably.  ...But his "well done" tributes do not speak for the entire congress of course.  He is not alone in the Republican congress as one who served in a Spec Ops unit.

  Representing Navy Seals alone, are..Eli Crane, Morgan Luttrell, Dan Crenshaw, Derrick, Derrick Van Orden, John McGuire and Tim Sheehy.. Not to mention other Spec Ops vets..
   
  https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/03/10/navy-seals-congress-trump-00212473

   None of them seem to have a problem with Pres Trump's position vis-a-vis Iran !

     Curiously, Joe Kent was once in favor of striking Iranian regime.
     https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2026/03/17/joe-kent-previously-argued-iran-was-threat-to-the-usa-pushed-for-wiping-out-nuclear-missile-capabilities/

  So he cozies up to Tucker Carlson. There seems to be a single over-arching condemnation held by Tucker, and it appears to be the same view held by Candace Owens and Megyn Kelley... They seem to be against Jews and Israel..

     Such a conspiracy theory is of course nothing new or original.  It is as old as recorded history, and seems to share symptoms with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

  Could this be the root of the disagreement?

[ironglowz]

  Then too, how often have we seen ourselves, that when a fellow is about to be fired, jhe beats the boss to it by quitting ?
https://nypost.com/2026/03/17/us-news/ex-white-house-official-suggests-joe-kent-was-about-to-get-fired-before-his-dramatic-resignation/
   

[gypsyman]

With Kents history, he's put it on the line, not just talk. He's put this country first, I'll believe him before some politicians that are sidewalk commando's!

  Kent does deserve credit for serving honorably.  ...But his "well done" tributes do not speak for the entire congress of course.  He is not alone in the Republican congress as one who served in a Spec Ops unit.

  Representing Navy Seals alone, are..Eli Crane, Morgan Luttrell, Dan Crenshaw, Derrick, Derrick Van Orden, John McGuire and Tim Sheehy.. Not to mention other Spec Ops vets..
   
  https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/03/10/navy-seals-congress-trump-00212473

   None of them seem to have a problem with Pres Trump's position vis-a-vis Iran !

     Curiously, Joe Kent was once in favor of striking Iranian regime.
     https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2026/03/17/joe-kent-previously-argued-iran-was-threat-to-the-usa-pushed-for-wiping-out-nuclear-missile-capabilities/

  So he cozies up to Tucker Carlson. There seems to be a single over-arching condemnation held by Tucker, and it appears to be the same view held by Candace Owens and Megyn Kelley... They seem to be against Jews and Israel..

     Such a conspiracy theory is of course nothing new or original.  It is as old as recorded history, and seems to share symptoms with Trump Derangement Syndrome.

  Could this be the root of the disagreement?

I'd give Trump a lot more credit if it didn't look like every time somebody from Israel says jump, he says how high? Miriam Adelson, Lutnick, majority of our congressmen getting millions from AIPAC. Kent, Carjson and a couple others are just wondering, with this country now over 39 trillion in debt just a couple days ago, maybe this government better start taking care of the best Ally it's got, U.S. citizens and taxpayers here.

[ironglowz]

Kent talking about Iran.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOuJzvsMeGQ

  Of course, US intelligence agencies and others claim Iran was just weeks from having a nuclear weapon(s).  Mossad, one of the top intelligence services world wide, agrees !
      https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/iran-nuclear-weapons-iran-could-build-a-nuclear-bomb-in-15-days-claims-israeli-intelligence-agency-mossad-in-report-details-here/ar-AA1Ha1xG

   The CIA employs about 21,575  people, one guy quits for some reason, and starts turning against his employer, amidst some saying he was about to be fired..

   So, should we believe him implicitly...or the other 21,574 employees? 

   Glen Beck offers new information he he has collected;     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4nSQ_aRPmk

   Keep in mind, Joe's first wife Shannon, was killed by just such terrorists in January 2019.. ()

  His second wife Heather also a veteran, has a podcast called "The Gray Zone", which many view as a conspiracy theory haven.

  Try roaming in The Gray Zone for a bit !          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tFQ6sfStPM 

[gypsyman]

 Doubt seriously Iran was even close to having a nuke. Go back to 1992 and you can see news clips of Netanyaho claiming Iran was just months to maybe a year away from a nuke. I honestly believe, if they had actually had built one, they'd have used it by now. With this Iran war going on, notice that the vast majority of their missile's are Chinese or Russian? Got them in trade for mostly oil over the last 10-15 years. Or bought with the billions of dollars Obama gave them. I'm more afraid that one of those cluster bombs there firing at Israel will hit a nuke site there and set one of their nukes off. That will change game plans.

[DDZ]

Doubt seriously Iran was even close to having a nuke. Go back to 1992 and you can see news clips of Netanyaho claiming Iran was just months to maybe a year away from a nuke. I honestly believe, if they had actually had built one, they'd have used it by now. With this Iran war going on, notice that the vast majority of their missile's are Chinese or Russian? Got them in trade for mostly oil over the last 10-15 years. Or bought with the billions of dollars Obama gave them. I'm more afraid that one of those cluster bombs there firing at Israel will hit a nuke site there and set one of their nukes off. That will change game plans.

Yeah Netanyaho has been saying it for over 30 years, and politicians here have been claiming the same for as long.  Would have thought they would have quit saying it especially after them claiming Irans nuclear capability was completely obliterated with bunker buster bombs. Guess the military industrial complex still needed an excuse to drop bombs, and launch missiles on Iran.   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mzmtdwsef8s

[ironglowz]

Doubt seriously Iran was even close to having a nuke. Go back to 1992 and you can see news clips of Netanyaho claiming Iran was just months to maybe a year away from a nuke.  With this Iran war going on, notice that the vast majority of their missile's are Chinese or Russian? Got them in trade for mostly oil over the last 10-15 years. Or bought with the billions of dollars Obama gave them. I'm more afraid that one of those cluster bombs there firing at Israel will hit a nuke site there and set one of their nukes off. That will change game plans.

  The atomic energy commission and Iranian officials themselves, claim they have 440 KG of enriched uranium on hand.  The bomb that took out Hiroshima used 61 KG
    of enriched uranium.

    "I honestly believe, if they had actually had built one, they'd have used it by now."

   So now they have reached enough a stockpile for a couple bombs, should we just "wait and see' when they will use it ?  Since we are the "Big Satan", we are #1
  listed for destruction, and they have enough to hit us and Israel, which is #2 ?   

  Keeping in  mind those crazy Mullahs know they can't beat us, but that is not their aim.  Their aim is toi justv throw the entire world into their version of an apocalypse,
  allowing for the introduction of their "twelfth Imam"..

   Yes, I guess we could just "wait and see', but is that the more prudent action (or inaction)?